Globalization and <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Development</strong>Box (1.1)Globalization and Cultural Encounter in EgyptThe positive impacts of globalization in Egypt may beexpected to generate a big rise in life expectancy, asignificant increase in the literacy rate, and the sustainablegrowth of per capita income. Nonetheless, perhaps theworst long-term effect of globalization on Egyptian societyhas been the growth of social and cultural dualism. Thishas been the result of the availability of a much greatervariety of foreign goods, and of the exposure of a muchhigher proportion of the population to these goods and to apowerful mass media greatly influenced by foreign tastes.It is difficult to think of a period in Egypt’s modern historyduring which local culture has been subjected to greaterexternal influences than it has been during the last two orthree decades.One important example of the impact of globalization onEgyptian culture is its influence on the national language.The Arabic language is being progressively mixed withEuropean languages in aspects of every-day life.Multinational firms, for example, require foreignlanguage-speakers, and are attractive employers. The highvalue placed on the "foreign" impacts on the nationallanguage, which gradually becomes subsidiary to thelanguage of business, and by association, impacts onaspects of culture such as indigenous music, national dress,national styles in architecture, food preferences, choice ofrecreation, and even on choice of consumer product. Andas in other countries, it is the younger generations who aredisproportionately influenced by western culture. Theimpact should not be underestimated. One could claim thatdamage to local cultures is of a similar nature to damage tothe physical environment, and could be considered a formof ‘unsustainable’ development.While virtually all of society may be exposed to theinfluence of alien cultures and patterns of consumption, notall sections of the population succumb. Those withinsufficient purchasing power, or who are more deeplyimmersed in local traditions, or both, often feel a sense ofbetrayal by those who are more westernized, given theirgreater income or their longer exposure to western culturalinfluences. In turn, this contributes towards an increasingsocial gap, creates income and cultural enclaves, andweakens national cohesion, adding to the possibility ofsocial and political turmoil. This aspect of globalizationcould by itself go a long way towards explaining thegrowth of the phenomenon commonly known as ‘religiousfanaticism’.Coping with the ChallengesBecome exposed to new and often severe forms ofcompetition from which one had hitherto been protected, isa basic outcome of globalization. The weaker party -whether in trade, industry, or otherwise, must learn to copeif it is to survive. Communities of all types, whether basedon race, belief systems or national loyalties, which haveattempted to isolate themselves from the process ofglobalization have, sooner or later, been constrained toopen up to the world, if not through choice then throughcircumstance. Although many nations have passed throughsome period of relative and beneficial isolation,contemporary history demonstrates that the advance ofglobalization is hard, if not impossible to check. A countrylike Egypt cannot hope to stem the tide, but there are waysto ensure that the impact of globalization will be lessdamaging to social relations and cultural identity.The main issue is how to pursue the process of culturalinteraction with the outside world at our own appropriatepace. In the sphere of culture, it is not a question of how toincrease ‘efficiency’ and enhance ‘competitiveness’. In theprocess of raising economic efficiency and enhancingcompetitiveness, it is clear that the old ways of life and thetraditional system of values will need to be reappraised.The greatest challenge to national culture comes from thecommunications revolution, associated with recentdevelopments in the mass media. In this respect, just as ineconomics, a developing country such as Egypt may feelthe need to provide some kind of ‘protection’. Butprotection may prove difficult or futile, since ideas, lifestyles and belief systems are no less seductive than goodsand services, especially when supported by a powerfulmass media. As the power of the state diminishes in anincreasingly market-oriented society, and with theincreasing influence of multinational corporations andinternational institutions, civil society must developsufficiently to fill the gap. Greater internationalcooperation, whether among states or among civil societyassociations, may help identify and provide for the servicesthat the state is no longer able to deliver on its own. InEgypt, there has been a rapid growth in the activity andinfluence of civil society, and a greater participation inregional and international action to face problems createdor aggravated by globalization.Egypt <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Development</strong> Report 2000/2001 - 13
Globalization and <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Development</strong>The question for acountry like Egypt iswhat the net effect ofglobalization is likelyto be.Countries mustfollow a strategy thatwould maximizebenefits fromglobalizationopportunities andminimize thenegative threats ofglobalization.● Maintaining National Security:Globalization is meant to reduce theprobabilities of warfare and enhance theopportunities for peace. The confidentialityrequired for national security purposes islikely to dwindle, and this process will befurther affected by advanced technology,sophisticated communication devices andthe Internet.. This could createvulnerabilities in the case of conflict;particularly since confrontation andconflict appear to be permanentcharacteristics of our world. For Egyptand the Arab region, as long as no justand permanent peace settlement withIsrael has been reached, conflict willremain a reality, and will require preventativemeasures for national security.The Net OutcomeGiven the opportunities and threats to whichcountries are exposed under globalization,the question arises as to whether countriesshould choose to become isolated fromglobal trends and close their doors in orderto preserve their interests.Given that there is neither a free ride nor afree lunch, the question for a country likeEgypt is what the net effect of globalizationis likely to be. The answer depends on boththe actions of the country in question andthe international community. Countriesmust follow a strategy that would maximizebenefits from globalization opportunitiesand minimize the negative threats ofglobalization. This would require policiescapable of redressing distortions in thenational economy, raising productionefficiency and deepening specialization inthe fields where each country enjoyscomparative and competitive advantages.Improved education, higher productivity,efficient administration and goodgovernance are the main guarantees for anet positive effect from globalization.The influence of globalization depends alsoon the actions of the internationalcommunity, with its various actors: thesuperpowers, international organizations,and the arrangements and agreementsbetween various states, as well as their realcommitment to development goals. Theworld system is not likely to create in thenear future an international body able toredress inequitable income distributionworldwide resulting from globalization, aswould be the case within a nationaleconomy. Further, no state is ready torelinquish part of its sovereignty to such aninternational authority. Given theserealities, can the international communitymake arrangements to coordinate internationaland national interest within the frameworkof a global society? This remains to be seen.Finally, insulation from the world marketdeprives countries of much needed capital,technology, low cost and better qualitygoods and services, as well as theopportunity to create jobs in the exportsectors. However, the unqualifiedintegration of developing countries intoworld markets can be equally costly, as therecent crises in East Asia, Russia and Brazildemonstrate. Capital can fly suddenly,leading to the collapse of nationalcurrencies and a rise in unemployment.Industries may fail to compete in a morecompetitive environment due to excessiveprotection in the past. Wage disparitybetween skilled and unskilled labor mayescalate and developing countries may onlybe able to attract polluting industries.The Extent of GlobalizationHow well connected is the world economy?Is globalization today different fromprevious episodes? These questions areassessed below.Trade in Goods and ServicesFalling trade barriers and advances in thetechnologies of communication andtransportation have brought the world muchcloser. Aggregate data show that the ratio ofexports and imports to GDP has increasedsharply, especially in the period following1972 (Figure1.1). Further, the data tends tounderestimate the extent of worldintegration, in view of the increasing shareof non-traded goods and services (e.g.education, health, finance, insurance, realestate and domestic trade) in the GDP ofmost economies. While developed countriesare trading more with the rest of the world,so are developing countries. Developingcountries are, in addition, now exporting14 -Egypt <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Development</strong> Report 2000/2001