pdf [5.3MB] - Department of Families, Housing, Community Services

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Jespersen E (2007) ‘A framework for comparison of child wellbeing in rich countries;UNICEF’ presented at National Family Wellbeing Symposium, ANU 20-21 June.Karoly LA, Kilburn MR (2008) The Economics of Early Childhood Policy: What the DismalScience Has to Say About Investing in Children RAND Corporation.Karoly LA, Bigelow JH (2005) The economics of investing in universal preschool education inCalifornia RAND Corporation.Kazak AE, Rourke MT, Crump TA (2003) ‘Families and other systems in paediatricpsychology’ in Roberts M (ed) Handbook of paediatric psychology (pp159-175) NewYork: Guildford Press.Kazak AE, Simms S, Rourke MT (2002) ‘Family Systems Practice in Pediatric Psychology’Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 27(2):133-143.Koopmanschap MA, Rutten FFH, van Ineveld BM, vanRoijen L (1995) ‘The friction costmethod for measuring indirect costs of disease’ Journal of Health Economics 14:171-189.Kronenberger WG, Thompson RJ (1990) ‘Dimensions of family functioning in families withchronically ill children: A higher order factor analysis of the family environment scale’Journal of Clinical Child Psychology 19:380-388.Laing L, Bobic N (2002) ‘Economic Costs of domestic violence: Literature Review’ AustralianDomestic and Family Violence Clearinghouse, University of New South Wales, Sydney,April.Lattimore R (1997) ‘Research and Development Fiscal Incentives in Australia: Impacts andPolicy Lessons’, Paper Presented to the OECD Conference on Policy Evaluation inInnovation, Paris, 26-27 June, 81:574-577.Laurence L, Spalter-Roth R (1996) Measuring the Costs of Domestic Violence AgainstWomen and the Cost effectiveness of Interventions: An initial assessment andproposals for further research. Washington: Institute for Women’s Policy Research.Lindahl KM, Malik NM (2001) ‘The System for Coding Interactions and Family Functioning’ inKerig P, Lindahl KM (eds), Family Observational Coding Systems: Resources forSystemic Research (pp77-91), Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Lippman L, Moore K, Guzman L, Bronte J (2007) ‘Conceptual Frameworks for a FamilyIndicator Monitoring System, Child Trends Washington, DC’ presented at NationalFamily Wellbeing Symposium, ANU 20-21 June 2007.Logie H, Hogan R, Peut A (2004) Longitudinal studies of ageing: Implications for futurestudies, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, AIHW Cat No AGE 42, Canberra.Lunkenheimer ES; Dishion TJ, Shaw DS, Connell AR, Gardner F, Wilson MN, Skuban EM(2008) ‘Collateral Benefits of the family Check-up on Early Childhood SchoolReadiness: Indirect Effects of Parents’ Positive Behaviour Support’ DevelopmentalPsychology 44(6):1737-1752.Main D, Nowels C, Cavender T, Etschmaier M, Steiner J (2005) ‘A qualitative study of workand work return in cancer survivors; Psycho-Oncology’ 14:1992-1004.106
Mathers C, Vos T, Stevenson C (1999) The burden of disease and injury in Australia,Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, AIHW Cat No PHE17, Canberra.Mayhew P (2003) Counting the Costs of Crime in Australia, Australian Institute ofCriminology No 247, April.McIntosh J, Long C (2006) Children Beyond Dispute – A Prospective Study of Outcomesfrom Child Focussed and Child Inclusive Post-Separation Family Dispute Resolution,Final Report for the Australian Government Attorney-General’s Department.Melby JN, Conger RD (2001) ‘The Iowa Family Interaction Rating Scales: InstrumentSummary’ in Kerig P, Lindahl KM (eds) Family Observational Coding Systems:Resources for Systemic Research (pp33-58), Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Melby JN, Conger RD, Book R, Rueter M, Lucy L, Repinski D et al (1998) The Iowa FamilythInteraction Rating scales (5 ed) Unpublished manuscript, Institute for Social andBehavioural Research, Iowa State University, Ames.Mihal opoulos C, Sanders MR, Turner KMT, Murphy-Brennan M, Carter R (2007) ‘Does theTriple P-Positive Parenting Program provide value for money?’ Australian and NewZealand Journal of Psychiatry, 41(3):239-246.Miller-Lewis LR, Baghurst PA, Sawyer MG, Prior MR, Clark JJ, Arney FM, Carbone JA(2006) ‘Early childhood externalising behaviour problems: child, parenting and familyrelatedpredictors over time’ J Abnorm Child Psychol 34:891-906.Mitchell L, Wylie C, Carr M (2008) Outcomes of Early Childhood Education: LiteratureReview, Report to the Ministry of Education New Zealand.Mitchell M, Piazza-Waggoner C, Modi A, Janicke D (2009) ‘Examining Short term Stability ofthe Mealtime Interaction Coding System (MICS)’ Journal of Pediatric Psychology34(1):63-68.Moffit TE (1993) ‘Adolescent-limited and life-course persistent antisocial behaviour: adevelopmental taxonomy’ Psychological Review 100:674-701.Moos R, Moos B (1994) Family Environment Scale manual (3 rd ed) Palo Alto, CA: ConsultingPsychologists Press.Murphy KM, Topel R (1999) The Economic Value of Medical Research, University ofChicago Business School.Murray C, Lopez A (1996) The Global Burden of Disease: a comprehensive assessment ofmortality & disability from diseases, injuries & risk factors in 1990 & projected to 2020,Volume 1, Global Burden of Disease & Injury Series, Harvard: Harvard School of PublicHealth.Murray C, Lopez A, Mathers C, Stein C (2001) The Global Burden of Disease 2000 Project:aims, methods and data sources, Discussion Policy Paper No 36, WHO, November.National Evaluation of Sure Start Team (2005) Report 13, Early Impacts of Sure Start localprograms on children and families, London: HMSO.107
Page 1 and 2:
June 2009Positive Family Functionin
Page 3 and 4:
3.8 Reconnect......................
Page 5 and 6:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSAccess Economics wo
Page 7 and 8:
NESSNFFNPVPFFPIMTriple-PPUPRCTREACh
Page 9 and 10:
A simple definition of PFF could no
Page 11 and 12:
ehaviour during youth and later in
Page 13 and 14:
Alternatives to such a partnership
Page 15 and 16:
ooCommunities for childrenInvest an
Page 17 and 18:
1. MEANING AND MEASUREMENTWorking d
Page 19 and 20:
Fletcher (2007) presented the New Z
Page 21 and 22:
DomainEmotionalGovernanceEngagement
Page 23 and 24:
ModelTABLE 1-2: THEORETICAL MODELS
Page 25 and 26:
In times of crisis we can turn to e
Page 27 and 28:
2. MEASURING OUTCOMESImpacts from F
Page 29 and 30:
TABLE 2-1: MATERNAL AND PATERNAL IN
Page 31 and 32:
Parental limit setting, family conf
Page 33 and 34:
studied in the literature and separ
Page 35 and 36:
TABLE 2-7: FAMILY RISK FACTORS ASSO
Page 37 and 38:
FIGURE 2-4: PARENTAL INPUTS (AGE TH
Page 39 and 40:
exacerbated by the formation of aff
Page 41 and 42:
Productivity outcomes appear to be
Page 43 and 44:
Danish National Longitudinal Study
Page 45 and 46:
Key research question 14: how the i
Page 47 and 48:
ut could not (until further Waves o
Page 49 and 50:
FIGURE 2-6: LONGITUDINAL PATHWAYS T
Page 51 and 52:
only be useful in providing informa
Page 53 and 54:
FIGURE 2-9: CONCEPTUAL MAP FOR VALU
Page 55 and 56:
Productivity losses would best be m
Page 57 and 58:
Short term productivity costsThe fr
Page 59 and 60:
The expected retirement age by the
Page 61 and 62:
(discussed previously in Section 2.
Page 63 and 64:
Aids and home modificationsAlthough
Page 65 and 66:
The extensive literature in this fi
Page 67 and 68:
In discounting healthy life and oth
Page 69 and 70:
proximal risk factors are those tha
Page 71 and 72: ages of 18-24 months and between 4
Page 73 and 74: TABLE 3-4: MATERNITY IMMUNISATION A
Page 75 and 76: Family Relationship Centres are a f
Page 77 and 78: Increased contentment in children w
Page 79 and 80: TABLE 3-7: FAMILY DISPUTE RESOLUTIO
Page 81 and 82: 3.3.1 COMMUNITIES FOR CHILDRENProgr
Page 83 and 84: Quantitative and qualitative data w
Page 85 and 86: This initiative developed out of a
Page 87 and 88: FIGURE 3-2: DIAGRAM OF TRIPLE P SYS
Page 89 and 90: TABLE 3-11: RESULTS OF META-ANALYSE
Page 91 and 92: This section on early childhood int
Page 93 and 94: Table 3-14 displays a summary of th
Page 95 and 96: TABLE 3-15: BCR OF ECE PROGRAMSSour
Page 97 and 98: 3.6 PEEL CHILD HEALTH SURVEYThe Pee
Page 99 and 100: Research on efficacy - Evaluation o
Page 101 and 102: Education participation levels rema
Page 103 and 104: For FLW, outcomes assessment was re
Page 105 and 106: whether children, families and comm
Page 107 and 108: Mothers of 36 month olds were repor
Page 109 and 110: The effects associated with SSLPs a
Page 111 and 112: social context of the family.Self-r
Page 113 and 114: social and emotional development of
Page 115 and 116: analyses can be broken down further
Page 117 and 118: 4. CONCLUSIONThe method proposed fo
Page 119 and 120: Australian Institute of Family Stud
Page 121: Duncan J, Bowden C, Smith AB (2005)
Page 125 and 126: Sanders MR (2003) ‘Triple P - Pos
show all

pdf [5.3MB] - Department of Families, Housing, Community Services

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?