psychological state of the individual at the time ofthe message (e.g., his/her sense of responsibility forthe behaviors related to the arguments); the characteristicsof the message (e.g., its relevance to theindividual, the newness of the arguments and theability of the individual to process the message); andthe environment (e.g., the extent to which it encourageslearning).Peripheral route. Although thoughtful considerationof the arguments in a message often producesthe greatest amount of attitude change, attitudes canbe changed or reinforced in a variety of ways withoutsuch thoughtful consideration. For example, theadvertising and marketing of innumerable productsoften do not try to get people to think carefullyabout the advertised product. Instead, these adssimply try to get people to associate unconsciouslythe products with various desirable qualities (e.g.,being sexy, attractive, fun or powerful). In addition,persuasion methods employing classical conditioningget people to associate certain products orevents with desirable feelings without ever gettingthe people involved to think about the products orevents. For example, if people commonly engage insome behavior (meeting with colleagues) while theyare doing something else that they like (e.g., eatingfood they like), then they will tend to have positiveattitudes toward the first behavior. This is why manybusiness deals are conducted over lunch or dinner.Other methods of persuasion lie somewherebetween the two ends of the “central-peripheral”continuum. For example, statements from “experts”or “role models” may produce acceptance of someidea, product or behavior and require some awarenessof the message, but not require critical thinkingabout the message. If a sports hero or popularperson in a school encourages a particular behavior,that encouragement may effectively change attitudesand behavior, even if the endorsement is processedthrough a more peripheral route without carefulexamination.Sometimes endorsements from celebrity figures maybe effective, even if the arguments are weak, if thearguments are processed through a more peripheralroute and if they are not well examined. However,celebrity endorsements may not be effective if thearguments are weak and they are examined criticallythrough the central route and are rejected.Although celebrities may get youths’ attention, theirlifestyles are usually so removed from those of mostteens’ realities that their endorsements of ideas mayhave less lasting impact on attitudes than endorsementsfrom people with whom youth can identifymore closely, such as peers, parents or role models intheir own communities.Interventions sometimes give multiple reasons toengage or not engage in a behavior. When multiplereasons are given, people are sometimes persuadedsimply by the number of arguments rather than thestrength of each argument.Strength of arguments. When arguments areprocessed through the central route, the stronger orhigher quality the message, the greater the impact itwill have on the related attitude. According to Pettyand Wegner (1998), five characteristics determinethe quality and impact of arguments:1) Likelihood and desirability of outcome: If anargument for a behavior makes a case that a particularoutcome is likely and desirable, then it willbe stronger than if the outcome is not as likely ordesirable.2) Causality: If an argument for a behavior demonstratesa causal impact on some outcome, then theoutcome is considered more likely.3) Familiarity: If an argument is consistent withthe way people view the world, it will be moreconvincing.4) Importance: If an argument demonstrates thata behavior will have relevant and importantoutcomes, it will be scrutinized more carefullyand may have a greater impact on attitudes andbehavior.5) Newness: If an argument is new and different,it will have a greater impact on changing anattitude than an argument that has already beenheard multiple times and incorporated into anexisting attitude.58 <strong>Reducing</strong> <strong>Adolescent</strong> <strong>Sexual</strong> <strong>Risk</strong>: A <strong>Theoretical</strong> Guide for Developing and Adapting Curriculum-Based Programs
Although both quality and quantity of argumentsare important, it is quality, more than quantity, thatmatters. Up to a point, additional strong argumentsmake a stronger case. However, when too manyarguments are presented, people may begin to countthe arguments and use a more peripheral route thanif they carefully analyze each argument and use amore central route (Petty and Wegener 1998). Inthis situation, additional arguments may diminishthe amount of attitudinal change.To increase the strength of messages about behaviorand arguments to support them, both argumentsand messages should be pilot tested with theintended audiences. Sometimes, slightly changingthem (without diminishing their correctness) orchanging how they are presented can improve theextent to which they are thoughtfully considered.Tailoring. Tailoring refers to adjusting messages tomatch the particular characteristics of the audience(e.g., their age, gender, race/ethnicity or culture),their needs or their concerns. Tailoring can increaseboth the ability and the motivation to thoughtfullyconsider a message (Petty, Barden et al. 2002). Itcan increase acceptance of a message. For example,behavioral messages for younger youth who areless likely to be sexually active might focus moreon abstaining or delaying sex than on condom/contraceptive use, while those for older youth whoare more likely to be sexually active might givegreater emphasis to the use of protection. Programsfor older males might focus more on proper use ofcondoms while programs for older females mightfocus more on skills to get their partners to usecondoms. Programs for Hispanic youth might givemore weight to family values and connection to theirfamilies, while those for other racial/ethnic groupsmight emphasize other values. As another example,if communication messages include pictures, thepictures may need to be adjusted to reflect the characteristicsof the targeted groups.Tailoring also can focus more precisely on thoseattitudes that need to be changed. For example,some people may have