12.07.2015 Views

1 Studies in the History of Statistics and Probability ... - Sheynin, Oscar

1 Studies in the History of Statistics and Probability ... - Sheynin, Oscar

1 Studies in the History of Statistics and Probability ... - Sheynin, Oscar

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Suppose that we have adopted <strong>the</strong> particular model, i. e. declaredthat <strong>the</strong> magnitudes (1.2) are identically distributed r<strong>and</strong>om variables.Will this be <strong>the</strong> sole necessary assumption? No, s<strong>in</strong>ce we badly need toknow how large can be <strong>the</strong> error <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> approximate equality (1.6). Forexample, if ˆλ=2, can <strong>the</strong> real value <strong>of</strong> λ be 4? In o<strong>the</strong>r words, weshould be able to calculate <strong>the</strong> variance <strong>of</strong> (1.5). It is equal tonˆ 1var λ = [ var µ + cov(µ µ )].∑ ∑2i i jn i= 1i≠jFor <strong>the</strong> Poisson lawvarµ i = Eµ i = λ<strong>and</strong>, as a rough estimate, it is possible to assume varµ i = ˆλ µ, = but wecan not say anyth<strong>in</strong>g abut <strong>the</strong> covariations. The available data areusually far from adequate for estimat<strong>in</strong>g it. Noth<strong>in</strong>g is left than tosuppose that <strong>the</strong> variables (1.2) are <strong>in</strong>dependent, i. e. to consider that<strong>the</strong> covariations vanish.We thus arrive at a model <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dependent identically distributedr<strong>and</strong>om variables, that is, to a sample. The reader will probably agreethat our considerations, if not logically prove that only a model <strong>of</strong> asample is useful, are still sufficiently conv<strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> show<strong>in</strong>g that it isdifficult to tear away from <strong>the</strong> sphere <strong>of</strong> ideas lead<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> model <strong>of</strong> asample. It is <strong>the</strong>refore very popular <strong>and</strong> researchers are try<strong>in</strong>g to workwith it provided that its falsity is not proven.The chapters <strong>of</strong> ma<strong>the</strong>matical statistics devoted to samples areundoubtedly <strong>in</strong> its best <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> most developed part. However, <strong>the</strong>model <strong>of</strong> sample is sufficiently (<strong>and</strong> even too) <strong>of</strong>ten wrong. We sawthat if <strong>the</strong> mach<strong>in</strong>ery is ag<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong> observations (1.2) do not compose asample. The same is true when a prelim<strong>in</strong>ary period is <strong>in</strong>volved, when<strong>the</strong> work beg<strong>in</strong>s by elim<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g defects after which <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong>failures drops. O<strong>the</strong>r causes violat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> identity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> variables (1.2) also exist.Their <strong>in</strong>dependence can also be violated. For example, if a failurewill lead to a capital repair with <strong>the</strong> replacement <strong>of</strong> many depreciatedalthough still workable mach<strong>in</strong>e parts, a negative correlation betweenµ i <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> depreciated <strong>and</strong> worn-out µ j will appear. If, however, <strong>the</strong>wear <strong>and</strong> tear <strong>of</strong> a mach<strong>in</strong>e part <strong>in</strong>tensifies <strong>the</strong> depreciation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rparts <strong>and</strong> no replacements are made, <strong>the</strong> appeared correlation will bepositive.When <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g models differ<strong>in</strong>g from a model <strong>of</strong> a sample, weshould evidently specify <strong>the</strong>ir dist<strong>in</strong>ction by a small number <strong>of</strong>parameters determ<strong>in</strong>able ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>oretically or by available statisticaldata. Complicated models, as stated above, are absolutely useless. It ispractically possible to allow for ei<strong>the</strong>r deviations from <strong>the</strong> identity <strong>of</strong>distributions given by determ<strong>in</strong>ate functions or from <strong>in</strong>dependenceprovided that identity is preserved. We will now consider such models.It should be borne <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d that both <strong>the</strong>se models <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> model <strong>of</strong>sample are sufficiently tentative. True, if a model is proper, our51

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!