- Page 1 and 2: June 2009Positive Family Functionin
- Page 3: 3.8 Reconnect......................
- Page 7 and 8: NESSNFFNPVPFFPIMTriple-PPUPRCTREACh
- Page 9 and 10: A simple definition of PFF could no
- Page 11 and 12: ehaviour during youth and later in
- Page 13 and 14: Alternatives to such a partnership
- Page 15 and 16: ooCommunities for childrenInvest an
- Page 17 and 18: 1. MEANING AND MEASUREMENTWorking d
- Page 19 and 20: Fletcher (2007) presented the New Z
- Page 21 and 22: DomainEmotionalGovernanceEngagement
- Page 23 and 24: ModelTABLE 1-2: THEORETICAL MODELS
- Page 25 and 26: In times of crisis we can turn to e
- Page 27 and 28: 2. MEASURING OUTCOMESImpacts from F
- Page 29 and 30: TABLE 2-1: MATERNAL AND PATERNAL IN
- Page 31 and 32: Parental limit setting, family conf
- Page 33 and 34: studied in the literature and separ
- Page 35 and 36: TABLE 2-7: FAMILY RISK FACTORS ASSO
- Page 37 and 38: FIGURE 2-4: PARENTAL INPUTS (AGE TH
- Page 39 and 40: exacerbated by the formation of aff
- Page 41 and 42: Productivity outcomes appear to be
- Page 43 and 44: Danish National Longitudinal Study
- Page 45 and 46: Key research question 14: how the i
- Page 47 and 48: ut could not (until further Waves o
- Page 49 and 50: FIGURE 2-6: LONGITUDINAL PATHWAYS T
- Page 51 and 52: only be useful in providing informa
- Page 53 and 54: FIGURE 2-9: CONCEPTUAL MAP FOR VALU
- Page 55 and 56:
Productivity losses would best be m
- Page 57 and 58:
Short term productivity costsThe fr
- Page 59 and 60:
The expected retirement age by the
- Page 61 and 62:
(discussed previously in Section 2.
- Page 63 and 64:
Aids and home modificationsAlthough
- Page 65 and 66:
The extensive literature in this fi
- Page 67 and 68:
In discounting healthy life and oth
- Page 69 and 70:
proximal risk factors are those tha
- Page 71 and 72:
ages of 18-24 months and between 4
- Page 73 and 74:
TABLE 3-4: MATERNITY IMMUNISATION A
- Page 75 and 76:
Family Relationship Centres are a f
- Page 77 and 78:
Increased contentment in children w
- Page 79 and 80:
TABLE 3-7: FAMILY DISPUTE RESOLUTIO
- Page 81 and 82:
3.3.1 COMMUNITIES FOR CHILDRENProgr
- Page 83 and 84:
Quantitative and qualitative data w
- Page 85 and 86:
This initiative developed out of a
- Page 87 and 88:
FIGURE 3-2: DIAGRAM OF TRIPLE P SYS
- Page 89 and 90:
TABLE 3-11: RESULTS OF META-ANALYSE
- Page 91 and 92:
This section on early childhood int
- Page 93 and 94:
Table 3-14 displays a summary of th
- Page 95 and 96:
TABLE 3-15: BCR OF ECE PROGRAMSSour
- Page 97 and 98:
3.6 PEEL CHILD HEALTH SURVEYThe Pee
- Page 99 and 100:
Research on efficacy - Evaluation o
- Page 101 and 102:
Education participation levels rema
- Page 103 and 104:
For FLW, outcomes assessment was re
- Page 105 and 106:
whether children, families and comm
- Page 107 and 108:
Mothers of 36 month olds were repor
- Page 109 and 110:
The effects associated with SSLPs a
- Page 111 and 112:
social context of the family.Self-r
- Page 113 and 114:
social and emotional development of
- Page 115 and 116:
analyses can be broken down further
- Page 117 and 118:
4. CONCLUSIONThe method proposed fo
- Page 119 and 120:
Australian Institute of Family Stud
- Page 121 and 122:
Duncan J, Bowden C, Smith AB (2005)
- Page 123 and 124:
Mathers C, Vos T, Stevenson C (1999
- Page 125 and 126:
Sanders MR (2003) ‘Triple P - Pos