<strong>ACTA</strong> <strong>TECHNICA</strong> <strong>CORVINIENSIS</strong> – BULLETIN <strong>of</strong> ENGINEERINGand loads, preventing water leakage, improvingspecifications and improving design clarity,details, and layout. The Oxford Dictionary <strong>of</strong>Current English (1984) defines defects as ‘lack <strong>of</strong>something essential, imperfection, shortcoming,failing. A defect is defined in ISO 8402 as thenon-fulfillment <strong>of</strong> intended usage requirements.It means lacking and not meeting the requiredstandard. A defect is present when there is adifference the required standard and the actualdelivered standard. The concept <strong>of</strong> Zero defectsare performance to agreed specification (Eaton,1996; Al-Mahade et al., 2008). It literally means100% error free. Is it attainable, or is it goodenough to achieve a certain percentage <strong>of</strong>acceptable defects? The zero defects conceptbecame popular when Crosby a quality managerdeveloped a concept based on his beliefs thatproduct should be defect-free when delivered tothe customer (Harrington, 1998). This conceptwas neither a technique nor a methodology; itembodied an attitude that Crosby sought toinstill in every individual. It focused on anindividual’s commitment to always meet theengineering specification. Defects may appearas a building is constructed or after an element<strong>of</strong> work is completed. In most standard forms <strong>of</strong>buildings contractors, there are usuallyprovisions that require rectification <strong>of</strong> defects bythe contractor at his own costs. The defectsLiability Period (DLP) is a period <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong>months s stated in the contract, commencingfrom the day a project is certified practicallycompleted and handed over to the client (Sikan,2001). Defects in construction can result in verylarge costs. Even with minor defects; theoperations <strong>of</strong> a quality may be impaired,resulting in increased costs and delays.Generally construction industry players believethat to achieve zero defects in construction isnot possible. However it must be highlighted thatthe concept <strong>of</strong> zero defects in not only aboutachieving zero effects as an absolute goal, butalso generating a different attitude towardswork. It is about looking at projects from acustomer’s point <strong>of</strong> view and catering for theirneeds. It is about getting the work right the firsttime and delivering the project on time (Costain,1998). Application <strong>of</strong> the zero defects concept inconstruction is relatively new, especially inLibya. It is a subject <strong>of</strong> discussion in manyforums and researchers overseas and is beingimplemented to a certain extent in other parts <strong>of</strong>the world, especially in western countries andsome Asian countries like Malaysia andSingapore. However, defects occur eitherbecause <strong>of</strong> poor design or low qualityworkmanship or because the building was notconstructed according to the design or becauseit has been subjected to factors not followed forin the design. These causes may operate singlyor in combination and result in defects indicatedby changes in composition <strong>of</strong> materials in theconstruction itself; in the size, shape or weight <strong>of</strong>materials or parts <strong>of</strong> a building; or simply inappearance. One <strong>of</strong> the many approaches thathave been devised to reduce this problem <strong>of</strong>defects in newly completed buildings is theintroduction <strong>of</strong> the zero defects concept. Thisconcept, which is generally synonymous withthe manufacturing industry has become thesubject <strong>of</strong> discussions in many forums, and hasrecorded laudable results in selecteddemonstration projects overseas. Therefore, theobjective <strong>of</strong> this study is to identify the level <strong>of</strong>awareness <strong>of</strong> local industry players towards zerodefects in Libyan construction, to find out theperception <strong>of</strong> local industry players towards zerodefects. To study on the perception <strong>of</strong> localindustry players in achieving zero. This study isexploratory and analytical in nature. Thepurpose is purely to provide some conclusiveevidence on the construction defects in Libya.RESEARCH PROBLEMThere are huge amount <strong>of</strong> standards and codesavailable internationally. However, each isdesigned specifically to overcome regionalproblems. There are some common problemsfrom construction defects in homes andcondominiums. As home buyer, it is the bestinterest to at least be aware <strong>of</strong> the potentialconstruction defects that can occur in a home ora condominium (Steven, 2005). There are somecommon construction defect lists Al-Mahade etal., 2008. However, the following are descriptions<strong>of</strong> some common problems arising from someconstructions defects in homes andcondominiums in Libya (GPC, 2006; Al-Mahadeet al., 2008): (i) Construction defects could be theresult <strong>of</strong> improper design or installationdeficiencies; and (ii) Construction defects couldbe due to substandard construction strategies,faulty workmanship inside and outside house,1062010/Fascicule 2/AprilJune /Tome III
