Technical Sessions – Monday July 11
Technical Sessions – Monday July 11
Technical Sessions – Monday July 11
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
4 - A Robust Planning Approach for Final Assembly in Special<br />
Purpose Machinery<br />
Christian Gahm, Chair Of Business Administration, Production<br />
& Supply Chain Management, Augsburg University,<br />
Universitätsstraße 16, 86159, Augsburg, Germany,<br />
christian.gahm@wiwi.uni-augsburg.de, Bastian Dünnwald<br />
Planning the final assembly of special purpose machinery is marked by high<br />
uncertainty. Against this background we developed an integrated optimizationsimulation<br />
planning approach calculating a robust production plan, which minimizes<br />
lead times (WIP) and assures deadlines. The approach comprises a planning<br />
method that considers uncertainty by correction factors and an algorithm<br />
to solve the hybrid-flow-shop problem with variable-intensity and preemptive<br />
tasks. The implemented DSS focuses usability as well as adaptability and its<br />
application in an aerospace company shows impressive results.<br />
� FB-13<br />
Friday, 13:15-14:45<br />
Meeting Room 206<br />
Mathematical Programming IV<br />
Stream: Continuous and Non-Smooth Optimization<br />
Invited session<br />
Chair: Xiaoqi Yang, Department of Applied Mathematics, The Hong<br />
Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong,<br />
mayangxq@polyu.edu.hk<br />
Chair: Regina Burachik, School of Mathematics and Statistics,<br />
University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes, 5095, Adelaide, South<br />
Australia, Australia, regina.burachik@unisa.edu.au<br />
1 - Continued Iterations on Interior Point Methods<br />
Aurelio Oliveira, Computational & Applied Mathematics, State<br />
University Of Campinas, DMA IMECC Unicamp, C. P. 6065,<br />
13081-970, Campinas, SP, Brazil, aurelio@ime.unicamp.br,<br />
Lilian Berti<br />
The search directions on interior point methods are projected along the blocking<br />
constraint in order to continue the iteration. The process can be repeated<br />
while the projected direction is a good one in some measure. Since the such direction<br />
is as easy to compute as the corrector one, the approach can contribute<br />
to speed up convergence by reducing the total number of iterations. Numerical<br />
experiments show that the approach is promising when applied at the last<br />
interior point methods iterations.<br />
2 - Implementation of a block-decomposition algorithm for<br />
solving large-scale conic semidefinite programming<br />
problems<br />
Camilo Ortiz, School of Industrial & Systems Engineering,<br />
Georgia Institute of Technology, 765 Ferst Drive, NW,<br />
30332-0205, Atlanta, Georgia, United States,<br />
camiort@gatech.edu, Renato D.C. Monteiro, Benar F. Svaiter<br />
We consider block-decomposition first-order methods for solving large-scale<br />
conic semidefinite programming problems. Several ingredients are introduced<br />
to speed-up the method in its pure form such as: an aggressive choice of stepsize<br />
for performing the extragradient step; and the use of scaled inner products<br />
in the primal and dual spaces. Finally, we present computational results showing<br />
that our method outperforms the two most competitive codes for large-scale<br />
semidefinite programs, namely: the boundary point method by Povh et al. and<br />
the Newton-CG augmented Lagrangian method by Zhao et al.<br />
3 - On a Polynomial Merit Function for Interior Point Methods<br />
Luiz Rafael Santos, Computational & Applied Mathematics,<br />
University of Campinas, Rua Sérgio Buarque de Holanda, 651,<br />
Cidade Universitária, 13083-859, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil,<br />
lrsantos@ime.unicamp.br, Fernado Villas-Bôas, Aurelio<br />
Oliveira, Clovis Perin<br />
Predictor-corrector type interior point methods are largely used to solve linear<br />
programs. In this context, we develop a polynomial merit function that<br />
arises from predicting the next residue of each iterate and that depends on three<br />
variables: a centralizer weight, a corrector weight, and a step size. We also generalize<br />
Gondzio’s symmetric neighborhood, and the merit function is subjected<br />
to this neighborhood. A constrained global optimization problem results from<br />
