12.07.2015 Views

1 Studies in the History of Statistics and Probability ... - Sheynin, Oscar

1 Studies in the History of Statistics and Probability ... - Sheynin, Oscar

1 Studies in the History of Statistics and Probability ... - Sheynin, Oscar

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

i. e., if many observational series can be obta<strong>in</strong>ed under similarstatistically homogeneous conditions. More <strong>of</strong>ten, however, we haveonly one such series, distributions <strong>of</strong> probabilities certa<strong>in</strong>ly can not bereconstructed <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> model <strong>of</strong> an n-dimensional distribution isabsolutely useless. However, if we assume that <strong>the</strong> jo<strong>in</strong>t distribution <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> magnitude ξ 1 , ξ 2 , is <strong>the</strong> same as that <strong>of</strong> ξ 2 , ξ 3 , <strong>of</strong> ξ 3 , ξ 4 , etc, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong>pairs (ξ 1 , ξ 2 ), (ξ 2 , ξ 3 ),..., (ξ n−1 , ξ n ) provide many realizations, althoughperhaps not mutually <strong>in</strong>dependent, <strong>of</strong> that bivariate distribution. Such adistribution is <strong>the</strong>refore determ<strong>in</strong>able <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciple.It is convenient to generalize somewhat <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>the</strong>matical model. Letus consider a sequence <strong>of</strong> r<strong>and</strong>om variables <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ite <strong>in</strong> both directions... ξ −1 , ξ 0 , ξ 1 , ξ 2 , ..., ξ n , ξ n+1 , ... (1.10)called a stochastic process. We assume that <strong>the</strong>oretically <strong>the</strong>re existdistributions <strong>of</strong> probabilities <strong>of</strong> any f<strong>in</strong>ite set{ξ α , ξ β , ξ γ } (1.11)<strong>of</strong> r<strong>and</strong>om variables. Our observational series (1.9) is a part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ite sequence (1.10) <strong>and</strong> only allows us to reach some conclusionsabout that whole process if <strong>the</strong> model <strong>in</strong>cludes a rule represent<strong>in</strong>gdistributions <strong>of</strong> magnitudes (1.11) with negative <strong>and</strong> large positivesubscripts through <strong>the</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> observed variables (1.9).Without such a rule <strong>the</strong> model <strong>of</strong> a stochastic process is useless.In <strong>the</strong> most simple <strong>and</strong> most natural case <strong>the</strong> condition <strong>of</strong>stationarity is imposed: for any τ <strong>the</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> variables (ξ α+τ ,..., ξ γ+ τ ) co<strong>in</strong>cides with that for τ = 0. The model <strong>of</strong> a stochasticprocess consists <strong>in</strong> that [now] we consider our observations (1.9) as apart <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> realization (1.10) <strong>of</strong> a stationary stochastic process.When assum<strong>in</strong>g a model <strong>of</strong> a stochastic process, only bivariatedistributions are usually applied <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> addition only <strong>the</strong> correlationbetween <strong>the</strong> different values <strong>of</strong> that process are studied. It ought to besaid that <strong>in</strong> spite <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> popularity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> concept <strong>of</strong> stochastic process,only quite a few examples can be cited <strong>in</strong> which it allowed to describeadequately <strong>the</strong> statistical properties <strong>of</strong> observational series. Mostpublications beg<strong>in</strong> by stat<strong>in</strong>g that a pert<strong>in</strong>ent stochastic processspecified <strong>in</strong> such <strong>and</strong> such a way is given, but <strong>the</strong>re really are only afew works where <strong>the</strong>se specifications are <strong>in</strong>deed determ<strong>in</strong>ed<strong>the</strong>oretically or experimentally.The <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> stochastic processes is here suitable for solv<strong>in</strong>gabstract problems: what will happen if a white noise <strong>of</strong> a given<strong>in</strong>tensity <strong>in</strong>fluences some system. Such problems, however, only<strong>in</strong>directly bear on <strong>the</strong> real behaviour <strong>of</strong> a system because under realconditions it is not likely <strong>the</strong> white noise that <strong>in</strong>fluences <strong>the</strong> system, –it does not even concern a stochastic process (lack <strong>of</strong> statisticalhomogeneity). But meanwhile <strong>of</strong>ten no one studies what is reallyact<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong> system because such <strong>in</strong>vestigations are complicated,difficult <strong>and</strong> expensive so that it is much easier to restrict <strong>the</strong> attentionto arbitrary prior assumptions.54

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!