λ 1 , λ 2 , ..., λ n (1.4)can differ.Theoretically, <strong>the</strong> second case is more general <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>refore, at aglance, more <strong>in</strong>vit<strong>in</strong>g, but we will see now that it does not lead toanyth<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> should be left aside. Indeed, we have to know <strong>the</strong> value<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Poisson parameter λ = Eµ for <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> yearly failuresdur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> test <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>novation had it been <strong>in</strong>effective. However, if<strong>the</strong>re is no connection between <strong>the</strong> numbers (1.4), this parameter is notat all l<strong>in</strong>ked with our observations (1.2). And so, we are unable todeterm<strong>in</strong>e λ . Then, when estimat<strong>in</strong>g (1.4) we should choose estimatorsˆλ ibased on a s<strong>in</strong>gle realization (if we only observed one set <strong>of</strong>mach<strong>in</strong>ery) <strong>and</strong> we can only very roughly assume thatλ ˆ = µ ,...,λ ˆ = µ .1 1nnThus, when choos<strong>in</strong>g a very general model, we are unable todeterm<strong>in</strong>e its parameters which happens always. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r h<strong>and</strong>, aparticular model with equalities (1.3) is able to provide betterapproximationˆλ = µ. (1.5)For <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> an <strong>in</strong>effective <strong>in</strong>novation it is natural to assumeapproximately thatλ = Eµ ≈ ˆλ = µ. (1.6)This particular model enables us, <strong>in</strong> general, to solve our problem,but it has ano<strong>the</strong>r disadvantage: it can be wrong. For example, ag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> mach<strong>in</strong>ery can lead to <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mean number <strong>of</strong> failuresfrom year to year:Eµ 1 < Eµ 2 < ... < Eµ n < Eµ -Here, equality (1.6) will underestimate <strong>the</strong> actual value <strong>of</strong> Eµ. Supposethat ˆλ = 2 but that actually Eµ= 4, <strong>the</strong>n properlyP{µ = 0} = e −4 ≈ 1/55<strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> result <strong>of</strong> our calculation, P ≈ 1/7, see § 1.1, after whichwe will not admit that <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>novation is effective although actuallyalmost surely it is such.We see that when construct<strong>in</strong>g a statistical model we have to choosebetween Scylla <strong>and</strong> Charybdis, that is, between a general model,useless s<strong>in</strong>ce we are unable to def<strong>in</strong>e its parameters <strong>and</strong> a particularmodel, possibly wrong <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>refore lead<strong>in</strong>g to false conclusions. It isonly unknown which is Scylla <strong>and</strong> which is Charybdis.50
Suppose that we have adopted <strong>the</strong> particular model, i. e. declaredthat <strong>the</strong> magnitudes (1.2) are identically distributed r<strong>and</strong>om variables.Will this be <strong>the</strong> sole necessary assumption? No, s<strong>in</strong>ce we badly need toknow how large can be <strong>the</strong> error <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> approximate equality (1.6). Forexample, if ˆλ=2, can <strong>the</strong> real value <strong>of</strong> λ be 4? In o<strong>the</strong>r words, weshould be able to calculate <strong>the</strong> variance <strong>of</strong> (1.5). It is equal tonˆ 1var λ = [ var µ + cov(µ µ )].∑ ∑2i i jn i= 1i≠jFor <strong>the</strong> Poisson lawvarµ i = Eµ i = λ<strong>and</strong>, as a rough estimate, it is possible to assume varµ i = ˆλ µ, = but wecan not say anyth<strong>in</strong>g abut <strong>the</strong> covariations. The available data areusually far from adequate for estimat<strong>in</strong>g it. Noth<strong>in</strong>g is left than tosuppose that <strong>the</strong> variables (1.2) are <strong>in</strong>dependent, i. e. to consider that<strong>the</strong> covariations vanish.We thus arrive at a model <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dependent identically distributedr<strong>and</strong>om variables, that is, to a sample. The reader will probably agreethat our considerations, if not logically prove that only a model <strong>of</strong> asample is useful, are still sufficiently conv<strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> show<strong>in</strong>g that it isdifficult to tear away from <strong>the</strong> sphere <strong>of</strong> ideas lead<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> model <strong>of</strong> asample. It is <strong>the</strong>refore very popular <strong>and</strong> researchers are try<strong>in</strong>g to workwith it provided that its falsity is not proven.The chapters <strong>of</strong> ma<strong>the</strong>matical statistics devoted to samples areundoubtedly <strong>in</strong> its best <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> most developed part. However, <strong>the</strong>model <strong>of</strong> sample is sufficiently (<strong>and</strong> even too) <strong>of</strong>ten wrong. We sawthat if <strong>the</strong> mach<strong>in</strong>ery is ag<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong> observations (1.2) do not compose asample. The same is true when a prelim<strong>in</strong>ary period is <strong>in</strong>volved, when<strong>the</strong> work beg<strong>in</strong>s by elim<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g