13.06.2015 Views

Three Roads To Quantum Gravity

Three Roads To Quantum Gravity

Three Roads To Quantum Gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

WHAT CHOOSES THE LAWS OF NATURE?<br />

199<br />

have different sets of elementary particles which interact<br />

according to different sets of laws. If there are adjustable<br />

parameters, it is possible that they are set at random each time<br />

a new universe is created.<br />

So there is a simple answer to the anthropic question.<br />

Among all the possible universes, a minority will have the<br />

property that their laws are hospitable to life. Since we are<br />

alive, we naturally ®nd ourselves in one of them. And since<br />

there are a great many universes, we need not worry that the<br />

chance of any one of them being hospitable to life is small,<br />

because the chance of at least one of them being hospitable to<br />

life may not be small. There will then be nothing to explain.<br />

Martin Rees likes to put this in the following way: if one ®nds<br />

a bag by the side of the road containing a suit that ®ts one<br />

perfectly, that is something to wonder about. But if one goes<br />

into a clothing store and is able to ®nd a suit that ®ts, there is<br />

no mystery because the store carries lots of suits in many<br />

different sizes. We may call this the God of The Gap. It is also<br />

sometimes called the weak anthropic principle.<br />

The only problem with this kind of explanation is that it is<br />

dif®cult to see how it could be refuted. As long as your theory<br />

yields a very large number of universes, you only need there<br />

to be at least one like ours. The theory makes no other<br />

predictions apart from the existence of at least one universe<br />

like ours. But we already know that, so there is no way to<br />

refute this theory. This might seem good, but actually it is not<br />

because a theory that cannot be refuted cannot really be part<br />

of science. It can't carry very much explanatory weight,<br />

because whatever features our universe has, as long as it can<br />

be described by one of the large number of string theories, our<br />

theory will not be refuted. Therefore it can make no new<br />

predictions about our universe.<br />

Is it possible to have a theory which gives a scienti®c<br />

answer to the anthropic question? Such a theory may be<br />

framed around the possibility that the universe can make a<br />

physical transition from one phase to another. If we could<br />

look back into the history of the universe to before the big<br />

bang, it may be that we would see one or a whole succession<br />

of different phases in which the universe had different

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!