pdf [5.3MB] - Department of Families, Housing, Community Services

More documents

Recommendations

Info

National Evaluation of Sure Start Team (2008) National Evaluation Summary, The Impact ofSure Start Local Programmes on Three Year Olds and Their Families,NESS/2008/SF/027.Nordhaus W (1999) The Health of Nations: The Contribution of Improved Health to LivingStandards, research papers presented at a conference sponsored by Lasker/FundingFirst, December, Department of Economics, Yale University, downloaded 2 April 2003from www.laskerfoundation.org/reports/pdf/healthofnations.pdfNowak C, Heinrichs N (2008) ‘A comprehensive meta-analysis of Triple P-Positive ParentingProgram Using Hierarchial Linear Modeling: Effectiveness and Moderating Variables’Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 11:114-144.NSW Department of Community Services (2006) Early Years program evaluations: The UKevidence base, Seminar Notes, July.O’Brien MP, Gordon JL, Bearden CE, Lopez SR, Kopelowicz A, Cannon TD (2006) ‘Positivefamily environment predicts improvements in symptoms and social functioning amongadolescents at imminent risk for onset of psychosis’ Schizophr Res 81:2-3.Olson DH (1990) ‘Family circumplex model: theory, assessment, and intervention’ JapaneseJournal of Family Psychology, 4:55-64.Olson DH, Gorall DM, Tiesel JW (2006) FACESInnovations, Inc.IV Package, Minneapolis, MN: LifePedersen DE, Minnotte KL, Kiger G, Mannon SE (2009) ‘Workplace Policy and Environment,Family Role Quality and Positive Family-to-Work Spillover’ J Fam Econ Iss 30:80-89.Prior M, Sanson A, Oberklaid F, Smart D, Toumbourou J (2005) The AustralianTemperament Project: A longitudinal, prospective study of temperament anddevelopment in a representative sample of the whole population of Victoria 1983-2005,Presentation.Productivity Commission (2003) Evaluation of the Pharmaceutical Industry InvestmentProgram, Research Report, AusInfo, CanberraRinger F, Crittenden PM (2007) ‘Eating Disorders and Attachment: The Effects of HiddenFamily Processes on Eating Disorders’ Eur Eat Disorders Rev, 15:119-130.Rodrigues N, Patterson JM (2007) ‘Impact of Severity of a Child’s Chronic Condition on theFunctioning of Two-Parent Families’ Journal of Pediatric Psychology 32(4):417-426.RPRRPRConsulting (2003) I’m looking at the Future – Evaluation Report of Reconnect, for theAustralian Government Department of Family and Community Services.Consulting (2004) Evaluation of Youth Activities Services and Family Liaison Worker(YAS/FLW) Program, Final Report to the Department of Family and CommunityServices.Rutter M (2006) ‘Is Sure Start an effective preventive intervention?’ Child and AdolescentMental Health, 11:135–141.108
Sanders MR (2003) ‘Triple P – Positive Parenting Program: A population approach topromoting competent parenting’ Australian e-Journal for the Advancement of MentalHealth, 2(3).Sanders MR (2008) ‘Triple P-Positive Parenting Program as a Public Health Approach toStrengthening Parenting’ Journal of Family Psychology 22(3):506-517.Sanders MR, Prinz RJ (2008) ‘Ethical and Professional Issues in the Implementation ofPopulation-Level Parenting Interventions’ Clin PSychol Sci Prac 15:130-136.Sanson A, Nicholson J, Ungerer J, Zubrick S, Wilson K, Ainley J, Berthelson D, Bittman M,Broom D, Harrison L, Rodgers B, Sawyer M, Silburn Sven, Strazdins L, Vimpani G,Wake M (2002) Introducing the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children, LSACDiscussion Paper No 1, Australian Institute of Family Studies, June.Schelling (1968) ‘The life you save may be your own’ in Chase SB (ed) Problems in publicexpenditure and analysis, Brookings Institution, Washington DC, p127-162.Scott S, Knapp M, Henderson J, Maughan B (2001) ‘Financial cost of social exclusion: followup study of antisocial children into adulthood’, BMJ (Clinical Research Ed), 323:1-5.Scragg R, Laugesen M (2007) ‘Influence of smoking by family and best friend on adolescenttobacco smoking: results from the 2002 New Zealand national survey of Year 10students’ Aust N Z J Public Health; 31:217-223.Silburn SR, Zubrick SR (1996) ‘The WA Child Health Survey: Methodology and PolicyImplications’ presented at Fifth Australian Family Research Conference ‘FamilyResearch: Pathways to Policy’, Brisbane 27-29 November 1996Skinner H, Steinhauer P, Sitarenios G (2000) ‘Family Assessment Measure (FAM) andProcess Model of Family Functioning’ Journal of Family Therapy, 22:190-210.Slack-Smith J (2008) Report from the Survey of