Trimellitate Category; Revised Summaries - US Environmental ...
Trimellitate Category; Revised Summaries - US Environmental ...
Trimellitate Category; Revised Summaries - US Environmental ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
I Iden tilyr<br />
. Rems rks:<br />
METHOD<br />
.<br />
l<br />
.<br />
.<br />
I<br />
.<br />
.<br />
l<br />
.<br />
*<br />
.<br />
.<br />
I<br />
.<br />
l<br />
+<br />
><br />
Tris(Zethylhexpl}bcnzene-1,2,4-trica~xylale<br />
Source: Nuoplaz 6959<br />
Purity: 98.2% (GCEID) 97.97G (HFLC)<br />
impurities were detected at level than 0.1~O.S%, one bcingdi(Zethy~hexyl)<br />
phthalate (DEHP).<br />
Melhod: l3II3RA SUndard Operating Prcxcdurcs<br />
Test type: Repeat Dose Toxicity<br />
GLP: Ytrs<br />
Ytar: 1984<br />
Species: Rat<br />
Strain: Fischer 344<br />
Rouie of administration Oral<br />
I’hses/concentrarion levels: O(O), 0.2{184), 1).67(650) and Z(182-5) 5% (mflg bwldayj<br />
VhicIe: Rodent die1<br />
Sex; Male & Female<br />
Exposure period; 28 days<br />
Prcqucncy o,P treatment: Once daily<br />
Control group and trratmcnC:Dietary level 0% and reference ccunpund DEEP 0.67%.<br />
I%st exposure olmmhn period:None<br />
Duration of test: Males and females; for28 clays<br />
Statistical methods: The contrai and TOTM treated groups were subject 10 analysis csf<br />
variance, and if this was signjfitiant the treated groups were c-ompanzd with<br />
the contio~s using the Least Significant DiffCrencc test.<br />
The controls and DEHP groups wex compared using 8 two-tail& pooled<br />
student t test wilh WelcHs correction. In ssll cased a probability levei of<br />
P4l.05 was taken to indicate statistical significance.<br />
Study Design: Vehick DieI<br />
SmcBi~e gm.p and mwws ~hsy were crbded: None<br />
Clinical obsmurionsper$mwd and frquency:<br />
Body wt. was recorded immediately prior 10 the first exposure and again for each<br />
animal 1,3, 7,10, 14, 17, 21, 24, 27b days.<br />
Twice each day the animals were observed in their cages forvariations in behaviour<br />
or cmditiors and once weeklq’ a more dnailed examinaliun was made at rhe lime of<br />
-