12.07.2015 Views

1 Studies in the History of Statistics and Probability ... - Sheynin, Oscar

1 Studies in the History of Statistics and Probability ... - Sheynin, Oscar

1 Studies in the History of Statistics and Probability ... - Sheynin, Oscar

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Let <strong>the</strong> space <strong>of</strong> elementary events Ω be separated <strong>in</strong>to parts B 1 , B 2 ,..., B n , so that Ω = B1 ∪ B2 ∪... ∪ Bn<strong>and</strong> no two sets B i <strong>and</strong> B j havecommon elements. Then, for any A ⊆ Ω we will haveA = AB1 ∪ AB2 ∪... ∪ ABnwhich means that <strong>the</strong> elementary events <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> A are separated<strong>in</strong>to those enter<strong>in</strong>g B 1 , B 2 , ..., B n <strong>and</strong> obviouslyP(A) = P(AB 1 ) + P(AB 2 ) + ... + P(AB n ).This follows from <strong>the</strong> def<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>of</strong> P(A), see § 2.1.By def<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>of</strong> conditional probabilitynP( A) = P( AB ) = P( B ) P( AB )n∑ ∑ (2.2)i i ii= 1 i=1which is <strong>the</strong> formula <strong>of</strong> complete probability.There is ano<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong> so-called Bayes formulaP( ABi ) P( Bi ) P( A / Bi)P( Bi/ A) = =.nP( A)P( B ) P( A / B )∑i=1ii(2.3)We have derived formulas (2.2) <strong>and</strong> (2.3) by issu<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>the</strong>def<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>of</strong> conditional probability <strong>and</strong> apply<strong>in</strong>g really trivialtransformations. They can not <strong>the</strong>refore be called substantialma<strong>the</strong>matical <strong>the</strong>orems, but <strong>the</strong>y never<strong>the</strong>less play an important part.Let us first consider <strong>the</strong> application <strong>of</strong> formula (2.2). Suppose, for<strong>the</strong> sake <strong>of</strong> def<strong>in</strong>iteness, that event A means that some article isdefective <strong>and</strong> assume also that that event is not by itself statisticallystable; more def<strong>in</strong>itely, that <strong>the</strong>re are mutually exclusive conditions <strong>of</strong>manufactur<strong>in</strong>g B 1 , B 2 , ..., B n such that given B i , it is possible toconsider P(A/B i ) so that statistical stability is present.Suppose now that all <strong>the</strong> products manufactured under thoseconditions are stored without be<strong>in</strong>g sorted out but that <strong>the</strong>ir sharecorrespond<strong>in</strong>g to condition B i is given <strong>and</strong> equal to P(B i ). Considernow an experiment <strong>in</strong> which one article is chosen at r<strong>and</strong>om <strong>and</strong>checked. Two outcomes are possible: A (defective) <strong>and</strong> A (qualitysufficient). Its r<strong>and</strong>om extraction means that such an experiment isstatistically stable, P(A) is expressed by formula (2.2) <strong>and</strong>P( A) = 1 − P( A).Unjustified hope had been previously connected with <strong>the</strong> Bayesformula (2.3) s<strong>in</strong>ce subjective <strong>in</strong>terpretation <strong>of</strong> probability was notruled out. For example, when hav<strong>in</strong>g hypo<strong>the</strong>ses B 1 , B 2 , ..., B n trustedwith probabilities P(B 1 ), P(B 2 ), ..., P(B n ), it was thought that anexperiment was desirable for <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> proper hypo<strong>the</strong>sis.17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!