Technical Sessions – Monday July 11
Technical Sessions – Monday July 11
Technical Sessions – Monday July 11
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
FB-06 IFORS 20<strong>11</strong> - Melbourne<br />
2 - Perils of the Advantage Set<br />
Alan Brown, retired, 14 Rowell Street, Rosanna, 3084,<br />
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, abrown@labyrinth.net.au<br />
In tennis, the stopping rules for an advantage set are poorly designed, and the<br />
total number of games required to determine the winner is not well controlled.<br />
When the advantage set is played, the standard deviation of the number of<br />
games is a poor measure of risk of very long matches. Analysis of the distribution<br />
of the number of games in an advantage set provides a simple practical<br />
example where the Normal Power approximation fails. It is proposed that the<br />
advantage set be replaced by short tie-breaker sets in tournament matches.<br />
3 - Analyzing Tennis Scoring Systems: From the Origins<br />
to Today<br />
Tristan Barnett, School of Mathematics and Statistics, University<br />
of South Australia, 1/<strong>11</strong> Findon St, Hawthorn, 3122, Melbourne,<br />
Victoria, Australia, strategicgames@hotmail.com<br />
This paper investigates tennis scoring systems that have been used throughout<br />
history — from Royal Tennis in 1490 to the most recent change to doubles<br />
Lawn Tennis in 2006. By identifying how the game has changed (such as<br />
technology in equipment) this helps to establish "reasonable’ scoring systems<br />
that could be used for today. Based on this information and obtaining mathematical<br />
results of scoring systems, recommendations are given for men’s and<br />
women’s singles and doubles events. Actual matches are given to demonstrate<br />
why changes in many scoring systems are necessary.<br />
� FB-06<br />
Friday, 13:15-14:45<br />
Meeting Room 105<br />
Logistics<br />
Stream: Transportation<br />
Invited session<br />
Chair: Said Salhi, Kent Business School, University of Kent, Centre<br />
for Heuristic Optimisation„ Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7PE, United<br />
Kingdom, s.salhi@kent.ac.uk<br />
1 - Pricing for Production and Delivery Flexibility<br />
Martin Savelsbergh, CSIRO, NSW 1670, North Ryde, Australia,<br />
Martin.Savelsbergh@csiro.au, George Nemhauser, Yaxian Li<br />
Adjusting prices to influence demand to increase revenue has become common<br />
practice. We investigate adjusting prices to influence demand to reduce cost.<br />
We consider offering price discounts in return for delivery flexibility in a singleitem<br />
uncapacitated lot-sizing context. Even though the resulting optimization<br />
problem has a nonlinear objective function it can still be solved in polynomial<br />
time under Wagner-Whitin cost conditions. Furthermore, we report results of a<br />
computational study analyzing the benefits of offering price discounts in return<br />
for delivery flexibility in various settings.<br />
2 - Metaheuristics for Order Batching and Batch Sequencing<br />
in Manual Order Picking Systems<br />
Sebastian Henn, Faculty of Economics and Management,<br />
Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Universitätsplatz 2,<br />
39106, Magdeburg, Germany, sebastian.henn@ovgu.de<br />
Order picking deals with the retrieval of articles from their storage locations<br />
in order to satisfy customer requests. Major issues in manual picking systems<br />
are the transformation of customer orders into picking orders and the determination<br />
of picking tours. In practice, customer orders have to be completed by<br />
certain due dates. The observance of these dates is influenced by the composition<br />
of the batches, their tour lengths and by the sequence according to which<br />
the batches are processed. It is presented, how metaheuristics can be used to<br />
minimize the tardiness for given customer orders.<br />
� FB-07<br />
Friday, 13:15-14:45<br />
Meeting Room 106<br />
Healthcare Systems and Queues<br />
Stream: Applied Probability<br />
Invited session<br />
Chair: Ilze Ziedins, University of Auckland, 1010, Auckland, New<br />
Zealand, i.ziedins@auckland.ac.nz<br />
<strong>11</strong>8<br />
1 - Some Observations Concerning Priority Queues<br />
Mark Fackrell, Mathematics and Statistics, The University of<br />
