Actually, however, only <strong>the</strong> parameter <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> distribution is studied. Itsestimate is usually found by treat<strong>in</strong>g all <strong>the</strong> data as a s<strong>in</strong>gle entity. Inma<strong>the</strong>matical statistics, this procedure is accompanied by imag<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gmany additional samples, presum<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> postulate <strong>of</strong> § 3.6.1 <strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>dependence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> trials.The alternative is to discuss, as far as possible, only r<strong>and</strong>omvariables really measured <strong>in</strong> long series <strong>of</strong> trials <strong>and</strong> to keep to <strong>the</strong>pattern <strong>of</strong> one extended series. When several series are available, <strong>the</strong>method <strong>of</strong> maximal likelihood will provide several optimal estimates,so which is <strong>the</strong> most optimal? Not less strange will be <strong>the</strong> concept <strong>of</strong>confidence <strong>in</strong>terval.3.6.3. Postulate on <strong>in</strong>dependence <strong>of</strong> trials. For ma<strong>the</strong>maticalstatistics, it occupies <strong>in</strong> some sense a central position because it l<strong>in</strong>ks<strong>the</strong> postulates <strong>of</strong> §§ 3.6.1 <strong>and</strong> 3.6.2. However, it is hardly elementary,see Chapter 4.3.7. The choice <strong>of</strong> a threshold for discern<strong>in</strong>g. In its very essence itis <strong>in</strong>tuitive <strong>and</strong> unavoidable for verify<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> compar<strong>in</strong>g variousstatistical hypo<strong>the</strong>ses with each o<strong>the</strong>r. Ma<strong>the</strong>matical statistics can notnaturally avoid it, but only shifts <strong>the</strong> choice to magnitudes not be<strong>in</strong>gmeasured <strong>in</strong> reality. No special benefit is seen <strong>in</strong> that procedure.3.8. The problem <strong>of</strong> representativeness <strong>of</strong> samples. To allappearances, this should be frankly attributed to a problem non-formal<strong>in</strong> its very essence, to <strong>the</strong> choice <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial <strong>in</strong>tuitive assumptions.An alternative can be to separate <strong>the</strong> trials <strong>in</strong>to several subsamples <strong>and</strong>only forecast rough averaged characteristics. The size <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>subsamples <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> threshold for discern<strong>in</strong>g should be chosenaccord<strong>in</strong>g to precedents <strong>in</strong> a c<strong>and</strong>id <strong>in</strong>tuitive way <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> measuredmagnitudes. Such an empirical <strong>in</strong>tuitive approach embodies <strong>the</strong>fundamental pr<strong>in</strong>ciple <strong>of</strong> natural science, <strong>the</strong> dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> multiplerepetition <strong>of</strong> experiments <strong>and</strong> a conv<strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>g reproduction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>irresults. See Alimov (1976, 1977, 1978b; 1978a; 1979).4. The Mises Formalizations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Idea <strong>of</strong> Independent TrialsIn § 3.3 we concluded that a clear rule is required for transition fromone <strong>in</strong>itial sequence <strong>of</strong> trials to an ensemble <strong>of</strong> statistically<strong>in</strong>dependent sequences. That rule should somehow reflect <strong>in</strong>tuitiveideas about <strong>in</strong>dependence <strong>of</strong> trials. We may accept Mises’ general ideato consider <strong>the</strong> trials <strong>in</strong>dependent if <strong>the</strong>ir sequence is very irregular <strong>and</strong>difficult to forecast. He called such sequences irregular collectives.From <strong>the</strong> 1920s many authors (Wald, Feller, Church, Reichenbach)had developed various versions <strong>of</strong> formaliz<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> concept <strong>of</strong> suchcollectives. Kolmogorov’s algorithmic notion <strong>of</strong> probability <strong>of</strong> 1963 8also bears relation to this problem although it is apparently only<strong>in</strong>directly l<strong>in</strong>ked with <strong>the</strong> idea <strong>of</strong> forecast<strong>in</strong>g. See <strong>the</strong> pert<strong>in</strong>ent <strong>in</strong>itialbibliography, for example, <strong>in</strong> Knut (1977, vol. 2, chapter 3).4.1. Formalization accord<strong>in</strong>g to Ville [e. g., Shafer & Vovk 2001,pp. 48 – 50] <strong>and</strong> Postnikov (1960).4.2. Formalization accord<strong>in</strong>g to Copel<strong>and</strong>. Postnikov (1960)proved that a sequence is irregular <strong>in</strong> Copel<strong>and</strong>’s sense if <strong>and</strong> only if itis irregular accord<strong>in</strong>g to Ville <strong>and</strong> Postnikov.130
