11.07.2015 Views

pdf [5.3MB] - Department of Families, Housing, Community Services

pdf [5.3MB] - Department of Families, Housing, Community Services

pdf [5.3MB] - Department of Families, Housing, Community Services

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Research on efficacy – Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Reconnect (2003)A Reconnect evaluation was carried out in 2003 to provide insight into (<strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Familyand <strong>Community</strong> <strong>Services</strong>, FACS 2003): outcomes for young people and families using the program and the extent to whichoutcomes were sustained over time; the extent to which Reconnect contributed to an improvement in the communitycapacity for early intervention in youth homelessness; the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> strategies used by Reconnect in working with young people,families and communities and; the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the program’s management.This comprehensive evaluation provides a good foundation for assessing the effectiveness <strong>of</strong>the Reconnect program. Data were collected through a variety <strong>of</strong> sources and previousstudies <strong>of</strong> the program (FACS, 2003). Two longitudinal studies investigated client outcomes and community-capacity buildingoutcomes. The Statistical Report on the Longitudinal Survey <strong>of</strong> Reconnect Clients byRPR Consulting (2003) was focused on clients. The Report <strong>of</strong> the ReconnectLongitudinal Study: Building <strong>Community</strong> Capacity for Early Intervention by RPRConsulting (2003) examined the impact <strong>of</strong> Reconnect on building community capacity. There were assessments <strong>of</strong> the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> individual Reconnect services. There was also a report on good practice emerging from the program. Two case study reports examined how Reconnect services worked collaboratively withother service providers.The two longitudinal studies provided key inputs into the evaluation. The Statistical Reporton the Longitudinal Survey <strong>of</strong> Reconnect Clients was carried out by surveying new clientsabout their lives and experiences at two points in time – in the early stages <strong>of</strong> support and atthe conclusion <strong>of</strong> support (approximately ten months apart). Wave one <strong>of</strong> the surveycommenced in November 2001 and Wave two in October 2002. There were 1,001 casesselected to participate, 516 <strong>of</strong> which were new clients and 485 clients whose support periodhad ended. Cases could consist <strong>of</strong> a young person only, adult(s) only or both.The client longitudinal study evaluation is <strong>of</strong> particular relevance for assessing the outcomefrom Reconnect in terms <strong>of</strong> improving family, work, education/training and communityengagement. The following figure illustrates the prevalence <strong>of</strong> various factors acrossReconnect client cases, useful in ascertaining the types <strong>of</strong> issues clients were dealing with,and perhaps the NFF characteristics that could be influenced by the Reconnect program.83

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!