Melbourne, 3010, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia,<br />
fackrell@unimelb.edu.au<br />
We consider a single server queue with two types of customers, each type arriving<br />
according to a Poisson process, with possibly different rates. One type of<br />
customer is labelled “high priority”, the other “low priority”. Once a customer<br />
arrives to the queue they begin accumulating priority at a fixed rate, depending<br />
on their priority class. We present some theoretical and simulation results for<br />
the nonpreemptive priority queue mentioned above, and extend the analysis to<br />
queues with more than two priority classes of customers.<br />
2 - A New Paradigm for Priority Patient Selection<br />
David Stanford, Dept. of Statistical & Actuarial Sciences, The<br />
University of Western Ontario, WSC 262, <strong>11</strong>51 Richmond Street<br />
N., N6A 5B7, London, Ontario, Canada, stanford@stats.uwo.ca,<br />
Peter Taylor, Ilze Ziedins<br />
In many health care systems: 1) Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) specify<br />
the fraction of patients needing to be seen by some key time point. 2) Patient<br />
classes present themselves for care in a fashion that is totally independent of<br />
the KPIs. There is no reason to expect the resulting system performance will<br />
adhere to the specified KPIs. The present work presents a new paradigm for<br />
priority assignment that enables one to fine-tune the system in order to achieve<br />
the delay targets, assuming sufficient capacity exists for at least one such arrangement.<br />
3 - Modelling Patient Flow through a Cardio-vascular Intensive<br />
Care Unit<br />
Ilze Ziedins, University of Auckland, 1010, Auckland, New<br />
Zealand, i.ziedins@auckland.ac.nz<br />
We describe a simulation model of an intensive care unit, and an associated optimization<br />
routine, that were developed for the Cardiovascular Intensive Care<br />
Unit at Auckland City Hospital. Acute patients arrive as a time varying Poisson<br />
process, while elective patients are modelled as deterministic arrivals. Lengths<br />
of stay are drawn from the empirical distributions for different types of patients.<br />
The model has been used to determine the number of beds that are needed in<br />
the unit, and to explore the benefits of flexible rostering.<br />
� FB-08<br />
Friday, 13:15-14:45<br />
Meeting Room 107<br />
Natural Resource Management<br />
Stream: Dynamic Programming<br />
Invited session<br />
Chair: Julia Piantadosi, School of Mathematics and Statistics,<br />
University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes Campus, Mawson<br />
Lakes Boulevard, Mawson Lakes, 5095, Adelaide, South Australia,<br />
julia.piantadosi@unisa.edu.au<br />
1 - Time Series Analysis of Daily Rainfall<br />
John Boland, School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of<br />
South Australia, Mawson Lakes Blvd., 5095, Mawson Lakes,<br />
South Australia, Australia, john.boland@unisa.edu.au<br />
How correlated is daily rainfall? It is common to model daily rainfall totals as a<br />
Markov Chain. However, we conjecture that dependence at longer time scales,<br />
typically of the order of one week, can be important. Standard procedures do<br />
not capture this longer range dependence. We show the use of multiple regression<br />
and principal component analysis in this problem.<br />
2 - Effective Decision Making Polices for Multi-reservoir<br />
Systems<br />
Sara Browning, Mathematics and Statistics, University of South<br />
Australia, Mawson Lakes Campus, Mawson Lakes, 5095,<br />
Adelaide, SA, Australia, sara.browning@mymail.unisa.edu.au<br />
We are interested in developing more effective decision making polices for<br />
multi-reservoir systems using a variety of mathematical processes such as<br />
stochastic dynamic programming (SDP) and decomposition. We have developed<br />
an SDP formulation for the major storage areas of the Murray-Darling<br />
basin using a decomposition procedure which compares favourably to SDP solutions<br />
of the whole system. By incorporating methods of risk management we<br />
aim to develop an efficient and comprehensible model to determine economic<br />
water management policies whilst avoiding environmental damage to the water<br />
system.