4.3. General remarks on §§ 4.1 <strong>and</strong> 4.2. A sequence irregularaccord<strong>in</strong>g to §§ 4.1 or 4.2 presents a simplest example <strong>of</strong> an <strong>in</strong>tuitive<strong>and</strong> rigorous ma<strong>the</strong>matical model <strong>of</strong> trials which can be called<strong>in</strong>dependent <strong>and</strong> identical (identical s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> distributions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>probabilities for all <strong>the</strong> formed sequences co<strong>in</strong>cide). The idea <strong>of</strong> a poorpredictability <strong>of</strong> one <strong>in</strong>itial sequence is here <strong>in</strong>deed reduced ra<strong>the</strong>rnaturally to dem<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g statistical <strong>in</strong>dependence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ensemble <strong>of</strong>sequences. As a result, <strong>in</strong>dependence <strong>of</strong> trials is treated <strong>in</strong> such amanner that provides a sufficiently clear rule for its quantitativeempirical verification.Thus, after be<strong>in</strong>g clearly formulated, <strong>in</strong>dependence <strong>of</strong> trialsobviously becomes a concept derived from <strong>the</strong> notion <strong>of</strong> statisticalstability, cf. our assumption <strong>in</strong> § 2.10. It follows that <strong>the</strong> postulate <strong>of</strong> §3.6.3 even <strong>in</strong> its most simple clear form is evidently more complexthan <strong>the</strong> postulates <strong>of</strong> §§ 3.6.1 <strong>and</strong> 3.6.2. It can not be <strong>the</strong> assumptionfrom which, at least accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> pattern <strong>of</strong> one series, statisticalstability is deduced.The verification <strong>of</strong> any propositions <strong>of</strong> ma<strong>the</strong>matical statistics willbe <strong>the</strong>refore aimed at verify<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> postulate <strong>of</strong> § 3.6.3 ra<strong>the</strong>r than atmeasur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> sought parameters <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> distributions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>itialmagnitudes. This measurement, for which, as it seems, ma<strong>the</strong>maticalstatistics is <strong>in</strong>deed created, will only constitute a small <strong>and</strong> so to sayprelim<strong>in</strong>ary part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> work to be done.The formulations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> idea <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dependence <strong>of</strong> trials consideredabove are obviously only applicable when <strong>the</strong> n trials are actuallycarried out many times. The alternative to <strong>the</strong> method <strong>of</strong> ma<strong>the</strong>maticalstatistics <strong>the</strong>refore means that <strong>the</strong> postulate <strong>of</strong> § 3.6.3 should be<strong>in</strong>troduced only after <strong>the</strong> sought parameters or <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial distributionitself were reliably measured.4.4. Specification <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> traditional formulations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> limit<strong>the</strong>orems on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> concept <strong>of</strong> an irregular collective. Theauthor <strong>in</strong>terprets <strong>the</strong> Bernoulli <strong>the</strong>orem by apply<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> notion <strong>of</strong> irregularity <strong>of</strong>collectives. One <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> conditions <strong>of</strong> his pert<strong>in</strong>ent <strong>the</strong>orem is <strong>the</strong> existence <strong>of</strong> a limit<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sequence <strong>of</strong> trials, <strong>the</strong> probability accord<strong>in</strong>g to Mises.He notes that his (<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>refore <strong>the</strong> Bernoulli) <strong>the</strong>orem does not claim to justify<strong>the</strong> statistical stability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> frequency which is now one <strong>of</strong> his preconditions. Heconcludes that <strong>the</strong> limit <strong>the</strong>orems (<strong>in</strong> general!) are not actually fundamentalpropositions as it was thought <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial period <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory<strong>of</strong> probability.4.5. An example from classical statistical physics. [Concern<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>work <strong>of</strong> an oscillator be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>rmal equilibrium with a <strong>the</strong>rmostat.]5. ConclusionAn alternative to <strong>the</strong> method <strong>of</strong> ma<strong>the</strong>matical statistics can bedescribed <strong>in</strong> a few words <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g way. In applied research,<strong>and</strong> more precisely beyond fundamental physics, we should as far aspossible absta<strong>in</strong> from <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g stochastic magnitudes not measured<strong>in</strong> real experiments <strong>in</strong> our <strong>in</strong>itial assumptions. The so-called numericalexperiments compare a computer <strong>and</strong> a paper model but not model<strong>and</strong> reality.The objects <strong>of</strong> study <strong>in</strong> economics, sociology <strong>and</strong> even moderntechnology are most <strong>of</strong>ten too complicated <strong>and</strong> unstable forconstruct<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir useful models by issu<strong>in</strong>g from general pr<strong>in</strong>ciples131
- Page 1 and 2:
Studies in the History of Statistic
- Page 3 and 4:
Introduction by CompilerI am presen
- Page 5 and 6:
(Lect. Notes Math., No. 1021, 1983,
- Page 7 and 8:
sufficiently securely that a carefu
- Page 9 and 10:
is energy?) from chapter 4 of Feynm
- Page 11 and 12:
demand to apply transfinite numbers
- Page 13 and 14:
for stating that Ω consists of ele
- Page 15 and 16:
chances to draw a more suitable apa
- Page 17 and 18:
Let the space of elementary events
- Page 19 and 20:
2.3. Independence. When desiring to
- Page 21 and 22:
Eξ = ∑ aipi.Our form of definiti
- Page 23 and 24:
absolutely precisely if the pertine
- Page 25 and 26:
where x is any real number. If dens
- Page 27 and 28:
probability can be coupled with an
- Page 29 and 30:
Nowadays we are sure that no indepe
- Page 31 and 32:
λ = λ(T)with λ(T) being actually
- Page 33 and 34:
(1/B n )(m − A n )instead of the
- Page 35 and 36:
along with ξ. For example, if ξ i
- Page 37 and 38:
µ( − p0) ÷np0 (1 − p0)nhas an
- Page 39 and 40:
distribution of the maximal term |s
- Page 41 and 42:
ξ (ω) + ... + ξ (ω)n1n{ω :|
- Page 43 and 44:
P{max ξ(t) ≥ x} = 0.01, 0 ≤ t
- Page 45 and 46:
1. This example and considerations
- Page 47 and 48:
IIV. N. TutubalinTreatment of Obser
- Page 49 and 50:
structure of statistical methods, d
- Page 51 and 52:
Suppose that we have adopted the pa
- Page 53 and 54:
and the variances are inversely pro
- Page 55 and 56:
It is interesting therefore to see
- Page 57 and 58:
is applied with P(t) being a polyno
- Page 59 and 60:
ut some mathematical tricks describ
- Page 61 and 62:
It is clear therefore that no speci
- Page 63 and 64:
of various groups of machines, and
- Page 65 and 66:
nnA(λ) x sin λ t, B(λ) = x cosλ
- Page 67 and 68:
of the mathematical model of the Br
- Page 69 and 70:
dF(λ) = f (λ) dλ, so that B( t
- Page 71 and 72:
usually very little of them. Indeed
- Page 73 and 74:
This is the celebrated model of aut
- Page 75 and 76:
applications of the theory of stoch
- Page 77 and 78:
achieved by differentiating because
- Page 79 and 80: u(x 1 , x 2 , t 1 , t 2 ) = v(x 1 ,
- Page 81 and 82: Reasoning based on common sense and
- Page 83 and 84: answering that question is extremel
- Page 85 and 86: IIIV. N. TutubalinThe Boundaries of
- Page 87 and 88: periodograms. It occurred that work
- Page 89 and 90: at point x = 1. However, preceding
- Page 91 and 92: He concludes that since the action
- Page 93 and 94: The verification of the truth of a
- Page 95 and 96: In the purely scientific sense this
- Page 97 and 98: ought to learn at once the simple t
- Page 99 and 100: the material world science had inde
- Page 101 and 102: values of (2.1) realized in the n e
- Page 103 and 104: *several dozen. The totality µ ica
- Page 105 and 106: Mendelian laws. It is not sufficien
- Page 107 and 108: example, the problem of the objecti
- Page 109 and 110: a linear function is not restricted
- Page 111 and 112: 258 - 82 - 176 cases or 68.5% of al
- Page 113 and 114: The Framingham investigation indeed
- Page 115 and 116: or, for discrete observations,IT(ω
- Page 117 and 118: What objections can be made? First,
- Page 119 and 120: eliability and queuing are known to
- Page 121 and 122: Kolman E. (1939 Russian), Perversio
- Page 123 and 124: measurement is provided. Recently,
- Page 125 and 126: which means that sooner or later th
- Page 127 and 128: The foundations of the Mises approa
- Page 129: A rather subtle arsenal is develope
- Page 133 and 134: BibliographyAlimov Yu. I. (1976, 19
- Page 135 and 136: processes are now going on in the s
- Page 137 and 138: obtaining a deviation from the theo
- Page 139 and 140: VIOscar SheyninOn the Bernoulli Law