Tuition, <strong>Financial</strong> Aid & Endowmentreduced <strong>Cornell</strong>’s funding. This methodology also providedno inflation for <strong>Cornell</strong>’s land-grant mission andits provision <strong>of</strong> instruction for contract college studentsin endowed Ithaca colleges (so-called “accessoryinstruction”). Beginning in 2006-07, <strong>Cornell</strong>’s overallstate operating support—while still flowing throughSUNY—has been largely separated from SUNY’s regularcampus resource allocation process. Within that total,the portion <strong>of</strong> state operating support attributableto land-grant activities is provided through discrete,line-item funding in the governor’s executive budget.This partition appropriately recognizes that <strong>Cornell</strong>’sland-grant responsibilities as well as the organizationaland financial structures associated with instructionalactivities are unique and should not be commingledwith other SUNY campus resource allocations.Since 1970-71, there has been nominal growth ingovernment appropriations for the contract colleges,as federal and state funding has expanded at an averageannual rate <strong>of</strong> 4.1 percent. Unfortunately, thisgrowth has not maintained its purchasing power, andgovernment appropriations have declined from $206Inflation-Adjusted Dollars in MillionsFederally Sponsored ResearchExpenditures – <strong>Cornell</strong> <strong>University</strong>(in inflation-adjusted, 2006-07 dollars)$300$250$200$150$100$50Ithaca CampusMedical College$041 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 81 86 91 96 01 06Fiscal Yearmillion to $171 million, in inflation-adjusted terms,over the same period. Appropriations that funded 67percent <strong>of</strong> the contract colleges’ operating budget in1970-71 now support 30 percent <strong>of</strong> that total. Otherrevenues—tuition and fees, grants and contracts, gifts,investment income, and sales and services <strong>of</strong> academicdepartments—have together supplanted governmentappropriations as the major sources <strong>of</strong> operatingsupport. The gradual decline in state funding for thecontract colleges—transforming them from state-supportedto state-assisted—has been an important factorin the <strong>of</strong>fsetting increase in contract college tuitiondiscussed and illustrated on page 15.Grants and ContractsWhile <strong>Cornell</strong>’s faculty have engaged in scholarshipand have carried out investigatory projects fromthe university’s founding, the concept <strong>of</strong> externallyfunded research did not develop until the first part <strong>of</strong>the twentieth century, when commercial firms beganto underwrite graduate study by providing “industrialfellowships.” 17 It was not until World War II, however,that substantial external funding was provided to<strong>Cornell</strong> and other universities in the form <strong>of</strong> researchgrants and contracts. As the graph at left shows, thevolume <strong>of</strong> this support expanded rapidly at <strong>Cornell</strong>,and the university’s federal funding for research totaled$382.9 million in 2006-07, while overall researchexpenditures—federal, state, and local government;corporate; foundation; private donor; and institutionalfunding—reached $659.4 million in the same fiscalyear. Inflation-adjusted expenditures <strong>of</strong> federally sponsoredresearch on the Ithaca campus expanded rapidlyfrom the early 1960’s through the mid-1980’s, thenstalled for over a decade before increasing again inthe twenty-first century. Federally sponsored researchexpenditures at the Joan and Sanford I. Weill Medical17 “Thanks to [Herbert H.] Whetzel’s initiative, industrialfellowships were established at <strong>Cornell</strong>, among the first inAmerica. He proposed to the Niagara Sprayer Company<strong>of</strong> Middleport, New York, that it support investigations inthe value <strong>of</strong> lime-sulfur solution as a spray for apple scab.The company responded in 1909 and apparently made itsfortune from the results. Thus the system began by which amanufacturer pays for a graduate student to study a problemwhich may result in pr<strong>of</strong>it for the manufacturer and a doctoratefor the student.” Bishop, Morris, A History <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cornell</strong>.Ithaca: <strong>Cornell</strong> <strong>University</strong> Press, 1962.20
