23.11.2012 Views

Trimellitate Category; Revised Summaries - US Environmental ...

Trimellitate Category; Revised Summaries - US Environmental ...

Trimellitate Category; Revised Summaries - US Environmental ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

I Iden tilyr<br />

. Rems rks:<br />

METHOD<br />

.<br />

l<br />

.<br />

.<br />

I<br />

.<br />

.<br />

l<br />

.<br />

*<br />

.<br />

.<br />

I<br />

.<br />

l<br />

+<br />

><br />

Tris(Zethylhexpl}bcnzene-1,2,4-trica~xylale<br />

Source: Nuoplaz 6959<br />

Purity: 98.2% (GCEID) 97.97G (HFLC)<br />

impurities were detected at level than 0.1~O.S%, one bcingdi(Zethy~hexyl)<br />

phthalate (DEHP).<br />

Melhod: l3II3RA SUndard Operating Prcxcdurcs<br />

Test type: Repeat Dose Toxicity<br />

GLP: Ytrs<br />

Ytar: 1984<br />

Species: Rat<br />

Strain: Fischer 344<br />

Rouie of administration Oral<br />

I’hses/concentrarion levels: O(O), 0.2{184), 1).67(650) and Z(182-5) 5% (mflg bwldayj<br />

VhicIe: Rodent die1<br />

Sex; Male & Female<br />

Exposure period; 28 days<br />

Prcqucncy o,P treatment: Once daily<br />

Control group and trratmcnC:Dietary level 0% and reference ccunpund DEEP 0.67%.<br />

I%st exposure olmmhn period:None<br />

Duration of test: Males and females; for28 clays<br />

Statistical methods: The contrai and TOTM treated groups were subject 10 analysis csf<br />

variance, and if this was signjfitiant the treated groups were c-ompanzd with<br />

the contio~s using the Least Significant DiffCrencc test.<br />

The controls and DEHP groups wex compared using 8 two-tail& pooled<br />

student t test wilh WelcHs correction. In ssll cased a probability levei of<br />

P4l.05 was taken to indicate statistical significance.<br />

Study Design: Vehick DieI<br />

SmcBi~e gm.p and mwws ~hsy were crbded: None<br />

Clinical obsmurionsper$mwd and frquency:<br />

Body wt. was recorded immediately prior 10 the first exposure and again for each<br />

animal 1,3, 7,10, 14, 17, 21, 24, 27b days.<br />

Twice each day the animals were observed in their cages forvariations in behaviour<br />

or cmditiors and once weeklq’ a more dnailed examinaliun was made at rhe lime of<br />

-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!