Annexure to Auditors’ ReportAnnexure referred to in paragraph 3 of <strong>the</strong> report of even date of <strong>the</strong> auditors to <strong>the</strong> membersof TIL LIMITED on <strong>the</strong> financial statements for <strong>the</strong> year ended 31st March, 20091. (a) The Company has maintained proper records to show fullparticulars including quantitative details and situation offixed assets.(b) The fixed assets of <strong>the</strong> Company are physically verifiedby <strong>the</strong> management according to a phased programmedesigned to cover all <strong>the</strong> items over a period of three years,which in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to <strong>the</strong> sizeof <strong>the</strong> Company and <strong>the</strong> nature of its assets. Pursuant to <strong>the</strong>programme, a part of <strong>the</strong> fixed assets has been physicallyverified by <strong>the</strong> management during <strong>the</strong> year and no materialdiscrepancies between <strong>the</strong> book records and <strong>the</strong> physicalinventory have been noticed.(c) In our opinion, and according to <strong>the</strong> information andexplanations given to us, a substantial part of fixed assetshas not been disposed off by <strong>the</strong> Company during <strong>the</strong> year.2. (a) The inventory of <strong>the</strong> Company (o<strong>the</strong>r than stocks with thirdparties) has been physically verified by <strong>the</strong> managementduring <strong>the</strong> year. In respect of inventory lying with thirdparties, <strong>the</strong>se have substantially been confirmed by <strong>the</strong>m.In our opinion <strong>the</strong> frequency of verification is reasonable.(b) In our opinion, <strong>the</strong> procedures of physical verification ofinventory followed by <strong>the</strong> management are reasonable andadequate in relation to <strong>the</strong> size of <strong>the</strong> Company and natureof its business.(c) On <strong>the</strong> basis of our examination of <strong>the</strong> inventory records, inour opinion, <strong>the</strong> Company has maintained proper records ofinventory. The discrepancies noticed on physical verificationof inventory as compared to book records, which were notmaterial, have been properly dealt with in <strong>the</strong> books ofaccount.3. The Company has nei<strong>the</strong>r granted nor taken any loans, securedor unsecured, to/from companies, firms or o<strong>the</strong>r parties coveredin <strong>the</strong> register maintained under Section 301 of <strong>the</strong> Act.4. In our opinion and according to <strong>the</strong> information and explanationsgiven to us, having regard to <strong>the</strong> explanation that certain itemspurchased are of special nature for which suitable alternativesources do not exist for obtaining comparative quotations, <strong>the</strong>reis an adequate internal control system commensurate with<strong>the</strong> size of <strong>the</strong> Company and <strong>the</strong> nature of its business, for <strong>the</strong>purchase of inventory, fixed assets and for <strong>the</strong> sale of goods andservices. Fur<strong>the</strong>r, on <strong>the</strong> basis of our examination of <strong>the</strong> booksand records of <strong>the</strong> Company, and according to <strong>the</strong> informationand explanations given to us, we have nei<strong>the</strong>r come across norhave been informed of any continuing failure to correct majorweaknesses in <strong>the</strong> aforesaid internal control system.5. According to <strong>the</strong> information and explanations given to us, <strong>the</strong>rehave been no contracts or arrangements during <strong>the</strong> year referredto in Section 301 of <strong>the</strong> Act, <strong>the</strong> particulars of which are requiredto be entered in <strong>the</strong> register maintained under that Section.Fur<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong>re have been no transactions made in pursuance ofsuch contracts and exceeding <strong>the</strong> value of rupees five lacs inrespect of any party during <strong>the</strong> year.6. In our opinion and according to <strong>the</strong> information and explanationsgiven to us, <strong>the</strong> Company has complied with <strong>the</strong> provisionsof Sections 58A and 58AA or any o<strong>the</strong>r relevant provisions of<strong>the</strong> Act and <strong>the</strong> Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules,1975, as applicable, with regard to deposits accepted from <strong>the</strong>public. According to <strong>the</strong> information and explanations given tous, no order under <strong>the</strong> aforesaid sections has been passed by<strong>the</strong> Company Law Board or National Company Law Tribunal orReserve Bank of India or any Court or any o<strong>the</strong>r Tribunal on <strong>the</strong>Company in respect of <strong>the</strong> aforesaid deposits.7. In our opinion, <strong>the</strong> Company’s present internal audit system ( firmof chartered accountants has been appointed for <strong>the</strong> purpose)as conducted in a phased manner is commensurate with its sizeand nature of business.8. The Central Government of India has not prescribed <strong>the</strong>maintenance of cost records under clause (d) of sub-section(1) of Section 209 of <strong>the</strong> Act, for any of <strong>the</strong> products of <strong>the</strong>Company.9 (a) According to <strong>the</strong> information and explanations given to usand records of <strong>the</strong> Company examined by us, in our opinion,<strong>the</strong> Company is regular in depositing during <strong>the</strong> year <strong>the</strong>undisputed statutory dues including Provident Fund, InvestorEducation and Protection Fund, Employees’ State Insurance,Income Tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, CustomsDuty, Excise Duty, Cess and o<strong>the</strong>r material statutory dues,as applicable, with <strong>the</strong> appropriate authorities.(b) According to <strong>the</strong> information and explanations given to usand <strong>the</strong> records of <strong>the</strong> Company examined by us, as at 31stMarch, 2009, <strong>the</strong>re were no dues in respect of CustomsDuty, Wealth Tax and Cess which have not been depositedon account of dispute o<strong>the</strong>r than certain disputed duesof Income Tax, Sales Tax, Service Tax and Excise Duty inrespect of which amounts involved and <strong>the</strong> forum at whichdispute is pending are set out below:Name of <strong>the</strong>StatuteThe Central SalesTax Act, 1956The Uttar PradeshTrade Tax Act,1948Nature ofDuesSales Tax dues for<strong>the</strong> year 2003-04.Entry Tax duesfor <strong>the</strong>financial year2004-05.Amount(Rs. in lacs)[net ofpayments]9.866.42Forum where disputeis pendingThe JointCommissioner(Appeals), Ghaziabad,Uttar Pradesh.The JointCommissioner(Appeals), Ghaziabad,Uttar Pradesh.
