11.07.2015 Views

ACTA TECHNICA CORVINIENSIS - Bulletin of Engineering

ACTA TECHNICA CORVINIENSIS - Bulletin of Engineering

ACTA TECHNICA CORVINIENSIS - Bulletin of Engineering

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>ACTA</strong> <strong>TECHNICA</strong> <strong>CORVINIENSIS</strong> – BULLETIN <strong>of</strong> ENGINEERINGbad building materials, poor drainage systems orimproper soil analysis and preparation.RESEARCH METHODOLOGYAll the date and information was collected frombasically two sources. The first data sources arefrom published book, articles and journals, andinternet websites. Secondly, primary date to beanalyzed was collected from field researches,which are through questionnaires. Thequestionnaires were administrated over a period<strong>of</strong> two (20 weeks and another two (2) weekswere used to collect and key in the data. Thisquestionnaire was distributed to 40 respondents,consisting <strong>of</strong> client’s developers, consultants andcontractors. The questionnaires were deliveredpersonally, sent out by fax and e-mailed to therespondents. From 40 questionnaires distributed,32 (80%) returned with completed answers. Datawas coded and transferred to the computer andanalyzed using the Statistical Package for SocialSciences (SPSS). The testing methods used wereDescriptive statistics.RESULTS ANALYSISFrom the responses gathered, it can be clearlyfigured out that the majority <strong>of</strong> respondentsagreed that the local construction industry isplagued with defective works, especially in lowcost and medium cost houses. Seventy ninepercent had answered 'yes' whist only theremaining 21% answered in the negative. Thiscorresponds with the increasing number <strong>of</strong>complaints received by the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Housingand Local Government for the past severalyears. When questioned about what are the mostcommon defects <strong>of</strong>ten encountered in newlycompleted building? It resealed from that themost defects are cracks (70.7%) followed bydefects related to structural defects (14.6%) whiledefects related to water intrusion/damp andother defects were least selected (Table 1).However, cracks in building may appear inmany forms. Most cracks such as hairline cracksare not dangerous the appearance <strong>of</strong> a building.However, there are wide gaping cracks whichare not only eyesores, but also pose a danger toinhabitants.Thirty one and seven percent from therespondents selected poor workmanship as themajor cause <strong>of</strong> defects (Table 2). All therespondents grouping also indicated a largemajority for poor workmanship.Table 1. Illustrate the most common defects incompleted building in LibyaType <strong>of</strong> defersPercentagesCracks29 (70.7%)Defect related to waterintrusion / damp4 (9.8%)Detachment2(4.9%)Structural defects6 (14.6%)Table 2. What are the common causes <strong>of</strong>tenencounteredType <strong>of</strong> causesPercentagesPoor workmanship13 (31.7%)Poor supervision19 (46.3%)Inappropriate design /selection <strong>of</strong> materials7 (17.1%)Substandard materials2 (4.9%)The responded were also asked about theirsatisfaction with the overall quality <strong>of</strong> completedbuildings by their organization. However, themajority (43.8%) stated they were sometimessatisfied while the remaining 34.4% were satisfiedyes (Table 3).Table 3. Overall quality <strong>of</strong> completed buildings by theorganizations in LibyaType <strong>of</strong> causesYesSometimesMost <strong>of</strong> the timeNeverPercentages and Frequencies11 (26.8%)18 (43.9%)11 (26.8%)1 (2.4%)When asked whether the implementation <strong>of</strong>quality programmes can help to reduce defectsin construction end products, 84.4% hadanswered 'yes', whilst only the remaining 15.6%answered in the negative. However, as results, itis clearly observed that a huge number <strong>of</strong> therespondents gave positive answers. Awarenessabout the zero defects concept in construction isnot relatively high because 44 % had answered'yes', whilst only the remaining 56% answerednegatively. When questioned ''are you aware <strong>of</strong>the zero defects house construction programmelaunched by the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Housing and LocalGovernment. The results <strong>of</strong> the survey showedthat the awareness <strong>of</strong> the clients. 54% hadanswered, ‘Yes’, whilst only the remaining 46 %answered in the negative. On the other hand,when we questioned '' Are you aware <strong>of</strong> theconstruction industry standard. Fifty six percent<strong>of</strong> the respondents were aware <strong>of</strong> these systemsfrom their responses to the above mentionedquestion. The respondents 80% surveyed2010/Fascicule 2/April­June /Tome III 107

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!