this method and its solution leads to a good direction. Numerical experiments<br />
and comparisons to PCx are performed.<br />
IFORS 20<strong>11</strong> - Melbourne FB-14<br />
4 - Semi-infinite Program with Infinitely Many Conic Constraints:<br />
Optimality Condition and Globally Convergent<br />
Algorithm<br />
Shunsuke Hayashi, Graduate School of Informatics, Kyoto<br />
University, Yoshida-Honmachi, Sakyo-Ku, 606-8501, Kyoto,<br />
Japan, shunhaya@amp.i.kyoto-u.ac.jp, Takayuki Okuno, Masao<br />
Fukushima<br />
We focus on the semi-infinite conic program (SICP), which is to minimize a<br />
convex function subject to infinitely many conic constraints. We show that,<br />
under Robinson’s constraint qualification, an optimum of the SICP satisfies the<br />
KKT conditions that can be represented only with a finite subset of the conic<br />
constraints. We also introduce an exchange type algorithm combined with a<br />
regularization technique, and show that it has global convergence. We also<br />
give some numerical results to see the efficiency of the proposed algorithm.<br />
� FB-14<br />
Friday, 13:15-14:45<br />
Meeting Room 207<br />
Optimization Modeling and Equilibrium<br />
Problems II<br />
Stream: Continuous and Non-Smooth Optimization<br />
Invited session<br />
Chair: Larry LeBlanc, Owen Graduate School of Management,<br />
Vanderbilt University, 401 21st Avenue South, 37203, Nashville, Tn,<br />
United States, larry.leblanc@owen.vanderbilt.edu<br />
Chair: Dominik Dorsch, Dept. Mathematics, RWTH Aachen<br />
University, Templergraben 55, 52056, Aachen, NRW, Germany,<br />
dorsch@mathc.rwth-aachen.de<br />
1 - Implementing Optimization Models: Organization Capability<br />
and Analytical Needs<br />
Larry LeBlanc, Owen Graduate School of Management,<br />
Vanderbilt University, 401 21st Avenue South, 37203, Nashville,<br />
Tn, United States, larry.leblanc@owen.vanderbilt.edu, Thomas<br />
Grossman<br />
We explain why recent technological advances have increased the value optimization<br />
for analytics and present approaches for bringing optimization to<br />
bear. These are applying optimization to a traditional manually-constructed<br />
spreadsheet, using Excel’s built-in VBA prior to applying optimization, and a<br />
mathematical approach using Excel for input/output to special-purpose algebraic<br />
modeling language. We explain the relative strengths and weaknesses<br />
of each approach and guide analysts in selecting the approach that takes into<br />
consideration both organizational capability and analytical needs.<br />
2 - Integrated Framework for Fuel Reduction and Fire Suppression<br />
Resource Allocation<br />
James Minas, Mathematical and Geospatial Sciences<br />
Department, RMIT University, GPO Box 2476V, 3001,<br />
Melbourne, VIC, Australia, james.minas@rmit.edu.au, John<br />
Hearne<br />
Wildfire-related destruction is a global problem that appears to be worsening.<br />
Wildfire management involves a complex mix of interrelated components including<br />
fuel management, fire weather forecasting, fire behaviour modelling,<br />
values-at-risk determination and fire suppression. We propose a mathematical<br />
programming model that provides an integrated risk-based framework for fuel<br />
management and fire suppression resource allocation.<br />
3 - An Intelligent Model Using Excel Spread Sheet in a<br />
Manufacturing System<br />
Kanthen K Harikrishnan, School of Applied Mathematics<br />
Faculty of Enggineering, Nottingham University Malaysia<br />
Campus, Jalan Broga„ 43500, Semenyih, Selangor, Malaysia,<br />
Harikrishnan.KK@nottingham.edu.my, Ho Kok Hoe, Kanesan<br />
Muthusamy<br />
The research integrates the combination of mathematical modelling and intelligent<br />
modelling concept to represent a manufacturing system in the Excel spread<br />
sheet interface. The mathematical modelling uses two types of approaches,<br />
which use IE variables and the development of mathematical theorem using<br />
deduction methodology from the dynamic manufacturing system. Mathematical<br />
language and mathematical reasoning technique through programming in<br />
spread sheet are used to build an intelligent modelling system which optimises<br />
targeted inventory level in order to response without human involvement.<br />
121