pdf [5.3MB] - Department of Families, Housing, Community Services

More documents

Recommendations

Info

ACRONYMSABSADHDAIFSAIHWAPGARATPATSIBCRCAPICBACEACfCCUADALYDWLECEERGFACES (I, II, III)FADFaHCSIAFAMFCUFFFLWFRSPGDPHILDAICERIFIRSLSACLSAYMCRSMCSIFFMICSAustralian Bureau of Statisticsattention deficit-hyperactivity disorderAustralian Institute of Family StudiesAustralian Institute of Health and WelfareAmerican Pediatric Gross Assessment RecordAustralian Temperament ProjectAboriginal and Torres Strait Islanderbenefit/cost ratioChild Abuse Potential Inventorycost benefit analysiscost effectiveness analysisCommunities for Childrencost utility analysisdisability adjusted life year(s)deadweight lossesEarly Childhood EducationExpert Reference GroupFamily Adaptability and Cohesion Scales (I, II, III)Family Assessment DeviceAustralian Government Department of Families, Housing, CommunityServices and Indigenous AffairsFamily Assessment MeasureFamily Check-Upfamily functioningFamily Liaison WorkerFamily Relationship Services Programgross domestic productHousehold, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia studyincremental cost effectiveness ratioIowa Family Interaction Rating ScalesLongitudinal Study of Australian ChildrenLongitudinal Survey of Australian YouthMcMaster Clinical Rating ScaleMcMaster Structured Interview of Family FunctioningMealtime Interaction Coding System
NESSNFFNPVPFFPIMTriple-PPUPRCTREAChSCRGSPSDsSSLPTLCUKUSVSL(Y)WHOWTPYASYLDYLLNational Evaluation of Sure Startnegative family functioningnet present valuepositive family functioningproject inception meetingPositive Parenting ProgramParents Under Pressurerandomised control trialResponding Early Assisting ChildrenSteering Committee for the Review of Government Service Provisionstandard deviationsSure Start Local Programstender loving careUnited KingdomUnited States (of America)Value of a Statistical Life (Year)World Health Organizationwillingness to payYouth Activities ServiceYear(s) of healthy life Lost due to DisabilityYear(s) of Life Lost due to premature death
Page 1 and 2: June 2009Positive Family Functionin
Page 3 and 4: 3.8 Reconnect......................
Page 5: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSAccess Economics wo
Page 9 and 10: A simple definition of PFF could no
Page 11 and 12: ehaviour during youth and later in
Page 13 and 14: Alternatives to such a partnership
Page 15 and 16: ooCommunities for childrenInvest an
Page 17 and 18: 1. MEANING AND MEASUREMENTWorking d
Page 19 and 20: Fletcher (2007) presented the New Z
Page 21 and 22: DomainEmotionalGovernanceEngagement
Page 23 and 24: ModelTABLE 1-2: THEORETICAL MODELS
Page 25 and 26: In times of crisis we can turn to e
Page 27 and 28: 2. MEASURING OUTCOMESImpacts from F
Page 29 and 30: TABLE 2-1: MATERNAL AND PATERNAL IN
Page 31 and 32: Parental limit setting, family conf
Page 33 and 34: studied in the literature and separ
Page 35 and 36: TABLE 2-7: FAMILY RISK FACTORS ASSO
Page 37 and 38: FIGURE 2-4: PARENTAL INPUTS (AGE TH
Page 39 and 40: exacerbated by the formation of aff
Page 41 and 42: Productivity outcomes appear to be
Page 43 and 44: Danish National Longitudinal Study
Page 45 and 46: Key research question 14: how the i
Page 47 and 48: ut could not (until further Waves o
Page 49 and 50: FIGURE 2-6: LONGITUDINAL PATHWAYS T
Page 51 and 52: only be useful in providing informa
Page 53 and 54: FIGURE 2-9: CONCEPTUAL MAP FOR VALU
Page 55 and 56: Productivity losses would best be m
Page 57 and 58:
Short term productivity costsThe fr
Page 59 and 60:
The expected retirement age by the
Page 61 and 62:
(discussed previously in Section 2.
Page 63 and 64:
Aids and home modificationsAlthough
Page 65 and 66:
The extensive literature in this fi
Page 67 and 68:
In discounting healthy life and oth
Page 69 and 70:
proximal risk factors are those tha
Page 71 and 72:
ages of 18-24 months and between 4
Page 73 and 74:
TABLE 3-4: MATERNITY IMMUNISATION A
Page 75 and 76:
Family Relationship Centres are a f
Page 77 and 78:
Increased contentment in children w
Page 79 and 80:
TABLE 3-7: FAMILY DISPUTE RESOLUTIO
Page 81 and 82:
3.3.1 COMMUNITIES FOR CHILDRENProgr
Page 83 and 84:
Quantitative and qualitative data w
Page 85 and 86:
This initiative developed out of a
Page 87 and 88:
FIGURE 3-2: DIAGRAM OF TRIPLE P SYS
Page 89 and 90:
TABLE 3-11: RESULTS OF META-ANALYSE
Page 91 and 92:
This section on early childhood int
Page 93 and 94:
Table 3-14 displays a summary of th
Page 95 and 96:
TABLE 3-15: BCR OF ECE PROGRAMSSour
Page 97 and 98:
3.6 PEEL CHILD HEALTH SURVEYThe Pee
Page 99 and 100:
Research on efficacy - Evaluation o
Page 101 and 102:
Education participation levels rema
Page 103 and 104:
For FLW, outcomes assessment was re
Page 105 and 106:
whether children, families and comm
Page 107 and 108:
Mothers of 36 month olds were repor
Page 109 and 110:
The effects associated with SSLPs a
Page 111 and 112:
social context of the family.Self-r
Page 113 and 114:
social and emotional development of
Page 115 and 116:
analyses can be broken down further
Page 117 and 118:
4. CONCLUSIONThe method proposed fo
Page 119 and 120:
Australian Institute of Family Stud
Page 121 and 122:
Duncan J, Bowden C, Smith AB (2005)
Page 123 and 124:
Mathers C, Vos T, Stevenson C (1999
Page 125 and 126:
Sanders MR (2003) ‘Triple P - Pos
show all

pdf [5.3MB] - Department of Families, Housing, Community Services

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?