Notes1. Alimov [iv, § 2.1] <strong>in</strong>troduced extended series <strong>of</strong> observations. O. S.2. Without say<strong>in</strong>g anyth<strong>in</strong>g else, I note that Tutubal<strong>in</strong> himself applied that method<strong>in</strong> a jo<strong>in</strong>t paper (Tutubal<strong>in</strong> et al 2009, p. 189). O. S.3. That <strong>the</strong> electron is <strong>in</strong>exhaustible is Len<strong>in</strong>’s celebrated statement from hisMaterialism <strong>and</strong> Empirical Criticism (1909, <strong>in</strong> Russian). The notion <strong>of</strong> electron is<strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sically contradictory, so perhaps <strong>the</strong> author <strong>in</strong>directly stated <strong>the</strong> same aboutthose tables. Anyway, Len<strong>in</strong>’s statement rema<strong>in</strong>s unjustified. O. S.BibliographyAlimov Yu. I. (1978 Russian), On <strong>the</strong> problem <strong>of</strong> apply<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>of</strong>probability considered by V. N. Tutubal<strong>in</strong>. Avtomatika, No. 1, pp. 71 – 82.En<strong>in</strong> T. K. (1939 Russian), The results <strong>of</strong> an analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> assortment <strong>of</strong> hybrids<strong>of</strong> tomatoes. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 176 – 178. Alsopublished at about <strong>the</strong> same time <strong>in</strong> a foreign language <strong>in</strong> C. r. (Doklady) Acad. Sci.URSS.Ermolaeva N. I. (1939 Russian), Once more about <strong>the</strong> “pea laws”. Jarovizatsia,No. 2, pp. 79 – 86.Kolmogorov A. N. (1940), On a new confirmation <strong>of</strong> Mendel’s laws. C. r.(Doklady) Acad. Sci. URSS, vol. 28, No. 9, pp. 834 – 838.Tutubal<strong>in</strong> V. N. (1972), Teoria Veroiatnostei (Theory <strong>of</strong> probability). Moscow.Tutubal<strong>in</strong> V. N, Barabasheva Yu. M., Devyatkova G. N., Uger E. G. (2009Russian), Kolmogorov’s criteria <strong>and</strong> verification <strong>of</strong> Mendel’s heredity laws. Istoriko-Matematich. Issledovania, ser. 2, issue 13/48, pp. 185 – 197.138
VI<strong>Oscar</strong> Sheyn<strong>in</strong>On <strong>the</strong> Bernoulli Law <strong>of</strong> Large NumbersBernoulli considered (<strong>in</strong>dependent) trials with a constant probability<strong>of</strong> success, <strong>and</strong> rigorously proved that <strong>the</strong> frequency <strong>of</strong> success tendsto that probability. Mises, however, treated collectives, totalities <strong>of</strong>phenomena or events differ<strong>in</strong>g from each o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> some <strong>in</strong>dication, <strong>and</strong>characterized by <strong>the</strong> existence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> limit<strong>in</strong>g frequency <strong>of</strong> success <strong>and</strong>by irregularity. The latter property meant that for any part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>collective that limit<strong>in</strong>g frequency was <strong>the</strong> same.Alimov noted that artificially constructed collectives proved that <strong>the</strong>empirical frequency <strong>of</strong> success can become more stable as <strong>the</strong> number<strong>of</strong> trials <strong>in</strong>creased, but have no limit. Therefore, <strong>the</strong> existence <strong>of</strong> thatlimit is an experimental fact. I have described his viewpo<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> somedetail <strong>in</strong> an Introduction to [v]. Tutubal<strong>in</strong> largely sided with Alimov.In <strong>the</strong> same Ars Conject<strong>and</strong>i, previous to prov<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> LLN,Bernoulli stated that his law was also valid <strong>in</strong> its <strong>in</strong>verse sense (<strong>and</strong> DeMoivre <strong>in</strong>dependently stated <strong>the</strong> same with respect to <strong>the</strong> first version<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> CLT proved by him <strong>in</strong> 1733). In o<strong>the</strong>r words, an unknown <strong>and</strong>even a non-exist<strong>in</strong>g probability (one <strong>of</strong> Bernoulli’s examples) could beestimated by <strong>the</strong> limit<strong>in</strong>g frequency.In a little known companion paper (1765) to his ma<strong>in</strong> memoir(1764), Bayes all but proved his own limit <strong>the</strong>orem explicat<strong>in</strong>g that<strong>in</strong>verse LLN. He did not make <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al step from <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> a largef<strong>in</strong>ite number <strong>of</strong> trials because he opposed <strong>the</strong> application <strong>of</strong> divergentseries which was usual <strong>in</strong> those times. That was done <strong>in</strong> 1908 byTimerd<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong> Editor <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> German translation <strong>of</strong> Bayes, certa<strong>in</strong>lywithout us<strong>in</strong>g divergent series.Bayes – Timerd<strong>in</strong>g exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong> behaviour <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> centred <strong>and</strong>normed r<strong>and</strong>om variable η, <strong>the</strong> unknown probability, (η − Eη)/var ηwhereas <strong>the</strong> direct