peculiar for <strong>the</strong> foundations <strong>of</strong> physics but remote from experiment.Advisable here are efficient phenomenal models without specialclaims to fundamentalism. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciple <strong>of</strong> equal stability<strong>of</strong> all <strong>the</strong> elements <strong>of</strong> an applied <strong>in</strong>vestigation, <strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>of</strong>complicated ma<strong>the</strong>matics should be considered guardedly. I concludeby quot<strong>in</strong>g Wiener (1966 from Russian), hardly an opponent <strong>of</strong>ma<strong>the</strong>matization:Advancement <strong>of</strong> ma<strong>the</strong>matical physics caused sociologists to bejealous <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> power <strong>of</strong> its methods but was hardly accompanied by<strong>the</strong>ir dist<strong>in</strong>ct underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tellectual sources <strong>of</strong> that power.[...] Some backward nations borrowed Western clo<strong>the</strong>s <strong>and</strong>parliamentary forms lack<strong>in</strong>g personality <strong>and</strong> national dist<strong>in</strong>ctivemarks, vaguely believ<strong>in</strong>g as though <strong>the</strong>se magic garments <strong>and</strong>ceremonies will at once br<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>m nearer to modern culture <strong>and</strong>technology, − so also economists began to dress <strong>the</strong>ir very <strong>in</strong>exactideas <strong>in</strong> rigorous formulas <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegral <strong>and</strong> differential calculuses. [...]However difficult is <strong>the</strong> selection <strong>of</strong> reliable data <strong>in</strong> physics, it is muchmore difficult to collect vast economic or sociological <strong>in</strong>formationconsist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> numerous series <strong>of</strong> homogeneous data. [...] Under <strong>the</strong>secircumstances, it is hopeless to secure too precise def<strong>in</strong>itions <strong>of</strong>magnitudes brought <strong>in</strong>to play. To attribute to such magnitudes,<strong>in</strong>determ<strong>in</strong>ate <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir very essence, some special precision is useless.Whatever is <strong>the</strong> excuse, application <strong>of</strong> precise formulas to <strong>the</strong>se to<strong>of</strong>reely determ<strong>in</strong>ed magnitudes is noth<strong>in</strong>g but a deception, a va<strong>in</strong> waste<strong>of</strong> time.Notes1. Both r<strong>and</strong>omization <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Monte Carlo method are mentioned by Prokhorov(1999) <strong>and</strong> Dodge (2003). Tutubal<strong>in</strong>, who had sided with Alimov, later applied <strong>the</strong>Monte Carlo method <strong>in</strong> a jo<strong>in</strong>t contribution (Tutubal<strong>in</strong> et al 2009, p. 189). O. S.2. Concern<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> probability <strong>the</strong> author was likely wrong, see Tutubal<strong>in</strong>[i, § 4.2], who [i, § 4.5] also remarked that for natural science <strong>the</strong> significance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>LLN only consisted <strong>in</strong> reflect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> experimental fact <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> stability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mean.The author’s next sentence had to do with <strong>the</strong> application <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> LLN to statistics, bu<strong>the</strong> only stated what that <strong>the</strong>orem did not achieve.Concern<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> CLT I quote Kolmogorov (1956, p. 269): Even now, it is difficultto overestimate [its] importance. O. S.3. In spite <strong>of</strong> numerous efforts made, <strong>the</strong> Mises approach rema<strong>in</strong>s actuallyquestionable, see end <strong>of</strong> [vi]. O. S.4. It is worthwhile to quote ano<strong>the</strong>r def<strong>in</strong>ition (Kolmogorov & Prokhorov1974/1977, p. 721):[Ma<strong>the</strong>matical statistics