pdf [5.3MB] - Department of Families, Housing, Community Services

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Buysse WH (1997) ‘Behaviour problems and relationships with family and peers duringadolescence’ Journal of Adolescence 20:645-659.Carneiro P, Heckman J (2003) Human Capital Policy NBER working paper series, NationalBureau of Economic Research.Catalano R, Fleming C, Haggerty K, Abbott R (2007) The Relationships between the FamilyEnvironment during Adolescence and Self-reported Crime in Emerging Adulthood:Results from the Raising Healthy Children, presented at the American Society ofCriminology, Atlanta Marriott Marquis, Atlanta, Georgia, Nov 14.Catalano RF, Gainey RR, Fleming CB, Haggerty KP, Johnson NO (1999) ‘An experimentalintervention with families of substance abusers: One-year follow-up of the focus onfamilies project’ Addiction, 94(2):241-254.Cutler DM, Richardson E (1998) The Value of Health: 1970-1990, JCPR Working Paper 28,prepared for the AEA session on ‘What we get for health care spending’ downloadablefrom www.jcpr.org/wpfiles/value.pdf.Dadds MR (1994) Families, children and the development of dysfunction; Thousand Oaks,California: Saga Publications Inc.Dawe S, Frye S (2008) ‘Interventions for women prisoners and their children in the postreleaseperiod’ Clinical Psychologist, 12(3):99-108.Dawe S, Hartnett P (2008) ‘Reducing child abuse potential in families identified by socialservices: implications for assessment and treatment’, Brief Treatment and CrisisIntervention, 8(3):226-235.Dawe S, Hartnett P (2007) ‘Reducing potential for child abuse among methadone maintainedparents: Results from a randomized controlled trial’, Journal of Substance AbuseTreatment, 32:381-390.Dawe S, Hartnett P, Rendalls V (2004) ‘Program Profile: The Parents Under PressureProgram’, Australian Institute of Family Studies, NCPC Newsletter, 12(1):9-13.Dawe S, Hartnett P, Rendalls V, Staiger P (2003), ‘Improving family functioning and childoutcome in methadone maintained families: the Parents Under Pressure program’,Drug and Alcohol Review 22:299-307.de Graaf I, Speetjens P, Smit F, de Wolff M, Tavecchio L (2008) ‘Effectiveness of the TripleP Positive Parenting Program on Behavioural Problems in Children: A Meta-Analysis’Behav Modif 32(5):714-735.Department of Health and Ageing (2003) Returns on investment in public health: Anepidemiological and economic analysis, Report to the Department of Health andAgeing by Applied Economics.Dickstein S, Hayden LC, Schiller M, Seifer R, San Antonio W (1994) Providence FamilyStudy mealtime family interaction coding system. Adapted from the McMaster ClinicalRating Scale. East Providence, RI: EP Bradley Hospital.Donovan R, Wood L, Leavy J (2007) A national communication strategy for improving thewellbeing of children and young people, Australian Research Alliance for Children andYouth.104
Duncan J, Bowden C, Smith AB (2005) Early childhood centres and family resilience;Wellington: Ministry of Social Development.Edgar D (1992) Conceptualising Family Life and Family Policies; Family Matters32(August):28-37Epstein NB, Bishop DS, Baldwin LM (1982) ‘McMaster Model of Family Functioning: A viewof the normal family’ in Walsh F (ed), Normal Family Processes, Guilford family therapyseries (pp115-151), New York: Guildford Press.Ermisch J (2008) Origins of social immobility and inequality: parenting and early childdevelopment, National Institute Economics Review, 205:62-71.Esping-Anderson G (2008) ‘Childhood investments and skill formation’, Int Tax Finance15:19-44.Fergusson DM, Horwood LJ (2002) ‘Male and female offending trajectories’, Developmentand Psychopathology, 14:159-177.Fiese BH, Spagnola M, Everhart R (in press) ‘Family context in developmental andbehavioural paediatrics’ in Wolraich M, Drotar D, Dworkin PH, Perrin E (eds) Handbookof developmental and behavioural paediatrics, New York: Elsevier.Fletcher M (2007) ‘Issues in developing a conceptual framework for Family Wellbeing’,presented at National Family Wellbeing Symposium, ANU 20-21 June.Furnham A, Cheng H (2000) ‘Perceived parental behaviour, self-esteem and happiness’ SocPsychiatr Epidemiol, 35:463-470.Gardner W, Nutting PA, Kelleher KJ, Werner JJ, Farley T, Stewart L, Martsell M, Orzano J(2000) ‘Does the Family APGAR effectively measure family functioning?’ J Fam Pract50:19-25.Garmiene A, Zemaitiene N, Zaborskis A (2006) ‘Family time, parental behaviour model andthe initiation of smoking and alcohol use by ten-year-old children: an epidemiologicalstudy in Kaunas, Lithuania’ BMC Public Health 6:287.Greenley RN, Holmbeck GN, Rose BM (2006) ‘Predictors of Parenting BehaviourTrajectories Among Families of Young Adolescents with and without Spina Bifida’Journal of Pediatric Psychology 31(10):1057-1071.Harnett, PH, Day C. (2008) ‘Developing pathways to assist parents exit the child protectionsystem in Australia’ Clinical Psychologist 12(3):79-85.Hill AJ (2002) ‘Developmental issues in attitudes to food and diet’ Proceedings of theNutrition Society 61:259-266.Hipwell AE, Murray L, Ducournau P, Stein A (2004) ‘The effects of maternal depression andparental conflict on children’s peer play’ Child: Care, Health and Development31(1):11-23.Holahan CJ, Moos RH (1983) ‘The quality of social support: Measures of family and workrelationships’ British Journal of Clinical Psychology 22:157-162.Isaacs JB (2006) Cost effective investments in children, The Brookings Institution.105
Page 1 and 2:
June 2009Positive Family Functionin
Page 3 and 4:
3.8 Reconnect......................
Page 5 and 6:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSAccess Economics wo
Page 7 and 8:
NESSNFFNPVPFFPIMTriple-PPUPRCTREACh
Page 9 and 10:
A simple definition of PFF could no
Page 11 and 12:
ehaviour during youth and later in
Page 13 and 14:
Alternatives to such a partnership
Page 15 and 16:
ooCommunities for childrenInvest an
Page 17 and 18:
1. MEANING AND MEASUREMENTWorking d
Page 19 and 20:
Fletcher (2007) presented the New Z
Page 21 and 22:
DomainEmotionalGovernanceEngagement
Page 23 and 24:
ModelTABLE 1-2: THEORETICAL MODELS
Page 25 and 26:
In times of crisis we can turn to e
Page 27 and 28:
2. MEASURING OUTCOMESImpacts from F
Page 29 and 30:
TABLE 2-1: MATERNAL AND PATERNAL IN
Page 31 and 32:
Parental limit setting, family conf
Page 33 and 34:
studied in the literature and separ
Page 35 and 36:
TABLE 2-7: FAMILY RISK FACTORS ASSO
Page 37 and 38:
FIGURE 2-4: PARENTAL INPUTS (AGE TH
Page 39 and 40:
exacerbated by the formation of aff
Page 41 and 42:
Productivity outcomes appear to be
Page 43 and 44:
Danish National Longitudinal Study
Page 45 and 46:
Key research question 14: how the i
Page 47 and 48:
ut could not (until further Waves o
Page 49 and 50:
FIGURE 2-6: LONGITUDINAL PATHWAYS T
Page 51 and 52:
only be useful in providing informa
Page 53 and 54:
FIGURE 2-9: CONCEPTUAL MAP FOR VALU
Page 55 and 56:
Productivity losses would best be m
Page 57 and 58:
Short term productivity costsThe fr
Page 59 and 60:
The expected retirement age by the
Page 61 and 62:
(discussed previously in Section 2.
Page 63 and 64:
Aids and home modificationsAlthough
Page 65 and 66:
The extensive literature in this fi
Page 67 and 68:
In discounting healthy life and oth
Page 69 and 70: proximal risk factors are those tha
Page 71 and 72: ages of 18-24 months and between 4
Page 73 and 74: TABLE 3-4: MATERNITY IMMUNISATION A
Page 75 and 76: Family Relationship Centres are a f
Page 77 and 78: Increased contentment in children w
Page 79 and 80: TABLE 3-7: FAMILY DISPUTE RESOLUTIO
Page 81 and 82: 3.3.1 COMMUNITIES FOR CHILDRENProgr
Page 83 and 84: Quantitative and qualitative data w
Page 85 and 86: This initiative developed out of a
Page 87 and 88: FIGURE 3-2: DIAGRAM OF TRIPLE P SYS
Page 89 and 90: TABLE 3-11: RESULTS OF META-ANALYSE
Page 91 and 92: This section on early childhood int
Page 93 and 94: Table 3-14 displays a summary of th
Page 95 and 96: TABLE 3-15: BCR OF ECE PROGRAMSSour
Page 97 and 98: 3.6 PEEL CHILD HEALTH SURVEYThe Pee
Page 99 and 100: Research on efficacy - Evaluation o
Page 101 and 102: Education participation levels rema
Page 103 and 104: For FLW, outcomes assessment was re
Page 105 and 106: whether children, families and comm
Page 107 and 108: Mothers of 36 month olds were repor
Page 109 and 110: The effects associated with SSLPs a
Page 111 and 112: social context of the family.Self-r
Page 113 and 114: social and emotional development of
Page 115 and 116: analyses can be broken down further
Page 117 and 118: 4. CONCLUSIONThe method proposed fo
Page 119: Australian Institute of Family Stud
Page 123 and 124: Mathers C, Vos T, Stevenson C (1999
Page 125 and 126: Sanders MR (2003) ‘Triple P - Pos
show all

pdf [5.3MB] - Department of Families, Housing, Community Services

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?