12.07.2015 Views

1 Studies in the History of Statistics and Probability ... - Sheynin, Oscar

1 Studies in the History of Statistics and Probability ... - Sheynin, Oscar

1 Studies in the History of Statistics and Probability ... - Sheynin, Oscar

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

usually very little <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m. Indeed, we may trace <strong>the</strong> change <strong>of</strong> someeconomic <strong>in</strong>dicator over decades or at best over a few centuries (as <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Beveridge series). A year usually means oneobservation (o<strong>the</strong>rwise seasonal periodicity which we should somehowdeal with will <strong>in</strong>terfere, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> general most economic <strong>in</strong>dicators arecalculated on a yearly basis). We <strong>the</strong>refore have tens or hundreds <strong>of</strong>observations whereas calculations show that for a reliable estimate <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> correlation function or spectral density we need thous<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> tens<strong>of</strong> thous<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m. Already Kendall (1946) formulated thisconclusion <strong>in</strong> respect <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> former.As a result, ma<strong>the</strong>maticians attempt to atta<strong>in</strong> someth<strong>in</strong>g by select<strong>in</strong>gan optimal method <strong>of</strong> smooth<strong>in</strong>g periodograms, but with a smallnumber <strong>of</strong> observations this method is generally hopeless. The realapplicability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> stochastic processes is <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> spherewhere any number <strong>of</strong> observations is available. Radio physicists havelong ago developed methods allow<strong>in</strong>g easily <strong>and</strong> simply to obta<strong>in</strong>estimates <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> spectrum <strong>of</strong> a stochastic process if unnecessary toeconomize on <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> observations. They apply systems <strong>of</strong>filters separat<strong>in</strong>g b<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> frequencies (Mon<strong>in</strong> & Jaglom 1967, pt. 2).3.4. A survey <strong>of</strong> practical applications. Among <strong>the</strong> creators <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><strong>the</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> stochastic processes who had also dealt with statisticalmaterials we should mention Yale, Slutsky <strong>and</strong> M. G. Kendall (<strong>and</strong>most important are Kolmogorov’s contributions, see below). Thoseworks had appeared even before World War II, that is, when automaticmeans <strong>of</strong> treat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> material were unavailable, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>se pioneershad to work with hundreds <strong>of</strong> observations at <strong>the</strong> most.Thous<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> tens <strong>of</strong> thous<strong>and</strong>s are needed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> correlation<strong>the</strong>ory because we are attempt<strong>in</strong>g to f<strong>in</strong>d out too much, not an estimate<strong>of</strong> one or a few parameters, but <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>itely many magnitudes B(u), u =0, 1, 2, ... i. e. <strong>the</strong> correlation function (or spectral density, <strong>the</strong> functionf(λ) for λ tak<strong>in</strong>g values on [− π, π]).We can choose ano<strong>the</strong>r approach for achiev<strong>in</strong>g practically effectivemethods <strong>of</strong> correlation <strong>the</strong>ory when hav<strong>in</strong>g a small number <strong>of</strong>observations, namely, look<strong>in</strong>g for models depend<strong>in</strong>g on a smallnumber <strong>of</strong> parameters. Slutsky provided one such model, <strong>the</strong> model <strong>of</strong>mov<strong>in</strong>g average. Imag<strong>in</strong>e an <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ite sequence <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dependentidentically distributed r<strong>and</strong>om variables... ξ −1 , ξ 0 , ξ 1 , ..., ξ n , ...<strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> which we observe <strong>the</strong> sequence... ς −1 , ς 0, ς 1, .. , ς n, ... (3.6)wheremς = ∑ α ξ .(3.7)n k n−kk = 0In o<strong>the</strong>r words, ς n is a sum <strong>of</strong> some number <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dependentmagnitudes ξ n−k multiplied by suitable α k . Slutsky modelled <strong>the</strong> system71

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!