12.07.2015 Views

1 Studies in the History of Statistics and Probability ... - Sheynin, Oscar

1 Studies in the History of Statistics and Probability ... - Sheynin, Oscar

1 Studies in the History of Statistics and Probability ... - Sheynin, Oscar

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Eξ = ∑ aipi.Our form <strong>of</strong> def<strong>in</strong>ition is however more convenient for prov<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><strong>the</strong>orems on <strong>the</strong> properties <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> expectation. Let us prove, forexample, [<strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>orem about <strong>the</strong> expectation <strong>of</strong> a sum <strong>of</strong> variables].[...] In many textbooks that statement is proved defectively. [...]The second most important parameter <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong> ar<strong>and</strong>om variable is variance.Def<strong>in</strong>ition. [...]For r<strong>and</strong>om variables as also for events, <strong>the</strong> concept <strong>of</strong><strong>in</strong>dependence is most important. We def<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>dependence (<strong>in</strong> totality)for three r<strong>and</strong>om variables, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> def<strong>in</strong>ition is similar for any number<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m.Def<strong>in</strong>ition. [...]We will prove that for <strong>in</strong>dependent r<strong>and</strong>om variablesE(ξ ⋅ η⋅ ς) = Eξ ⋅ Eη⋅Eς.Pro<strong>of</strong>. [...]It easily follows that <strong>the</strong> variance <strong>of</strong> a sum <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dependent r<strong>and</strong>omvariables is equal to <strong>the</strong> sum <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> variances <strong>of</strong> its terms.We have concluded <strong>the</strong> exposition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> stochastic conceptsfor <strong>the</strong> discrete case, when <strong>the</strong> experiment has [only] a f<strong>in</strong>ite or acountable number <strong>of</strong> elementary outcomes. Now, we have to considerwhat happens when it is more natural to describe <strong>the</strong> experiment by amore complicated space.2.5. Transition to <strong>the</strong> general space <strong>of</strong> elementary events. If anexperiment results <strong>in</strong> some measurement, it is possible to state that,s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> precision <strong>of</strong> all measurements is only f<strong>in</strong>ite, <strong>the</strong> set <strong>of</strong>elementary outcomes will at most be countable. However, <strong>the</strong> history<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> science <strong>in</strong>dicates that physical <strong>the</strong>ories are muchsimplified by consider<strong>in</strong>g cont<strong>in</strong>uous models for which experimentalresults can be any number. Differential equations can only be applied<strong>in</strong> such models.Readers, familiar with difference equations will easily imag<strong>in</strong>e howmore elegant <strong>and</strong> simple are <strong>the</strong> differential equations. Thus, althoughmodern physics has some vague ideas about <strong>the</strong> possible discreteness<strong>of</strong> space, it certa<strong>in</strong>ly is not at all easy to ab<strong>and</strong>on <strong>the</strong> notion <strong>of</strong>cont<strong>in</strong>uum. And, allow<strong>in</strong>g that notion, what k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> probability <strong>the</strong>oryshould we have? The answer to this question is given by <strong>the</strong>celebrated Kolmogorov axiomatics (Kolmogorov 1933; Feller 1950<strong>and</strong> 1966). Its foundation is <strong>the</strong> notion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> space <strong>of</strong> elementaryoutcomes Ω which can now be arbitrary. Some (but not all!) <strong>of</strong> itssubspaces are held to be so to say observable as an experimental result<strong>and</strong> called events. If A is an event, we are able to say whe<strong>the</strong>r itoccurred <strong>in</strong> an experiment or not <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> this sense it is observable. Wemay thus discuss <strong>the</strong> frequency <strong>of</strong> its occurrence <strong>and</strong> consequently <strong>the</strong>probability P(A).The ma<strong>in</strong> dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Kolmogorov axiomatics conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g asthough <strong>in</strong> embryo <strong>the</strong> merits <strong>and</strong> shortcom<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> entire <strong>the</strong>ory isthat, given a countable set <strong>of</strong> events A 1 , A 2 , ..., A n , ..., <strong>the</strong>ir sum <strong>and</strong>21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!