conclusions are derived <strong>in</strong> a purely ma<strong>the</strong>matical way <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>reforecerta<strong>in</strong>. However, on <strong>the</strong> whole everyth<strong>in</strong>g depends on <strong>the</strong> model.Statistical methods are as certa<strong>in</strong> (not more or less) as <strong>the</strong> conclusions<strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r sciences apply<strong>in</strong>g ma<strong>the</strong>matical means, for example physics,astronomy or strength <strong>of</strong> material. In practical problems <strong>the</strong>se sciencescan provide guid<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es but can not guarantee that we have correctlyapplied <strong>the</strong>m.1.3. Model <strong>of</strong> trend with an error. In a ma<strong>the</strong>matical model <strong>of</strong> anobservational series someth<strong>in</strong>g is always determ<strong>in</strong>ate <strong>and</strong> someth<strong>in</strong>gr<strong>and</strong>om. We will consider a model <strong>in</strong> which that seriesx 1 , x 2 , ..., x nis given by formulax i = f(t i ) + δ i . (1.7)Here t i is <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> some determ<strong>in</strong>ate variable specify<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> i-<strong>the</strong>xperiment, f(t), some determ<strong>in</strong>ate function (<strong>the</strong> trend) <strong>and</strong> δ i , ar<strong>and</strong>om variable usually called <strong>the</strong> error <strong>of</strong> that experiment. Thissituation means that <strong>the</strong> Lord determ<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong> true dependence by f(t)so that we should have observed f(t i ) <strong>in</strong> experiment i, but that <strong>the</strong> devil<strong>in</strong>serted <strong>the</strong> error δ i .For example, f(t) can represent one or ano<strong>the</strong>r coord<strong>in</strong>ate <strong>of</strong> anobject <strong>in</strong> space as dependent on time, <strong>and</strong> x i is our measurement <strong>of</strong> thatcoord<strong>in</strong>ate at moment t i . The devil’s <strong>in</strong>terference δ i can certa<strong>in</strong>ly bedeterm<strong>in</strong>ate, r<strong>and</strong>om or generally <strong>of</strong> an <strong>in</strong>determ<strong>in</strong>ate nature. Thus, <strong>the</strong>observed x i can be corrupted by a systematic error so that Eδ i is notnecessarily zero. We may assume that Eδ i = C <strong>and</strong> does not depend oni but it is also possible to consider Eδ i = φ(t i ) is a function <strong>of</strong> t i . Stillworse will happen if Eδ i depends on a variable u i which we can notcheck. In nei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong> those cases statistical treatment can elim<strong>in</strong>ate <strong>the</strong>errors.However, a sufficiently thorough plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> observations canallow us to hope that <strong>the</strong> errors will be purely r<strong>and</strong>om <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sense thatstatistical homogeneity is ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>re is no systematic shift:Eδ i = 0. More precisely, <strong>the</strong> systematic error will be sufficiently small<strong>and</strong> can be neglected. Such situations <strong>in</strong>deed comprise <strong>the</strong> scope <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>statistical methods.After recall<strong>in</strong>g what was said <strong>in</strong> § 1.2 it becomes clear that mostsimple statistical assumptions should be imposed on <strong>the</strong> errors δ i . Most<strong>of</strong>ten <strong>the</strong>se errors are supposed to be <strong>in</strong>dependent <strong>and</strong> identicallydistributed. Normality is also usually assumed. Only one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>irdeviations from <strong>the</strong> model <strong>of</strong> sample was brought <strong>in</strong>to use: it issometimes thought that <strong>the</strong>ir variances are not equal to one ano<strong>the</strong>r butproportional to numbers assigned accord<strong>in</strong>g to some considerations.Or, it is assumed that such numbers w i called weights <strong>of</strong> observationsare known thatw 1 var δ 1 = w 2 var δ 2 = ... = w n var δ n = σ 252
<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> variances are <strong>in</strong>versely proportional to <strong>the</strong> weights2σvar δ = .iw iI have described <strong>the</strong> assumptions imposed on <strong>the</strong> r<strong>and</strong>omcomponent <strong>of</strong> our observations. Now I pass to <strong>the</strong>ir determ<strong>in</strong>atecomponent f(t) o<strong>the</strong>rwise called trend.The most simple <strong>and</strong> classical case consists <strong>in</strong> that <strong>the</strong> function f(t)is <strong>of</strong> a quite def<strong>in</strong>ite class but depends on some unknown parametersc 1 , c 2 , ..., c k :f(t) = F(t, c 1 , c 2 , ..., c k ) (1.8)where <strong>the</strong> function F is given by a known formula or an algorithm <strong>of</strong>calculation. For example, <strong>in</strong> case <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> motion <strong>of</strong> an object <strong>in</strong> spacethose parameters can be understood as its coord<strong>in</strong>ates <strong>and</strong> velocities atany def<strong>in</strong>ite moment; o<strong>the</strong>r, more opportune parameters can also be<strong>in</strong>troduced.Then any coord<strong>in</strong>ate f(t) will be uniquely determ<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>the</strong>parameters <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Newtonian laws <strong>of</strong> motion (if that object has noeng<strong>in</strong>e). The problem consists <strong>in</strong> determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g estimates <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>parameters c ˆigiven observations (1.7). It is solved by <strong>the</strong> Gaussianmethod <strong>of</strong> least squares: <strong>the</strong> estimates are determ<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> such a waythat <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong>imal value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> functionn∑i=1[ x − F( t ; c ,..., c ]i i 1 k2<strong>of</strong> c i will be atta<strong>in</strong>ed at po<strong>in</strong>t ( cˆ1,..., c ˆk).More <strong>of</strong>ten, however, is <strong>the</strong> case <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong> real dependence f(t) isunknown. Here also <strong>the</strong> equality (1.8) is applied but <strong>the</strong> function F ischosen more or less arbitrarily. Thus, a polynomial might be chosen<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> method <strong>of</strong> least squares once more applied.Such a non-classical situation when f(t) is not known beforeh<strong>and</strong>dem<strong>and</strong>s a more detailed analysis, see a concrete example <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> nextChapter. Here, however, we describe an absolutely different modelalso applied for statistically treat<strong>in</strong>g observational series.1.4. Model <strong>of</strong> a stochastic process. The ma<strong>in</strong> attention is turned to<strong>the</strong> isolation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>ate component, <strong>the</strong> trend f(t). The values<strong>the</strong>mselves, x i , <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> observational series (1.8) are not r<strong>and</strong>om;r<strong>and</strong>om are only <strong>the</strong> additional magnitudes δ i considered as errors,noise, <strong>and</strong> generally <strong>the</strong> devil’s mach<strong>in</strong>ations. Ano<strong>the</strong>r approach ispossible with r<strong>and</strong>omness be<strong>in</strong>g considered <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> property <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>series under study which we now denote byξ 1 , ξ 2 , ..., ξ n . (1.9)Here, <strong>the</strong> most simple model consists <strong>in</strong> treat<strong>in</strong>g that set as arealization <strong>of</strong> an n-dimensional r<strong>and</strong>om variable. Such a model can beuseful if <strong>the</strong> experiment provid<strong>in</strong>g it can be repeated many times over,53
- Page 1 and 2: Studies in the History of Statistic
- Page 3 and 4: Introduction by CompilerI am presen
- Page 5 and 6: (Lect. Notes Math., No. 1021, 1983,
- Page 7 and 8: sufficiently securely that a carefu
- Page 9 and 10: is energy?) from chapter 4 of Feynm
- Page 11 and 12: demand to apply transfinite numbers
- Page 13 and 14: for stating that Ω consists of ele
- Page 15 and 16: chances to draw a more suitable apa
- Page 17 and 18: Let the space of elementary events
- Page 19 and 20: 2.3. Independence. When desiring to
- Page 21 and 22: Eξ = ∑ aipi.Our form of definiti
- Page 23 and 24: absolutely precisely if the pertine
- Page 25 and 26: where x is any real number. If dens
- Page 27 and 28: probability can be coupled with an
- Page 29 and 30: Nowadays we are sure that no indepe
- Page 31 and 32: λ = λ(T)with λ(T) being actually
- Page 33 and 34: (1/B n )(m − A n )instead of the
- Page 35 and 36: along with ξ. For example, if ξ i
- Page 37 and 38: µ( − p0) ÷np0 (1 − p0)nhas an
- Page 39 and 40: distribution of the maximal term |s
- Page 41 and 42: ξ (ω) + ... + ξ (ω)n1n{ω :|
- Page 43 and 44: P{max ξ(t) ≥ x} = 0.01, 0 ≤ t
- Page 45 and 46: 1. This example and considerations
- Page 47 and 48: IIV. N. TutubalinTreatment of Obser
- Page 49 and 50: structure of statistical methods, d
- Page 51: Suppose that we have adopted the pa
- Page 55 and 56: It is interesting therefore to see
- Page 57 and 58: is applied with P(t) being a polyno
- Page 59 and 60: ut some mathematical tricks describ
- Page 61 and 62: It is clear therefore that no speci
- Page 63 and 64: of various groups of machines, and
- Page 65 and 66: nnA(λ) x sin λ t, B(λ) = x cosλ
- Page 67 and 68: of the mathematical model of the Br
- Page 69 and 70: dF(λ) = f (λ) dλ, so that B( t
- Page 71 and 72: usually very little of them. Indeed
- Page 73 and 74: This is the celebrated model of aut
- Page 75 and 76: applications of the theory of stoch
- Page 77 and 78: achieved by differentiating because
- Page 79 and 80: u(x 1 , x 2 , t 1 , t 2 ) = v(x 1 ,
- Page 81 and 82: Reasoning based on common sense and
- Page 83 and 84: answering that question is extremel
- Page 85 and 86: IIIV. N. TutubalinThe Boundaries of
- Page 87 and 88: periodograms. It occurred that work
- Page 89 and 90: at point x = 1. However, preceding
- Page 91 and 92: He concludes that since the action
- Page 93 and 94: The verification of the truth of a
- Page 95 and 96: In the purely scientific sense this
- Page 97 and 98: ought to learn at once the simple t
- Page 99 and 100: the material world science had inde
- Page 101 and 102: values of (2.1) realized in the n e
- Page 103 and 104:
*several dozen. The totality µ ica
- Page 105 and 106:
Mendelian laws. It is not sufficien
- Page 107 and 108:
example, the problem of the objecti
- Page 109 and 110:
a linear function is not restricted
- Page 111 and 112:
258 - 82 - 176 cases or 68.5% of al
- Page 113 and 114:
The Framingham investigation indeed
- Page 115 and 116:
or, for discrete observations,IT(ω
- Page 117 and 118:
What objections can be made? First,
- Page 119 and 120:
eliability and queuing are known to
- Page 121 and 122:
Kolman E. (1939 Russian), Perversio
- Page 123 and 124:
measurement is provided. Recently,
- Page 125 and 126:
which means that sooner or later th
- Page 127 and 128:
The foundations of the Mises approa
- Page 129 and 130:
A rather subtle arsenal is develope
- Page 131 and 132:
4.3. General remarks on §§ 4.1 an
- Page 133 and 134:
BibliographyAlimov Yu. I. (1976, 19
- Page 135 and 136:
processes are now going on in the s
- Page 137 and 138:
obtaining a deviation from the theo
- Page 139 and 140:
VIOscar SheyninOn the Bernoulli Law