1 Studies in the History of Statistics and Probability ... - Sheynin, Oscar
1 Studies in the History of Statistics and Probability ... - Sheynin, Oscar
1 Studies in the History of Statistics and Probability ... - Sheynin, Oscar
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
What objections can be made? First, s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> problem concerns an<strong>in</strong>terval <strong>of</strong> a few centuries <strong>of</strong> time, it will be advisable to turn tohistory <strong>and</strong> look whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>re are examples <strong>of</strong> what is happen<strong>in</strong>g withsome fields <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>tellectual activity <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> which is preserved aslong as that. An example <strong>of</strong> such an activity is <strong>the</strong> scholasticism <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>Middle Ages.Scholastics were clever <strong>and</strong> diligent. In any case, <strong>the</strong> volume <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong>ir contributions was <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same order as, say, those <strong>of</strong> Laplace (<strong>the</strong>amount <strong>of</strong> paper that a man can cover with writ<strong>in</strong>g dur<strong>in</strong>g his lifetimelikely little depends on <strong>the</strong> contents <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> written). Universities <strong>and</strong>academies had been <strong>in</strong>itially created for scholastics because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>importance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> moral <strong>and</strong> ethical applications <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir work, actualor imag<strong>in</strong>ed. No one had expelled <strong>the</strong>m from those <strong>in</strong>stitutions with ared-hot broom 25 , but it somehow happened all by itself that scientists,physicists, ma<strong>the</strong>maticians, chemists etc., had occupied <strong>the</strong>ir places.Why did that occur?I believe that <strong>the</strong> reason was that scholasticism had graduallywithdrawn <strong>in</strong>to its own bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>and</strong> quit to provide society solutions<strong>of</strong> moral problems essential for everyday life. For example, now, as <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> Middle Ages, each solves for himself whe<strong>the</strong>r to marry or not.Scholastics naturally discussed that problem but <strong>the</strong>ir answers becamelong summaries <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> diverse op<strong>in</strong>ions <strong>of</strong> fa<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> church <strong>and</strong>ancient philosophers 26 . What <strong>the</strong>n should have done a practicallywork<strong>in</strong>g clergyman when asked by his parishioner?Such questions gradually occurred unbecom<strong>in</strong>g to serious science<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>n it somehow happened all by itself that <strong>the</strong> society had begunto consider unbecom<strong>in</strong>g scholasticism as a whole. This examplecompels us to th<strong>in</strong>k carefully what would have happened toma<strong>the</strong>matics had it been for centuries cut <strong>of</strong>f from all <strong>the</strong> streams <strong>of</strong>activities. The action <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ensu<strong>in</strong>g phenomenon would have beenvery simple: <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> young men wish<strong>in</strong>g to devote <strong>the</strong>mselvesto ma<strong>the</strong>matics would have gradually decreased s<strong>in</strong>ce those o<strong>the</strong>rstreams <strong>in</strong>deed play <strong>the</strong> most important part <strong>in</strong> attract<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>terest.However, f<strong>in</strong>ally it is possible to admit, <strong>and</strong> Dieudonne’s articleconv<strong>in</strong>ces us, that <strong>the</strong>re exists ma<strong>the</strong>matics <strong>of</strong> different types; one isdirected towards its own <strong>in</strong>terests, <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r one, towards applications.Both have a quite lawful right to exist because, for example, <strong>the</strong>Kolmogorov axiomatics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> probability, necessary <strong>in</strong> asense for applications as well, had emerged on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory<strong>of</strong> functions <strong>of</strong> a real variable (obviously belong<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> first type).But <strong>the</strong>n, to which type does <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> probability belong?The dist<strong>in</strong>guish<strong>in</strong>g feature <strong>of</strong> ma<strong>the</strong>matics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> first type is itssomewhat special elegance (present<strong>in</strong>g a comparative simplicity whichmakes it possible to perceive that quality). The <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> probabilityhas ra<strong>the</strong>r many results <strong>of</strong> exactly that k<strong>in</strong>d, mostly connected with <strong>the</strong>Kolmogorov axiomatics <strong>and</strong> resembl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> functions <strong>of</strong> areal variable. However, <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> contents <strong>of</strong> that science hav<strong>in</strong>g beenformed at <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> Laplace 27 , develop<strong>in</strong>g after him <strong>and</strong> be<strong>in</strong>gelaborated nowadays is not, alas! beautiful at all. For example, limit<strong>the</strong>orems are usually ra<strong>the</strong>r decently formulated, but as a rule <strong>the</strong>irpro<strong>of</strong>s are helplessly long, difficult <strong>and</strong> entangled. Their sole raison117