Tuition, <strong>Financial</strong> Aid & EndowmentCollege and Graduate School <strong>of</strong> Medical Sciences havealso increased substantially, though at a steadier pace.Ithaca campus research growth has been driven primarilyby the expansion <strong>of</strong> federal support for basicscience and engineering studies that has been funneledthrough the National Science Foundation (NSF)and the Department <strong>of</strong> Defense. The lack <strong>of</strong> inflationadjustedgrowth in federal and New York State appropriations(a portion <strong>of</strong> which fund basic and appliedresearch) has <strong>of</strong>fset some <strong>of</strong> this growth. Almost allgrant and contract support for the Medical Collegecomes from the National Institutes <strong>of</strong> Health (NIH).While <strong>Cornell</strong>’s faculty are very effective in garneringa substantial share <strong>of</strong> federal research support, theuniversity’s market share <strong>of</strong> overall federal researchand development funding for science and engineeringhas changed over time. (See graph below.) A factor affecting<strong>Cornell</strong>’s success in obtaining federal researchfunding is the U.S. Congress’s growing practice <strong>of</strong> earmarkingacademic research funding. As reported in theChronicle <strong>of</strong> Higher Education recently, $1.6 billion “…was directed to scientific research at almost 500 institutions…[representing] about 5 percent <strong>of</strong> all federal<strong>Cornell</strong> <strong>University</strong>’s Market Share <strong>of</strong>Overall Federal Research and DevelopmentExpenditures in Science and Engineering3.0%Sources <strong>of</strong> Support for <strong>Cornell</strong> <strong>University</strong>Research Expenditures – 2006-07State & Local11%Commercial4%Foundation/Nonpr<strong>of</strong>it/Other9%Federal58%<strong>Cornell</strong>Resources *18%* As per NSF reporting guidelines, <strong>Cornell</strong> resourcesinclude: institutional cost sharing, graduate assistantshiptuition fellowships, university seed researchgrants, unrecovered facilities and administrativecosts, and the organized research portion <strong>of</strong> NewYork State-funded employee benefits.money for academic research” in 2007-08. 18 As <strong>Cornell</strong>generally eschews federal earmarks, the universitydoes not effectively compete for this funding source. 19Percent Market Share2.5%2.0%1.5%1.0%0.5%Construction <strong>of</strong>the AreciboFacility0.0%53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93 97 01 05Fiscal Year21Increasingly, <strong>Cornell</strong> must utilize its own resources tohelp fund the overall research enterprise. In 2006-07,$118 million (18 percent <strong>of</strong> overall research expenditures)was so dedicated. (See graph above.) These expendituresinclude cost sharing, a portion <strong>of</strong> the cost<strong>of</strong> tuition for graduate assistantship holders, facilitiesand administrative costs attributable to research thatcannot be recovered from the sponsors <strong>of</strong> that activity,institutional funding to encourage new research en-18 Brainard, Jeffrey and J.J. Hermes, “Colleges’ EarmarksGrow, Amid Criticism.” The Chronicle <strong>of</strong> Higher Education(Mar. 28, 2008). http://chronicle.com/weekly/v54/i29/29a00101.htm19 While The Chronicle <strong>of</strong> Higher Education reported that<strong>Cornell</strong> benefited from $5.1 million in non-shared earmarksin 2007-08, the total was closer to $4.1 million, according toan analysis conducted by <strong>Cornell</strong>’s <strong>Division</strong> <strong>of</strong> Governmentand Community Relations.
- Page 5 and 6: Operating plan - highlightsIntroduc
- Page 8: Operating plan - highlightsComposit
- Page 11 and 12: Tuition, Financial Aid & Endowmentm
- Page 13 and 14: Tuition, Financial Aid & Endowmentu
- Page 15 and 16: Tuition, Financial Aid & EndowmentC
- Page 17 and 18: Tuition, Financial Aid & Endowmentf
- Page 19: Tuition, Financial Aid & EndowmentD
- Page 23 and 24: Tuition, Financial Aid & EndowmentS
- Page 25 and 26: Tuition, Financial Aid & Endowmentw
- Page 27: Tuition, Financial Aid & Endowmentt
- Page 31 and 32: Tuition, Financial Aid & Endowmentp
- Page 33 and 34: Operating plan - DetailsIthaca Camp
- Page 35 and 36: Operating plan - DetailsSignificant
- Page 37 and 38: Operating plan - Detailstive staff
- Page 39 and 40: Operating plan - Detailsand develop
- Page 41 and 42: Operating plan - DetailsCentrallyOt
- Page 43 and 44: Operating plan - DetailsMedical Col
- Page 45 and 46: Capital PlanDistribution of Space -
- Page 47 and 48: Capital Plan• New York State supp
- Page 49 and 50: Capital PlanFUNDING SOURCESFINANCIN
- Page 51 and 52: Capital PlanEXPENDITURE PATTERNEsti
- Page 53 and 54: Capital PlanFUNDING SOURCESFINANCIN
- Page 55 and 56: Capital PlanEXPENDITURE PATTERNEsti
- Page 57 and 58: Capital PlanEXPENDITURE PATTERNEsti
- Page 59 and 60: Capital PlanDebt Service by Operati
- Page 61 and 62: BStudent Fees and Other Tuition Rat
- Page 63 and 64: DUndergraduate Tuition, Fees, Room,
- Page 65 and 66: FAverage Nine-Month Faculty Salarie
- Page 67 and 68: HNew York State AppropriationsSourc
- Page 69 and 70: JInvestment Assets, Returns, and Pa
- Page 71 and 72:
LGifts/Contributions - Through Marc
- Page 73 and 74:
NWorkforce - Ithaca Campus2007-08 I
- Page 75 and 76:
PU.S. Senate ResponseThe Senate Com
- Page 77 and 78:
U.S. Senate Response (continued)of
- Page 79 and 80:
U.S. Senate Response (continued)inc
- Page 81 and 82:
U.S. Senate Response (continued)fro
- Page 83 and 84:
U.S. Senate Response (continued)Tab
- Page 85 and 86:
U.S. Senate Response (continued)Tab
- Page 87 and 88:
U.S. Senate Response (continued)Tab