<strong>ACTA</strong> <strong>TECHNICA</strong> <strong>CORVINIENSIS</strong> – BULLETIN <strong>of</strong> ENGINEERINGbad building materials, poor drainage systems orimproper soil analysis and preparation.RESEARCH METHODOLOGYAll the date and information was collected frombasically two sources. The first data sources arefrom published book, articles and journals, andinternet websites. Secondly, primary date to beanalyzed was collected from field researches,which are through questionnaires. Thequestionnaires were administrated over a period<strong>of</strong> two (20 weeks and another two (2) weekswere used to collect and key in the data. Thisquestionnaire was distributed to 40 respondents,consisting <strong>of</strong> client’s developers, consultants andcontractors. The questionnaires were deliveredpersonally, sent out by fax and e-mailed to therespondents. From 40 questionnaires distributed,32 (80%) returned with completed answers. Datawas coded and transferred to the computer andanalyzed using the Statistical Package for SocialSciences (SPSS). The testing methods used wereDescriptive statistics.RESULTS ANALYSISFrom the responses gathered, it can be clearlyfigured out that the majority <strong>of</strong> respondentsagreed that the local construction industry isplagued with defective works, especially in lowcost and medium cost houses. Seventy ninepercent had answered 'yes' whist only theremaining 21% answered in the negative. Thiscorresponds with the increasing number <strong>of</strong>complaints received by the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Housingand Local Government for the past severalyears. When questioned about what are the mostcommon defects <strong>of</strong>ten encountered in newlycompleted building? It resealed from that themost defects are cracks (70.7%) followed bydefects related to structural defects (14.6%) whiledefects related to water intrusion/damp andother defects were least selected (Table 1).However, cracks in building may appear inmany forms. Most cracks such as hairline cracksare not dangerous the appearance <strong>of</strong> a building.However, there are wide gaping cracks whichare not only eyesores, but also pose a danger toinhabitants.Thirty one and seven percent from therespondents selected poor workmanship as themajor cause <strong>of</strong> defects (Table 2). All therespondents grouping also indicated a largemajority for poor workmanship.Table 1. Illustrate the most common defects incompleted building in LibyaType <strong>of</strong> defersPercentagesCracks29 (70.7%)Defect related to waterintrusion / damp4 (9.8%)Detachment2(4.9%)Structural defects6 (14.6%)Table 2. What are the common causes <strong>of</strong>tenencounteredType <strong>of</strong> causesPercentagesPoor workmanship13 (31.7%)Poor supervision19 (46.3%)Inappropriate design /selection <strong>of</strong> materials7 (17.1%)Substandard materials2 (4.9%)The responded were also asked about theirsatisfaction with the overall quality <strong>of</strong> completedbuildings by their organization. However, themajority (43.8%) stated they were sometimessatisfied while the remaining 34.4% were satisfiedyes (Table 3).Table 3. Overall quality <strong>of</strong> completed buildings by theorganizations in LibyaType <strong>of</strong> causesYesSometimesMost <strong>of</strong> the timeNeverPercentages and Frequencies11 (26.8%)18 (43.9%)11 (26.8%)1 (2.4%)When asked whether the implementation <strong>of</strong>quality programmes can help to reduce defectsin construction end products, 84.4% hadanswered 'yes', whilst only the remaining 15.6%answered in the negative. However, as results, itis clearly observed that a huge number <strong>of</strong> therespondents gave positive answers. Awarenessabout the zero defects concept in construction isnot relatively high because 44 % had answered'yes', whilst only the remaining 56% answerednegatively. When questioned ''are you aware <strong>of</strong>the zero defects house construction programmelaunched by the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Housing and LocalGovernment. The results <strong>of</strong> the survey showedthat the awareness <strong>of</strong> the clients. 54% hadanswered, ‘Yes’, whilst only the remaining 46 %answered in the negative. On the other hand,when we questioned '' Are you aware <strong>of</strong> theconstruction industry standard. Fifty six percent<strong>of</strong> the respondents were aware <strong>of</strong> these systemsfrom their responses to the above mentionedquestion. The respondents 80% surveyed2010/Fascicule 2/AprilJune /Tome III 107