is] <strong>the</strong> branch <strong>of</strong> ma<strong>the</strong>matics devoted to <strong>the</strong>ma<strong>the</strong>matical methods for <strong>the</strong> systematization, analysis <strong>and</strong> use <strong>of</strong> statistical data for<strong>the</strong> draw<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> scientific <strong>and</strong> practical <strong>in</strong>ferences. O. S.5. See <strong>the</strong> Introduction to [v]. O. S.6. I illustrate pr<strong>in</strong>cipal <strong>and</strong> secondary magnitudes (§ 2.6) by Kolmogorov’sreason<strong>in</strong>g. Frequency µ/n tends to probability p, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> probability P(|µ/n − p| < ε) isa secondary magnitude which <strong>in</strong> turn should be measured as well. O. S.7. This statement is not altoge<strong>the</strong>r correct. See Wilks (1962, Chapter 11) <strong>and</strong>Walsh (1962) who discuss non-parametric estimation <strong>and</strong> order statisticsrespectively. O. S.8. Perhaps Kolmogorov (1963). O. S.132
BibliographyAlimov Yu. I. (1976, 1977, 1978b), Elementy Teorii Eksperimenta (Elements <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> Theory <strong>of</strong> Experiments), pts 1 – 3. Sverdlovsk.--- (1978a Russian), On <strong>the</strong> applications <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> probability considered <strong>in</strong>V. N. Tutubal<strong>in</strong>’s works. Avtomatika, No. 1, pp. 71 – 82.--- (1979 Russian), Once more about realism <strong>and</strong> fantasy <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> applications <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><strong>the</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> probability. Ibidem, No 4, pp. 103 – 110.Anscombe F. J. (1967), Topics <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestigation <strong>of</strong> l<strong>in</strong>ear relations. J. Roy.Stat. Soc., vol. B 29, pp. 1 – 52.Blekhman I. I., Myshkis A. D., Panovko Ya. G. (1976), Prikladnaia Matematika(Applied Math.). Kiev.Dodge Y. (2003), Oxford Dictionary <strong>of</strong> Statistical Terms. Oxford.Grekova I. (1976 Russian), Special methodical features <strong>of</strong> applied ma<strong>the</strong>maticson <strong>the</strong> current stage <strong>of</strong> its development. Voprosy Filos<strong>of</strong>ii No. 6, pp. 104 – 114.Kitaigorodsky A. I. (1978), Molekuliarnye Sily (Molecular Forces). Moscow.Knut D. E. (1977 Russian), The Art <strong>of</strong> Computer Progamm<strong>in</strong>g, vol. 2. Moscow.The author referred to this Russian edition.Kolmogorov A. N. (1956 Russian), Theory <strong>of</strong> probability. In: Matematika. EeSoderzanie, Metody i Znachenie (Ma<strong>the</strong>matics. Its Contents, Methods <strong>and</strong>Importance), vol. 2. Moscow, pp. 252 – 284.Kolmogorov A. N., Prokhorov Yu. V. (1974 Russian), <strong>Statistics</strong>. Great Sov.Enc., 3 rd ed., English version, 1977, vol. 15, pp. 721 – 725.Nikit<strong>in</strong>a E. P., Freidl<strong>in</strong>a V. D., Yarkho A. V. (1972), Kollekzia OpredeleniyTerm<strong>in</strong>a “Statistika” (Collection <strong>of</strong> Def<strong>in</strong>itions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Term “<strong>Statistics</strong>”). Moscow.Postnikov A. G. (1960), Arifmeticheskoe Modelirovanie Slucha<strong>in</strong>ykh Prozessov(Arithmetical Modell<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> Stochastic Processes). Moscow. Perhaps <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong>author’s Izbrannye Trudy (Sel. Works). Moscow, 2005.Prognostication (1975 Russian), Great Sov. Enc., 3 rd ed., English version, vol. 21,1978.Prokhorov Yu. V., Editor (1999), Veroiatnost i Matematicheskaia Statistika.Enziklopedia (<strong>Probability</strong> <strong>and</strong> Math. <strong>Statistics</strong>. An Enc.). Moscow.Shafer G., Vovk V. (2001), <strong>Probability</strong> <strong>and</strong> F<strong>in</strong>ance. It’s Only a Game. NewYork.Tutubal<strong>in</strong> V. N. (1972), Teoria veroiatnostei (Theory <strong>of</strong> <strong>Probability</strong>). Moscow.Tutubal<strong>in</strong> V. N., Barabasheva Yu. M., Devyatkova G. N., Uger E. G. (2009Russian), Kolmogorov’s criteria <strong>and</strong> Mendel’s heredity laws. Istoriko-Matematich.Issledovania, ser. 2, No. 13/48, pp. 185 – 