defects after which <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong>failures drops. O<strong>the</strong>r causes violat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> identity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> variables (1.2) also exist.Their <strong>in</strong>dependence can also be violated. For example, if a failurewill lead to a capital repair with <strong>the</strong> replacement <strong>of</strong> many depreciatedalthough still workable mach<strong>in</strong>e parts, a negative correlation betweenµ i <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> depreciated <strong>and</strong> worn-out µ j will appear. If, however, <strong>the</strong>wear <strong>and</strong> tear <strong>of</strong> a mach<strong>in</strong>e part <strong>in</strong>tensifies <strong>the</strong> depreciation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rparts <strong>and</strong> no replacements are made, <strong>the</strong> appeared correlation will bepositive.When <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g models differ<strong>in</strong>g from a model <strong>of</strong> a sample, weshould evidently specify <strong>the</strong>ir dist<strong>in</strong>ction by a small number <strong>of</strong>parameters determ<strong>in</strong>able ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>oretically or by available statisticaldata. Complicated models, as stated above, are absolutely useless. It ispractically possible to allow for ei<strong>the</strong>r deviations from <strong>the</strong> identity <strong>of</strong>distributions given by determ<strong>in</strong>ate functions or from <strong>in</strong>dependenceprovided that identity is preserved. We will now consider such models.It should be borne <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d that both <strong>the</strong>se models <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> model <strong>of</strong>sample are sufficiently tentative. True, if a model is proper, our51
- Page 1 and 2: Studies in the History of Statistic
- Page 3 and 4: Introduction by CompilerI am presen
- Page 5 and 6: (Lect. Notes Math., No. 1021, 1983,
- Page 7 and 8: sufficiently securely that a carefu
- Page 9 and 10: is energy?) from chapter 4 of Feynm
- Page 11 and 12: demand to apply transfinite numbers
- Page 13 and 14: for stating that Ω consists of ele
- Page 15 and 16: chances to draw a more suitable apa
- Page 17 and 18: Let the space of elementary events
- Page 19 and 20: 2.3. Independence. When desiring to
- Page 21 and 22: Eξ = ∑ aipi.Our form of definiti
- Page 23 and 24: absolutely precisely if the pertine
- Page 25 and 26: where x is any real number. If dens
- Page 27 and 28: probability can be coupled with an
- Page 29 and 30: Nowadays we are sure that no indepe
- Page 31 and 32: λ = λ(T)with λ(T) being actually
- Page 33 and 34: (1/B n )(m − A n )instead of the
- Page 35 and 36: along with ξ. For example, if ξ i
- Page 37 and 38: µ( − p0) ÷np0 (1 − p0)nhas an
- Page 39 and 40: distribution of the maximal term |s
- Page 41 and 42: ξ (ω) + ... + ξ (ω)n1n{ω :|
- Page 43 and 44: P{max ξ(t) ≥ x} = 0.01, 0 ≤ t
- Page 45 and 46: 1. This example and considerations
- Page 47 and 48: IIV. N. TutubalinTreatment of Obser
- Page 49: structure of statistical methods, d
- Page 53 and 54: and the variances are inversely pro
- Page 55 and 56: It is interesting therefore to see
- Page 57 and 58: is applied with P(t) being a polyno
- Page 59 and 60: ut some mathematical tricks describ
- Page 61 and 62: It is clear therefore that no speci
- Page 63 and 64: of various groups of machines, and
- Page 65 and 66: nnA(λ) x sin λ t, B(λ) = x cosλ
- Page 67 and 68: of the mathematical model of the Br
- Page 69 and 70: dF(λ) = f (λ) dλ, so that B( t
- Page 71 and 72: usually very little of them. Indeed
- Page 73 and 74: This is the celebrated model of aut
- Page 75 and 76: applications of the theory of stoch
- Page 77 and 78: achieved by differentiating because
- Page 79 and 80: u(x 1 , x 2 , t 1 , t 2 ) = v(x 1 ,
- Page 81 and 82: Reasoning based on common sense and
- Page 83 and 84: answering that question is extremel
- Page 85 and 86: IIIV. N. TutubalinThe Boundaries of
- Page 87 and 88: periodograms. It occurred that work
- Page 89 and 90: at point x = 1. However, preceding
- Page 91 and 92: He concludes that since the action
- Page 93 and 94: The verification of the truth of a
- Page 95 and 96: In the purely scientific sense this
- Page 97 and 98: ought to learn at once the simple t
- Page 99 and 100: the material world science had inde
- Page 101 and 102:
values of (2.1) realized in the n e
- Page 103 and 104:
*several dozen. The totality µ ica
- Page 105 and 106:
Mendelian laws. It is not sufficien
- Page 107 and 108:
example, the problem of the objecti
- Page 109 and 110:
a linear function is not restricted
- Page 111 and 112:
258 - 82 - 176 cases or 68.5% of al
- Page 113 and 114:
The Framingham investigation indeed
- Page 115 and 116:
or, for discrete observations,IT(ω
- Page 117 and 118:
What objections can be made? First,
- Page 119 and 120:
eliability and queuing are known to
- Page 121 and 122:
Kolman E. (1939 Russian), Perversio
- Page 123 and 124:
measurement is provided. Recently,
- Page 125 and 126:
which means that sooner or later th
- Page 127 and 128:
The foundations of the Mises approa
- Page 129 and 130:
A rather subtle arsenal is develope
- Page 131 and 132:
4.3. General remarks on §§ 4.1 an
- Page 133 and 134:
BibliographyAlimov Yu. I. (1976, 19
- Page 135 and 136:
processes are now going on in the s
- Page 137 and 138:
obtaining a deviation from the theo
- Page 139 and 140:
VIOscar SheyninOn the Bernoulli Law