09.07.2015 Views

Subjectivism and Economic Analysis: Essays in memory of Ludwig ...

Subjectivism and Economic Analysis: Essays in memory of Ludwig ...

Subjectivism and Economic Analysis: Essays in memory of Ludwig ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

JOCHEN RUNDE AND JÖRG BIBOWthe bank<strong>in</strong>g system s balance sheet. (In the General Theory, <strong>in</strong>contrast, all <strong>in</strong>stitutional detail is suppressed <strong>and</strong> the whole effect <strong>of</strong>changes <strong>in</strong> beliefs is necessarily on security prices, given that thestock <strong>of</strong> money, that is the size <strong>of</strong> the bank<strong>in</strong>g system s balancesheet, is constant by assumption.)To beg<strong>in</strong> with, <strong>in</strong> the Treatise on Money bearish views on the part<strong>of</strong> the public may have no effect on securities prices where theseviews are compensated by the bank<strong>in</strong>g system tak<strong>in</strong>g the oppositeview <strong>and</strong> buy<strong>in</strong>g the securities. An alternative possible case <strong>of</strong>divergent beliefs mentioned by Keynes occurs when ‘two views’develop with<strong>in</strong> the public. Whilst <strong>in</strong> the former case the bank<strong>in</strong>gsystem <strong>and</strong> the public hold oppos<strong>in</strong>g views, <strong>and</strong> the effect <strong>of</strong> a change<strong>in</strong> beliefs about future prices may be reflected partly <strong>in</strong> security prices<strong>and</strong> partly <strong>in</strong> changes <strong>in</strong> the size <strong>of</strong> the bank<strong>in</strong>g system’s balancesheet, <strong>in</strong> the latter case changes <strong>in</strong> the size <strong>of</strong> the bank<strong>in</strong>g system’sbalance sheet do not necessarily require the bank<strong>in</strong>g system to take aparticular view. Rather it may simply provide additional short-termadvances to the ‘bulls’ who buy securities from the ‘bears’ who endup hold<strong>in</strong>g more ‘sav<strong>in</strong>gs deposits B’. Keynes f<strong>in</strong>ds that both ‘bull’<strong>and</strong> ‘bear’ markets may occur with either convergent or divergentexpectations about future prices. For <strong>in</strong>stance, <strong>in</strong> the case <strong>of</strong> a bullmarket with convergent expectations, bears are clos<strong>in</strong>g their positionson a ris<strong>in</strong>g market <strong>and</strong> the volume <strong>of</strong> sav<strong>in</strong>gs deposits B falls. In abull market with divergent expectations, <strong>in</strong> contrast, bears may be<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g their positions on a ris<strong>in</strong>g market. To repeat, the size <strong>of</strong>the bank<strong>in</strong>g system’s balance sheet (<strong>and</strong> the amount <strong>of</strong> sav<strong>in</strong>gsdeposits B provided) may change either because the bank<strong>in</strong>g systemitself is tak<strong>in</strong>g a view on securities prices or because it decides t<strong>of</strong>acilitate the chang<strong>in</strong>g degree <strong>of</strong> divergence <strong>of</strong> beliefs with<strong>in</strong> the public,where the public may also take recourse to channels outside thebank<strong>in</strong>g system.Keynes (1971:225) ventures that both the volume <strong>of</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancialtransactions <strong>and</strong> the size <strong>of</strong> bear positions are ‘likely to bephenomena <strong>of</strong> rapidly chang<strong>in</strong>g prices rather than <strong>of</strong> an absolutelyhigh or low level’. The volatility <strong>of</strong> prices, for <strong>in</strong>stance, may reflectcontradictory <strong>in</strong>formation that becomes available <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>creases thediversity <strong>of</strong> beliefs about future prices. In addition, Keynes mentionsthe possibility <strong>of</strong> speculative excesses lead<strong>in</strong>g to what we would nowcall ‘bubbles’. He f<strong>in</strong>ds that such a development may be related <strong>in</strong> itsf<strong>in</strong>al stage to beliefs about future prices that have diverged widely,with abrupt falls <strong>in</strong> security prices resolv<strong>in</strong>g the tension betweenoppos<strong>in</strong>g views.194

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!