11.07.2015 Views

pdf [5.3MB] - Department of Families, Housing, Community Services

pdf [5.3MB] - Department of Families, Housing, Community Services

pdf [5.3MB] - Department of Families, Housing, Community Services

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

social and emotional development <strong>of</strong> children (various studies are mentioned by Dawe andFrye, 2008). Further, mothers imprisoned with their children can display increasedbehavioural problems including aggression, frequent fighting and hostility and actingout/withdrawal. Some studies also note an impact on student academic performance.In this recent study, twelve women recruited from correctional settings commenced theprogram, with eight completing treatment. Nine <strong>of</strong> the twelve women contacted were stillincarcerated and commenced the PUP program prior to their release, continuing it into theirpost-release period. The mean age <strong>of</strong> the participating women was approximately 30 years,and the mean age <strong>of</strong> the target child was 5.6 years (range <strong>of</strong> 2-12 years). Informationcollection, similar to the other studies, occurred through both an interview and self-reportingquestionnaires completed at initial assessment, completion <strong>of</strong> treatment, and follow up.Maternal functioning, parent-child functioning and child behaviour outcomes were analysed.Results <strong>of</strong> this study found that participation in the program was associated with significantimprovements across outcome measures. In particular, improvements in maternal emotionalwellbeing, stress levels in the parenting role and child behaviour outcomes were reported.Reductions were found in child abuse potential and problem child behaviours. It is reportedthat the gains for most women appeared to be maintained in the short term.The means and SDs for outcome indicators reported at different stages <strong>of</strong> the study (pre-treatment, post-treatment and follow-up) are presented in Table 3-26.TABLE 3-26: MEANS AND SDS FOR OUTCOME MEASURES – WOMEN PRISONERS STUDYSource: Dawe and Frye (2008).Study – Effectiveness for families referred by child protection servicesA recent study on the PUP program (Hartnett and Dawe, 2008) sought to determine theeffectiveness <strong>of</strong> the PUP program when applied to families referred by child protectionservices. The results from this study are significant in terms <strong>of</strong> assessing changes in childabuse outcomes stemming from PUP intervention. Ten families were referred for treatmentby a non-government agency providing services for parents and children <strong>of</strong> families involvedin the child protection system. Seven <strong>of</strong> these families were single-parent. Similar to theother studies, outcomes were assessed in the parental functioning, child behaviour andsocial context domains. Pre-intervention and post-intervention analysis <strong>of</strong> outcomes wascarried out. Statistically significant improvement was found in all measures over the threemonth period, except the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS) and the problemswith child and self subscale <strong>of</strong> the CAPI scale (Table 3-27).97

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!