Communities for Children committeemembers: Impact of Communities for Children in Dubbo, Narromine and Wellington.Snoek HM, Engels RCME, Janssens JMAM, van Strien T (2007) ‘Parental behaviour andadolescents’ emotional eating’ Appetite 49:223-230.Soriano G, Clark H, Wise S (2008) Promising Practice Profiles, Final Report prepared for theDepartment of Families, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs as part of theNational Evaluation Consortium.Spelten E, Sprangers M, Verbeek J (2002) ‘Factors reported to influence the return to workof cancer survivors: A literature review’ Psycho-Oncology, 11:124-131.Stam H, Grootenhuis M, Last B (2005) ‘The course of life of survivors ofchildhood cancer’Psycho-Oncology, 14:227-238.Stewart A, Dennison S, Waterson E (2004) Pathways from child maltreatment to juvenileoffending School of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Griffith University.Stone W, Gray M, Hughes J (2003) Social capital at work – How family, friends and civic tiesrelate to labour market outcomes, Australian Institute of Family Studies, ResearchPaper No 31, April.109
Page 1 and 2:
June 2009Positive Family Functionin
Page 3 and 4:
3.8 Reconnect......................
Page 5 and 6:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSAccess Economics wo
Page 7 and 8:
NESSNFFNPVPFFPIMTriple-PPUPRCTREACh
Page 9 and 10:
A simple definition of PFF could no
Page 11 and 12:
ehaviour during youth and later in
Page 13 and 14:
Alternatives to such a partnership
Page 15 and 16:
ooCommunities for childrenInvest an
Page 17 and 18:
1. MEANING AND MEASUREMENTWorking d
Page 19 and 20:
Fletcher (2007) presented the New Z
Page 21 and 22:
DomainEmotionalGovernanceEngagement
Page 23 and 24:
ModelTABLE 1-2: THEORETICAL MODELS
Page 25 and 26:
In times of crisis we can turn to e
Page 27 and 28:
2. MEASURING OUTCOMESImpacts from F
Page 29 and 30:
TABLE 2-1: MATERNAL AND PATERNAL IN
Page 31 and 32:
Parental limit setting, family conf
Page 33 and 34:
studied in the literature and separ
Page 35 and 36:
TABLE 2-7: FAMILY RISK FACTORS ASSO
Page 37 and 38:
FIGURE 2-4: PARENTAL INPUTS (AGE TH
Page 39 and 40:
exacerbated by the formation of aff
Page 41 and 42:
Productivity outcomes appear to be
Page 43 and 44:
Danish National Longitudinal Study
Page 45 and 46:
Key research question 14: how the i
Page 47 and 48:
ut could not (until further Waves o
Page 49 and 50:
FIGURE 2-6: LONGITUDINAL PATHWAYS T
Page 51 and 52:
only be useful in providing informa
Page 53 and 54:
FIGURE 2-9: CONCEPTUAL MAP FOR VALU
Page 55 and 56:
Productivity losses would best be m
Page 57 and 58:
Short term productivity costsThe fr
Page 59 and 60:
The expected retirement age by the
Page 61 and 62:
(discussed previously in Section 2.
Page 63 and 64:
Aids and home modificationsAlthough
Page 65 and 66:
The extensive literature in this fi
Page 67 and 68:
In discounting healthy life and oth
Page 69 and 70:
proximal risk factors are those tha
Page 71 and 72:
ages of 18-24 months and between 4
Page 73 and 74: TABLE 3-4: MATERNITY IMMUNISATION A
Page 75 and 76: Family Relationship Centres are a f
Page 77 and 78: Increased contentment in children w
Page 79 and 80: TABLE 3-7: FAMILY DISPUTE RESOLUTIO
Page 81 and 82: 3.3.1 COMMUNITIES FOR CHILDRENProgr
Page 83 and 84: Quantitative and qualitative data w
Page 85 and 86: This initiative developed out of a
Page 87 and 88: FIGURE 3-2: DIAGRAM OF TRIPLE P SYS
Page 89 and 90: TABLE 3-11: RESULTS OF META-ANALYSE
Page 91 and 92: This section on early childhood int
Page 93 and 94: Table 3-14 displays a summary of th
Page 95 and 96: TABLE 3-15: BCR OF ECE PROGRAMSSour
Page 97 and 98: 3.6 PEEL CHILD HEALTH SURVEYThe Pee
Page 99 and 100: Research on efficacy - Evaluation o
Page 101 and 102: Education participation levels rema
Page 103 and 104: For FLW, outcomes assessment was re
Page 105 and 106: whether children, families and comm
Page 107 and 108: Mothers of 36 month olds were repor
Page 109 and 110: The effects associated with SSLPs a
Page 111 and 112: social context of the family.Self-r
Page 113 and 114: social and emotional development of
Page 115 and 116: analyses can be broken down further
Page 117 and 118: 4. CONCLUSIONThe method proposed fo
Page 119 and 120: Australian Institute of Family Stud
Page 121 and 122: Duncan J, Bowden C, Smith AB (2005)
Page 123: Mathers C, Vos T, Stevenson C (1999
show all

pdf [5.3MB] - Department of Families, Housing, Community Services

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?