09.07.2015 Views

Subjectivism and Economic Analysis: Essays in memory of Ludwig ...

Subjectivism and Economic Analysis: Essays in memory of Ludwig ...

Subjectivism and Economic Analysis: Essays in memory of Ludwig ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

10EXPECTATIONS ANDSTOCK MARKET PRICESJochen Runde <strong>and</strong> jörg BibowA familiar theme <strong>in</strong> <strong>Ludwig</strong> Lachmann’s writ<strong>in</strong>gs is the notion <strong>of</strong>‘divergent’ expectations <strong>in</strong> stock markets. The follow<strong>in</strong>g passage isfairly typical:The Stock Exchange consists <strong>of</strong> a series <strong>of</strong> markets for assets,i.e., future yield streams. In each market supply <strong>and</strong> dem<strong>and</strong>are brought <strong>in</strong>to equality every day. Dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> supplyreflect the divergent expectations <strong>of</strong> buyers <strong>and</strong> sellersconcern<strong>in</strong>g future yields. Transactions take place betweenthose whose expectations diverge from the current marketprice. S<strong>in</strong>ce as much must be bought as is sold, we may saythat the equilibrium price <strong>in</strong> an asset market reflects the‘balance <strong>of</strong> expectations’. As without divergence <strong>of</strong>expectations there can be no market at all, we can say thatthis divergence provides the substrate upon which the marketprice rests.(Lachmann 1977:161)The many similar passages on the nature <strong>and</strong> role <strong>of</strong> expectations <strong>in</strong>stock markets that appear <strong>in</strong> Lachmann’s writ<strong>in</strong>gs are <strong>in</strong>variably<strong>in</strong>sightful <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>structive. His commitment to subjectivism, toanalys<strong>in</strong>g economic phenomena from the viewpo<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> the<strong>in</strong>terpret<strong>in</strong>g economic actor, moreover, provides an importantperspective that is denied on more conventional assumptions aboutexpectations. Yet it seems to us that Lachmann is seldomparticularly explicit about what he takes the term ‘expectation’ torefer to or express <strong>and</strong>, accord<strong>in</strong>gly, that his dist<strong>in</strong>ctive <strong>and</strong> highlysuggestive writ<strong>in</strong>gs on expectations <strong>in</strong> stock markets <strong>in</strong>vite both183

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!