12.07.2015 Views

The Executive Compensation Controversy - Fondazione Rodolfo ...

The Executive Compensation Controversy - Fondazione Rodolfo ...

The Executive Compensation Controversy - Fondazione Rodolfo ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION CONTROVERSY: 24 MAY 2010A TRANSATLANTIC ANALYSISFigure 3.12008 CEO Pay in the USA and 10 European Countries after controlling for Sales and IndustryNote: <strong>The</strong> figure compares 2008 CEO pay (in €mil) in each country controlling for firm size (sales) and industry. We regressthe logarithm of total compensation on the logarithm of sales and 5 industry and 11 country dummies. For eachcountry, we estimate the pay for a CEO running a hypothetical firm with $1 billion sales using the estimatedcoefficient for pay-size sensitivity and that country’s dummy variable for a CEO in the largest industry group(manufacturing, energy, and utilities). Countries are sorted in descending order in terms of total estimated pay.Table 3.8 explores time-trends in the USA Pay Premium from 2003 to 2008, based onregressions of Ln(CEO Pay) on prior-year Ln(Sales) and five industry dummies (the omittedcategory is manufacturing, energy, and utilities). <strong>The</strong> coefficient on the USA dummy of.7846 in 2003 indicates that, after controlling for company size and industry, USA CEOsearned about 119% more than their European counterparts in 2003. 91 <strong>The</strong> implied USA PayPremium grew to 134% by 2005, fell to 75% in 2007, and grew to 102% in 2008 (whenexpected pay for manufacturing CEOs increased a bit in the USA, while falling in Europe).91 Since the dependent variable is in logarithms, the USA Pay Premium is calculated as e .7846 - 1 = 1.192.-76-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!