LLN dealt with <strong>the</strong> frequency ξ, (ξ − Eξ)/varξ. Hisma<strong>in</strong> memoir became widely known <strong>and</strong> for a long time <strong>the</strong> Bayesapproach had been fiercely opposed, partly because an unknownconstant was treated as a r<strong>and</strong>om variable (with a uniformdistribution). Note that varη > varξ which is quite natural s<strong>in</strong>ceprobability is only unknown <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>verse case. For atta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> sameprecision <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>verse case <strong>the</strong>refore dem<strong>and</strong>s more trials than <strong>the</strong> directlaw. Mises could have called Bayes his ma<strong>in</strong> predecessor; actually,however, he only described <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> English ma<strong>the</strong>matician,<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>adequately at that. Bayes completed <strong>the</strong> first stage <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>development <strong>of</strong> probability <strong>the</strong>ory.Alimov’s viewpo<strong>in</strong>t was largely correct s<strong>in</strong>ce he considered an<strong>in</strong>comparably more general pattern than Bernoulli <strong>and</strong> thought about<strong>the</strong> necessary checks, but he [iv] was too radical <strong>in</strong> deny<strong>in</strong>g importantparts <strong>of</strong> ma<strong>the</strong>matical statistics as also too brave <strong>in</strong> alter<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Misesapproach. To borrow an expression from Tutubal<strong>in</strong> [end <strong>of</strong> ii], he<strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>the</strong> Mises approach <strong>of</strong> a light-weighted type.139
- Page 1 and 2:
Studies in the History of Statistic
- Page 3 and 4:
Introduction by CompilerI am presen
- Page 5 and 6:
(Lect. Notes Math., No. 1021, 1983,
- Page 7 and 8:
sufficiently securely that a carefu
- Page 9 and 10:
is energy?) from chapter 4 of Feynm
- Page 11 and 12:
demand to apply transfinite numbers
- Page 13 and 14:
for stating that Ω consists of ele
- Page 15 and 16:
chances to draw a more suitable apa
- Page 17 and 18:
Let the space of elementary events
- Page 19 and 20:
2.3. Independence. When desiring to
- Page 21 and 22:
Eξ = ∑ aipi.Our form of definiti
- Page 23 and 24:
absolutely precisely if the pertine
- Page 25 and 26:
where x is any real number. If dens
- Page 27 and 28:
probability can be coupled with an
- Page 29 and 30:
Nowadays we are sure that no indepe
- Page 31 and 32:
λ = λ(T)with λ(T) being actually
- Page 33 and 34:
(1/B n )(m − A n )instead of the
- Page 35 and 36:
along with ξ. For example, if ξ i
- Page 37 and 38:
µ( − p0) ÷np0 (1 − p0)nhas an
- Page 39 and 40:
distribution of the maximal term |s
- Page 41 and 42:
ξ (ω) + ... + ξ (ω)n1n{ω :|
- Page 43 and 44:
P{max ξ(t) ≥ x} = 0.01, 0 ≤ t
- Page 45 and 46:
1. This example and considerations
- Page 47 and 48:
IIV. N. TutubalinTreatment of Obser
- Page 49 and 50:
structure of statistical methods, d
- Page 51 and 52:
Suppose that we have adopted the pa
- Page 53 and 54:
and the variances are inversely pro
- Page 55 and 56:
It is interesting therefore to see
- Page 57 and 58:
is applied with P(t) being a polyno
- Page 59 and 60:
ut some mathematical tricks describ
- Page 61 and 62:
It is clear therefore that no speci
- Page 63 and 64:
of various groups of machines, and
- Page 65 and 66:
nnA(λ) x sin λ t, B(λ) = x cosλ
- Page 67 and 68:
of the mathematical model of the Br
- Page 69 and 70:
dF(λ) = f (λ) dλ, so that B( t
- Page 71 and 72:
usually very little of them. Indeed
- Page 73 and 74:
This is the celebrated model of aut
- Page 75 and 76:
applications of the theory of stoch
- Page 77 and 78:
achieved by differentiating because
- Page 79 and 80:
u(x 1 , x 2 , t 1 , t 2 ) = v(x 1 ,
- Page 81 and 82:
Reasoning based on common sense and
- Page 83 and 84:
answering that question is extremel
- Page 85 and 86:
IIIV. N. TutubalinThe Boundaries of
- Page 87 and 88: periodograms. It occurred that work
- Page 89 and 90: at point x = 1. However, preceding
- Page 91 and 92: He concludes that since the action
- Page 93 and 94: The verification of the truth of a
- Page 95 and 96: In the purely scientific sense this
- Page 97 and 98: ought to learn at once the simple t
- Page 99 and 100: the material world science had inde
- Page 101 and 102: values of (2.1) realized in the n e
- Page 103 and 104: *several dozen. The totality µ ica
- Page 105 and 106: Mendelian laws. It is not sufficien
- Page 107 and 108: example, the problem of the objecti
- Page 109 and 110: a linear function is not restricted
- Page 111 and 112: 258 - 82 - 176 cases or 68.5% of al
- Page 113 and 114: The Framingham investigation indeed
- Page 115 and 116: or, for discrete observations,IT(ω
- Page 117 and 118: What objections can be made? First,
- Page 119 and 120: eliability and queuing are known to
- Page 121 and 122: Kolman E. (1939 Russian), Perversio
- Page 123 and 124: measurement is provided. Recently,
- Page 125 and 126: which means that sooner or later th
- Page 127 and 128: The foundations of the Mises approa
- Page 129 and 130: A rather subtle arsenal is develope
- Page 131 and 132: 4.3. General remarks on §§ 4.1 an
- Page 133 and 134: BibliographyAlimov Yu. I. (1976, 19
- Page 135 and 136: processes are now going on in the s
- Page 137: obtaining a deviation from the theo