12.07.2015 Views

1 Studies in the History of Statistics and Probability ... - Sheynin, Oscar

1 Studies in the History of Statistics and Probability ... - Sheynin, Oscar

1 Studies in the History of Statistics and Probability ... - Sheynin, Oscar

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> probability <strong>of</strong> failure with time, was formulated.[...]The values <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> frequencies <strong>of</strong> failures comprise a broken l<strong>in</strong>e.Their scatter <strong>in</strong>creases with t, a circumstance connected with a sharpdecrease <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> area <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>sulation, i. e., <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> experimentalmaterial.We are <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> values <strong>of</strong> probabilities p(t) <strong>of</strong> a failure <strong>of</strong> aunit area <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>sulation aged t dur<strong>in</strong>g unit time (10 4 work<strong>in</strong>g hours,about 1.5 years). For small values <strong>of</strong> t <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> experimentalmaterial is large, but p(t) <strong>the</strong>mselves are low, 0.01 – 0.02, so that <strong>the</strong>irdirect determ<strong>in</strong>ation through frequencies is fraught with very largeerrors. The mean square deviation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> frequency, µ i /S i , where µ i is<strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> failures dur<strong>in</strong>g time <strong>in</strong>terval between (i – 1)-th <strong>and</strong> i-thtime units <strong>and</strong> S i , <strong>the</strong> correspond<strong>in</strong>g area <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>sulation, is known to beequal top( ti)[1 − p( ti)]Siwhere t i =10 4 i hours. For t 1 = 10 5 p(t i ) ≈ 0.02, S i = 200, so thatdeviation is roughly 0.01 or 50% <strong>of</strong> p(t) itself.Then it is natural to attempt to heighten <strong>the</strong> precision <strong>of</strong> determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gp(t) by smooth<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> estimation <strong>of</strong> this probability <strong>the</strong>n dependson all o<strong>the</strong>r experimental data. But <strong>the</strong>n, a statistical model isnecessary here. It is ra<strong>the</strong>r natural to consider <strong>the</strong> observed number <strong>of</strong>failures (1.2) as r<strong>and</strong>om variables with a Poisson distribution.Underst<strong>and</strong>ably,Eµ i = S i p(t i ).It is somewhat more difficult to agree that <strong>the</strong> magnitudes µ i are<strong>in</strong>dependent. Here, however, <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g considerations applicableto any rare events will help. Take for example µ 1 , µ 2 . Failure occurr<strong>in</strong>gdur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> first <strong>in</strong>terval <strong>of</strong> time <strong>in</strong>fluences <strong>the</strong> behaviour <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><strong>in</strong>sulation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> second <strong>in</strong>terval, but that action is only restricted to <strong>the</strong>failed mach<strong>in</strong>es whose portion was small. Hav<strong>in</strong>g admitted<strong>in</strong>dependence, <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>the</strong>matical model is completely given although itis connected not with <strong>the</strong> most convenient normal, but with <strong>the</strong>Poisson distribution. Then, <strong>the</strong> variancesvar µ i = Eµ i = S i p(t i )depend on probabilities p(t i ) which we <strong>in</strong>deed aim to derive. Atransformation to magnitudesv = 2 µ(2.1)iiessentially equalizes <strong>the</strong> variances <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>refore helps.These magnitudes v 1 , v 2 , ..., v n from which we later return tomagnitudes (1.2) are smoo<strong>the</strong>d. The smooth<strong>in</strong>g itself is easy <strong>in</strong> essence58

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!