12.07.2015 Views

In situ and Ex situ Conservation of Commercial Tropical Trees - ITTO

In situ and Ex situ Conservation of Commercial Tropical Trees - ITTO

In situ and Ex situ Conservation of Commercial Tropical Trees - ITTO

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

497Similar to the pattern found for presence <strong>of</strong> fruiting bodies, ectomycorrhizalinfection occurred on the unburnt control <strong>and</strong> LB sites. The intensity <strong>of</strong> infection,however, was low (Table 1). <strong>In</strong> this study, root samples collected using a soilcorer were used. Roots <strong>of</strong> dipterocarps were not separated from roots <strong>of</strong> otherplants. The roots from several subplots were not dipterocarp roots <strong>and</strong> theseroots did not bear ectomycorrhiza. Since all root samples were considered, theaverage intensity <strong>of</strong> infection appears low. When roots from the soil corecontaining ectomycorrhiza only were considered, intensities <strong>of</strong> infection as greatas 76% could be obtained.Table 1. Mycorrhizal associations in an over-burned tropical rainforest inEast KalimantanEctomycorrhizal Spore Number <strong>of</strong> EndomycorrhizalPlot infection Endomycorrhizal Fungi <strong>In</strong>fection(%) 53 µm 75 µm 125 µm Total (%)Control 15.5 4 12 3 19 34.6LB 17.8 3.8 11.3 7.1 22.2 16.7SB 0 4.5 13.8 11 29.3 13.3Table 2. Distribution <strong>of</strong> ectomycorrhiza within each subplot in unburnt control<strong>and</strong> lightly burnt control sitePlot Sub No <strong>of</strong> soil core with ectomycorrhiza Range <strong>of</strong> EctomycorrhizalPlot (from 3 soil cores assessed) <strong>In</strong>fection (%)Control B2 1 13B9 3 17 – 41F5 0 0H2 0 0H9 2 54 – 76LB B2. 0 0B5 3 36 – 62D3 1 37F2 0 0F5 3 24 – 64Two types <strong>of</strong> ectomycorrhizal roots: (a) irregularly pinnate with abundantformation <strong>of</strong> extramatrical hyphae, <strong>and</strong> (b) monopodial pinnate withoutsignificant amount <strong>of</strong> extramatrical hyphae were obtained (Figure 2).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!