18.11.2012 Views

Chapter 3 Decision Support Model (IUWS-DSM) - Tubdok

Chapter 3 Decision Support Model (IUWS-DSM) - Tubdok

Chapter 3 Decision Support Model (IUWS-DSM) - Tubdok

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.4 System evaluation<br />

<strong>Chapter</strong> 3 · <strong>Decision</strong> <strong>Support</strong> <strong>Model</strong> (<strong>IUWS</strong>-<strong>DSM</strong>) 71<br />

The cost and energy consumption are chosen as the criteria to evaluate system options,<br />

where the cost estimation is the essential criterion. The general methods to determine them<br />

are proposed. The model users choose the suitable criteria and methods according to their<br />

actual situation.<br />

3.4.1 System sizes<br />

As introduced in 2.1.2, the water infrastructure consists of intake and treatment facilities,<br />

and conveying system. Their sizes need be determined in the first.<br />

The sizes of intake and treatment facilities are directly corresponding to the water<br />

demand. The common metrical units are water volume (e.g. China, Australia) and capita<br />

equivalent (e.g. Germany). Usually the large treatment plants are on-site constructed, whose<br />

structures and facilities are concentrated. The package plants have even simpler situation as<br />

they are manufactured and generally have small sizes.<br />

Unlike intake and treatment facilities, the conveying system is spread over the whole<br />

service area. Hence, the determination of its scales is complex. In classical methods, it is<br />

calculated case by case based on the real data. In the early project phase, besides the<br />

difficulty of gathering the adequate actual data, the requirement of calculation accuracy is<br />

also relative low. Hence, the scales of conveying system, especially water networks and<br />

sewerage system, can be estimated based on statistical data, whereby certain relations<br />

between population and pipe system scales are established. One typical pattern is<br />

demonstrated in Table 30.<br />

Such statistical information in some nations is available, which can be used directly or as<br />

references. As the examples, in USA this information of water networks and sewer system<br />

can be obtained from USEPA (2002) and Dames and Moore (1978), respectively. Burnside<br />

(2005) provides the statistical information of both water mains and sewer for Canada.<br />

Table 30: Evaluation of pipe assets based on statistical data (as pattern)<br />

no.<br />

[1] population<br />

range<br />

1 3.000 – 10.000<br />

2 10.000 – 50.000<br />

3 50.000 – 100.000<br />

4 100.000 – 500.000<br />

5 > 500.000<br />

6 average<br />

< 150 [2]<br />

average length based on pipe diameters<br />

[km]<br />

150 –<br />

250<br />

250 –<br />

600<br />

> 600 [3] total<br />

[1] the planners should define the population ranges based on their own situation.<br />

[2] the clusters of pipes should be categorised based on the statistical data and local conditions.<br />

[3] the unit of pipe diameter is mm.<br />

average<br />

length<br />

[m/capita]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!