Three Roads To Quantum Gravity
Three Roads To Quantum Gravity
Three Roads To Quantum Gravity
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
180 THREE ROADS TO QUANTUM GRAVITY<br />
to change the rules, not once but over and over again. There<br />
are not particles, there are strings. There are not three<br />
dimensions of space but nine. There are extra symmetries.<br />
String theory is unique. Actually, it is not quite unique ± it<br />
comes in an enormous number of versions. And in fact there<br />
are not just strings, but membranes of many different<br />
dimensions. And there are not nine dimensions, but ten.<br />
And so on. String theory has been nothing but a series of<br />
surprises, one after the other. We put in no principles ± all we<br />
put in is the desire for a theory of gravitons that makes sense.<br />
And we get out a long list of unexpected facts, a whole new<br />
world to be explored.<br />
For more than ten years, from about 1984 to 1996, these two<br />
theories of quantum gravity were developed by two different<br />
groups of people completely independently. Each group was<br />
successful in solving the problems it set for itself. Although<br />
we listened to each other's talks, and maintained friendships<br />
formed before the split, it must be said that almost everyone<br />
thought that their group was on the right path and the others<br />
were misguided. <strong>To</strong> each group it was obvious why the other<br />
could not succeed. The loop guys (and gals) said to the string<br />
guys, `Your theory is not background independent, it cannot<br />
be a real quantum theory of space and time. Only we know<br />
how to make a successful background independent theory.'<br />
The string guys said to the loop guys, `Your theory does not<br />
give a consistent description of the interactions between<br />
gravitons and other particles. Only our theory describes a<br />
consistent uni®cation of gravity with the other interactions.' I<br />
am ashamed to admit that few in either community rose to the<br />
challenge. During this whole period, for example, there was<br />
not a single person who worked on both theories. Many<br />
seemed to make the understandable mistake of confusing the<br />
solution of part of the problem of quantum gravity with the<br />
solution of the whole problem.<br />
Many misunderstandings have resulted. I have had the<br />
experience more than once of sitting next to someone from<br />
one camp listening to a talk by someone from the other. The<br />
person next to me would get very agitated: "That young<br />
person is so arrogant, they claim they have solved every-