negative attitudes aboutcondoms because of the discomfort of buying them;others may have negative attitudes because of theawkwardness of asking a partner to use them; andothers may have negative attitudes because of thereduction in sensation. To meet the concerns of eachgroup, messages designed to change attitudes aboutcondoms may need to be adjusted to meet each ofthose concerns.As a final example, stages of change theory stipulatesthat people often pass through five stages ontheir way to adopting and maintaining a healthbehavior (i.e., precontemplation, contemplation,preparation, action and maintenance) (Prochaska,DiClemente et al. 1992). Messages may need tobe tailored for each of these stages. For example, ifpeople are at the precontemplation stage, then messagesshould be designed to get them to think aboutchanging their behavior, whereas if they are in themaintenance stage, then messages should strive toget them to maintain their new positive behavior.Important characteristics of the source. Theamount of attention that people give to a messageoften depends on various characteristics of thesource of the message. For example, people oftengive more attention to message arguments whenthey come from a credible, trusted and respectedsource. They also will give more attention when thesources are familiar and similar to themselves. Itis important to note that the expertise of a sourcehas an impact on attitude change only if the recipientknows before the message is received that thespeaker is an expert. If the recipients learn thisafterward, the expertise of the source has less impacton attitude change.In addition to the characteristics of the source, thecharacteristics of the relationship with the sourcealso are important in achieving attitudinal or valuechange. For example, when people are closely connectedto the source (e.g., to parents, educators orfriends), they may be more willing to consider themessage arguments.Stages of attitude change. Just as Prochaska’stranstheoretical stages of change describes stagesin adopting or changing health behaviors, similartheories exist for attitude change. Depending on theChapter 5 Addressing Attitudes, Values and Beliefs 59
- Page 1:
Reducing AdolescentSexual RiskA The
- Page 4 and 5:
ETR Associates (Education, Training
- Page 6 and 7:
AcknowledgmentsThis book evolved ou
- Page 8 and 9:
Activities, Boxes and FiguresActivi
- Page 11 and 12:
1 IntroductionThis book was created
- Page 13 and 14:
• Children of teenage mothers are
- Page 15 and 16:
Table1-2 The 17 Characteristics of
- Page 17: Each of the following chapters focu
- Page 20 and 21: “determinants,” “behaviors,
- Page 22 and 23: model, provide evidence regarding h
- Page 24 and 25: to avoid unwanted sex and then synt
- Page 26 and 27: Figure2-3 An Example of a Logic Mod
- Page 28 and 29: Figure2-3 An Example of a Logic Mod
- Page 30 and 31: Figure2-3 An Example of a Logic Mod
- Page 32 and 33: Table2-2Learning Objectives to Redu
- Page 34 and 35: Table2-2Learning Objectives to Redu
- Page 36 and 37: Table2-3Learning Objectives to Incr
- Page 38 and 39: Table2-4Learning Objectives to Incr
- Page 40 and 41: Table2-6Learning Objectives to Incr
- Page 43 and 44: 3 Increasing KnowledgeKeys to Incre
- Page 45 and 46: Table3-1Number of Studies Reporting
- Page 47 and 48: Box3-1Types of Activities to Increa
- Page 49 and 50: partner does not mind using a condo
- Page 51 and 52: methods more often. For example, th
- Page 53 and 54: 4ImprovingPerceptions of Risks—Bo
- Page 55 and 56: 1. Do teens’ perceptions of risk
- Page 57 and 58: a. Presentations and discussions of
- Page 59 and 60: Table4-5Examples of Items That Have
- Page 61 and 62: Pregnancy Risk Activity and Follow-
- Page 63 and 64: STD Handshake(Continued)Important C
- Page 65 and 66: 5AddressingAttitudes,Values and Bel
- Page 67: Theories ofAttitude ChangeAttitudes
- Page 71 and 72: • When arguments are presented by
- Page 73 and 74: that it is possible to improve thes
- Page 75 and 76: c. Use simulations to demonstrate p
- Page 77 and 78: Table5-4Examples of Survey Items fr
- Page 79 and 80: Table5-4Examples of Survey Items fr
- Page 81 and 82: Activity 5-2Dreams, Goals and Value
- Page 83 and 84: Activity 5-4“Dear Abby”Descript
- Page 85 and 86: 6CorrectingPerceptionsof Peer Norms
- Page 87 and 88: Is there a gap between perceptions
- Page 89 and 90: 3. Use concepts, language, symbols,
- Page 91 and 92: Table6-4Examples of Items That Have
- Page 93 and 94: 7 Increasing Self-Efficacy and Skil
- Page 95 and 96: feelings may reduce their self-effi
- Page 97 and 98: situations more difficult so that t
- Page 99 and 100: paper (e.g., the air should be sque
- Page 101 and 102: Activity 7-1Lines That People Use t
- Page 103 and 104: Situations That May Lead to Unwante
- Page 105 and 106: Roleplaying to Enhance Refusal Skil
- Page 107: Activity 7-5Using Condoms Correctly
- Page 110 and 111: chaperoned, they may not have the o
- Page 112 and 113: attitudes about condoms and contrac
- Page 114 and 115: Activity 8-1Description of Activity
- Page 117 and 118: 9IncreasingParent-ChildCommunicatio
- Page 119 and 120:
ehavior may be quite complex (Jacca
- Page 121 and 122:
5. Give students multiple homework
- Page 123 and 124:
and the activities suggested prior
- Page 125 and 126:
Activity 9-1Description of Activity
- Page 127 and 128:
Activity 9-3Human Sexuality Board G
- Page 129 and 130:
10 ConclusionsKeys to Reducing Sexu
- Page 131 and 132:
Figure10-1Assessing Factors in Curr
- Page 133 and 134:
sexual minority youth and pressure
- Page 135 and 136:
Table10-1Instructional Principles I
- Page 137:
Table10-1Instructional Principles I
- Page 140 and 141:
Incidence The number of new cases o
- Page 143 and 144:
ResourcesThree kinds of resources a
- Page 145 and 146:
Science-Based Practices: A Guide fo
- Page 147 and 148:
National Longitudinal Study of Adol
- Page 149 and 150:
Changing Social Normshttp://www.etr
- Page 151 and 152:
Advocates for Youth, Young Women of
- Page 153 and 154:
ReferencesAbelson, R., and Prentice
- Page 155 and 156:
Coyle, K. (2006). All4You2! Prevent
- Page 157 and 158:
Lapsey, D.K. (1993). Toward an inte
- Page 159 and 160:
Weed, S.E., Olsen, J.A., DeGaston,