TORTURE AND ILL-TREATMENT OF CHILDREN IN UKRAINE

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Torture and ill-treatment of children in Ukraine3.4 Meetings with the lawyer. Did the lawyer concern herself/himself withthe case, did s/he sort it out, or did s/he work for effect only? Did the lawyerask you about the forced confession?3.5 Was there medical examination after your arrest? When was it? Whatquestions did the doctors ask and what did they find out?16⇒ Treatment of minorsDuration: 20–30 minutes4.1 First contact with the militia: what were you detained for, how did it go,who else was with you. Did militia apply violence or threats? How long did thetying-up take? Tell about the space for detainees.4.2 Do you think militia violated your rights? If they did, what was exactlywrong?4.3 If there was abuse or other violations, did you tell someone of them?If you told someone, what were the consequences of this complaint?4.4. Did you know, where exactly you should complain of abuse?(Questions 4.5–4.7 are in option for those who wren in investigative isolationwards, for respondents who were in other institutions; we query aboutthis institution)4.5 How long have you been in investigative isolation ward? What canyou say about the prison personnel? How many people were in the cell, wereyou on good terms with your cellmates? Were you at outs with anybody? Wasthere a troublemaker in the cell? Was this person punished?4.6 Were you or other people known to you victims of violence in the investigativeisolation ward? Or other things that were difficult to endure? Forexample, was it very cold or very hot in the cell?4.7 If we compare an investigative isolation ward with a colony, what is themain difference? Where do you feel better and why?4.8 Your relations with the colony personnel: they are rather good, somewhatbad, or rather indifferent, purely formal?4.9 Do you have friends in the colony? Is there someone having a lot ofaggression towards you? Do you have people in your party, which are treatedbadly by everyone? Why?4.10 If you were the boss, what the priority changes in the colony wouldbe? And is there anything acceptable which needs no changes?
Methodological framework of the studySemi-structured interview.Instruction of the interviewer and scenario.For sampling of those released from penal institutions (instrument C2)• Sampling of respondentsThe total size of sampling makes 20 individuals, who meet the minimumrequirements for sampling in terms of statistics. The sample is formed in sucha way that it may represent several groups of people set at liberty.The peculiar feature of instrument C2 compared to C1 can be in the factof more refusals to be interviewed, as well as slightly higher representation inthe sample of set at liberty, who were sentenced to short terms of imprisonment.However, with this instrument we also form a quota by articles of theCriminal Code and by serving time in the institutions which carry out criminalor administrative sentences (note: not term of imprisonment in accordancewith the court’s judgment!). Time spent in an investigative isolation ward and/or other institutions is added to the time in the colony.Sampling cannot be done among close acquaintances, friends or anyother group, whose members regularly communicate with each other at closedistance. [It was expected that the sample of 20 persons will be formed withthe assistance of the Ministry of Social Policy. However, due to lack of intereston the side of officials of the ministry the working group resorted to informalcontacts while carrying out sampling.]The sample includes only those persons, who voluntarily agree to be interviewedunder conditions of confidentiality and non-disclosure of their personaldata; see details in section 1 of the scenario. The table is filled by a personresponsible for sampling (supervisor).Crimes against life and healthCrimes against sexual freedomCrimes against propertyDrug abuseOther crimesTime spent in an investigative isolation ward and/or other penal institutions< 6 mos 6-18 mos >18 mos17
Page 2: DesignerBoris ZakharovOn the cover
Page 5 and 6: Section 5. ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTIV
Page 7 and 8: ForewordThe investigation comprised
Page 9 and 10: Methodological framework of the stu
Page 15: ⇒ 1. Information about the projec
Page 33 and 34: Section 1Analysis of legislation on
Page 45: Section 1Analysis of legislation on
Page 48 and 49: Torture and ill-treatment of childr
Page 66 and 67:
Torture and ill-treatment of childr
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196:
Науково-практичне
show all

TORTURE AND ILL-TREATMENT OF CHILDREN IN UKRAINE

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?