197.Venikov V. A. (1978), Perekhodnye Elektromekhanicheskie Prozessy vElektricheskikh Sistemakh. Moscow.Vysotsky M. (1979), Pod Znakom Integrala (Under <strong>the</strong> Sign <strong>of</strong> Integral).Moscow.Walsh J. E. (1962), Nonparametric confidence <strong>in</strong>tervals <strong>and</strong> tolerance regions. In:Sarhan A. E., Greenberg B. G., Editors, Contributions to Order <strong>Statistics</strong>. New York– London, pp. 136 – 143.Wiener N. (1966 Russian), Tvorez i Robot (Creator <strong>and</strong> Robot). Moscow. Theauthor referred to this Russian edition. German: possibly Mensch undMenschenmasch<strong>in</strong>e.Wilks S. S. (1962), Ma<strong>the</strong>matical <strong>Statistics</strong>. New York.133
- Page 1 and 2:
Studies in the History of Statistic
- Page 3 and 4:
Introduction by CompilerI am presen
- Page 5 and 6:
(Lect. Notes Math., No. 1021, 1983,
- Page 7 and 8:
sufficiently securely that a carefu
- Page 9 and 10:
is energy?) from chapter 4 of Feynm
- Page 11 and 12:
demand to apply transfinite numbers
- Page 13 and 14:
for stating that Ω consists of ele
- Page 15 and 16:
chances to draw a more suitable apa
- Page 17 and 18:
Let the space of elementary events
- Page 19 and 20:
2.3. Independence. When desiring to
- Page 21 and 22:
Eξ = ∑ aipi.Our form of definiti
- Page 23 and 24:
absolutely precisely if the pertine
- Page 25 and 26:
where x is any real number. If dens
- Page 27 and 28:
probability can be coupled with an
- Page 29 and 30:
Nowadays we are sure that no indepe
- Page 31 and 32:
λ = λ(T)with λ(T) being actually
- Page 33 and 34:
(1/B n )(m − A n )instead of the
- Page 35 and 36:
along with ξ. For example, if ξ i
- Page 37 and 38:
µ( − p0) ÷np0 (1 − p0)nhas an
- Page 39 and 40:
distribution of the maximal term |s
- Page 41 and 42:
ξ (ω) + ... + ξ (ω)n1n{ω :|
- Page 43 and 44:
P{max ξ(t) ≥ x} = 0.01, 0 ≤ t
- Page 45 and 46:
1. This example and considerations
- Page 47 and 48:
IIV. N. TutubalinTreatment of Obser
- Page 49 and 50:
structure of statistical methods, d
- Page 51 and 52:
Suppose that we have adopted the pa
- Page 53 and 54:
and the variances are inversely pro
- Page 55 and 56:
It is interesting therefore to see
- Page 57 and 58:
is applied with P(t) being a polyno
- Page 59 and 60:
ut some mathematical tricks describ
- Page 61 and 62:
It is clear therefore that no speci
- Page 63 and 64:
of various groups of machines, and
- Page 65 and 66:
nnA(λ) x sin λ t, B(λ) = x cosλ
- Page 67 and 68:
of the mathematical model of the Br
- Page 69 and 70:
dF(λ) = f (λ) dλ, so that B( t
- Page 71 and 72:
usually very little of them. Indeed
- Page 73 and 74:
This is the celebrated model of aut
- Page 75 and 76:
applications of the theory of stoch
- Page 77 and 78:
achieved by differentiating because
- Page 79 and 80:
u(x 1 , x 2 , t 1 , t 2 ) = v(x 1 ,
- Page 81 and 82: Reasoning based on common sense and
- Page 83 and 84: answering that question is extremel
- Page 85 and 86: IIIV. N. TutubalinThe Boundaries of
- Page 87 and 88: periodograms. It occurred that work
- Page 89 and 90: at point x = 1. However, preceding
- Page 91 and 92: He concludes that since the action
- Page 93 and 94: The verification of the truth of a
- Page 95 and 96: In the purely scientific sense this
- Page 97 and 98: ought to learn at once the simple t
- Page 99 and 100: the material world science had inde
- Page 101 and 102: values of (2.1) realized in the n e
- Page 103 and 104: *several dozen. The totality µ ica
- Page 105 and 106: Mendelian laws. It is not sufficien
- Page 107 and 108: example, the problem of the objecti
- Page 109 and 110: a linear function is not restricted
- Page 111 and 112: 258 - 82 - 176 cases or 68.5% of al
- Page 113 and 114: The Framingham investigation indeed
- Page 115 and 116: or, for discrete observations,IT(ω
- Page 117 and 118: What objections can be made? First,
- Page 119 and 120: eliability and queuing are known to
- Page 121 and 122: Kolman E. (1939 Russian), Perversio
- Page 123 and 124: measurement is provided. Recently,
- Page 125 and 126: which means that sooner or later th
- Page 127 and 128: The foundations of the Mises approa
- Page 129 and 130: A rather subtle arsenal is develope
- Page 131: 4.3. General remarks on §§ 4.1 an
- Page 135 and 136: processes are now going on in the s
- Page 137 and 138: obtaining a deviation from the theo
- Page 139 and 140: VIOscar SheyninOn the Bernoulli Law