052053Name of <strong>the</strong>StatuteThe Central SalesTax Act, 1956Nature ofDuesSales Tax duesfor <strong>the</strong>year 2004-05.Amount(Rs. in lacs)[net ofpayments]11.80Forum where disputeis pendingThe JointCommissioner(Appeals), Ghaziabad,Uttar Pradesh.basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures ando<strong>the</strong>r securities.13. Provisions of any special statute applicable to chit fund / nidhi/ mutual benefit fund / societies are not applicable to <strong>the</strong>Company.14. In our opinion, <strong>the</strong> Company is not a dealer or trader in shares,securities, debentures and o<strong>the</strong>r investments.15. In our opinion, and according to <strong>the</strong> information and explanationsgiven to us, <strong>the</strong> terms and conditions of <strong>the</strong> guarantees given by<strong>the</strong> Company, for loans taken by o<strong>the</strong>rs from banks or financialinstitutions, are not prejudicial to <strong>the</strong> interest of <strong>the</strong> Company.16. In our opinion, and according to <strong>the</strong> information and explanationsgiven to us, <strong>the</strong> term loans have been applied for <strong>the</strong> purposesfor which <strong>the</strong>y were obtained.17. On <strong>the</strong> basis of an overall examination of <strong>the</strong> Balance Sheet of<strong>the</strong> Company, in our opinion and according to <strong>the</strong> informationand explanations given to us, <strong>the</strong>re are no funds raised on shortterm basis which have been used for long term investment.18. The Company has not made any preferential allotment of sharesto parties and companies covered in <strong>the</strong> register maintainedunder Section 301 of <strong>the</strong> Act during <strong>the</strong> year.19. The Company had nei<strong>the</strong>r any outstanding debenture at <strong>the</strong>beginning of <strong>the</strong> year nor has it issued any debenture during<strong>the</strong> year and accordingly, <strong>the</strong> question of creation of security orcharges in this respect does not arise.20. The Company has not recently raised any money by publicissue.21. During <strong>the</strong> course of our examination of <strong>the</strong> books and recordsof <strong>the</strong> Company, carried out in accordance with <strong>the</strong> generallyaccepted auditing practices in India, and according to <strong>the</strong>information and explanations given to us, we have nei<strong>the</strong>r comeacross any instance of fraud on or by <strong>the</strong> Company, noticed orreported during <strong>the</strong> year, nor have we been informed of suchcase by <strong>the</strong> management.Financial Statements (TIL)The Uttar PradeshValue Added TaxAct, 2008The Income taxAct, 1961The Income taxAct, 1961The Central ExciseAct, 1944The Central ExciseAct, 1944Entry Tax dues for<strong>the</strong> financial year2008-09.Income taxdues for <strong>the</strong>assessment year2004-05Income taxdues for <strong>the</strong>assessment year2006-07Excise valuationdisputes for <strong>the</strong>financial year2002-03.Clearance ofExcise exemptedgoods in <strong>the</strong>financial year2003-04.12.3810.0010.2818.5766.50The JointCommissioner(Appeals) / TheDeputy Commissioner(Appeals), Ghaziabad,Uttar Pradesh.Commissioner ofIncome-tax (Appeals)Commissioner ofIncome-tax (Appeals).Customs, Excise andService Tax AppellateTribunal, Chennai.Customs, Excise andService Tax AppellateTribunal, Kolkata.The Central ExciseAct, 1944Finance Act, 1994Dispute regardingduty exemptioncertificateproduced by acustomer.Service Tax duesfor <strong>the</strong> periodAugust 2004 toJuly 20079.54 Commissioner(Appeals) Kolkata104.42Customs, Excise andService Tax AppellateTribunal, New Delhi.Finance Act, 1994Service Tax duesfor <strong>the</strong> periodOctober 2006 toJanuary 20086.60The Commisioner ofCentral Excise, Jaipur.10. The Company has no accumulated losses as at 31st March,2009, and it has not incurred any cash losses in <strong>the</strong> financialyear ended on that date or in <strong>the</strong> immediately preceding financialyear.11. According to <strong>the</strong> records of <strong>the</strong> Company examined by us and<strong>the</strong> information and explanations given to us, <strong>the</strong> Company hasnot defaulted in repayment of dues to any financial institution orbank or debenture holders as at <strong>the</strong> Balance Sheet date.12. The Company has not granted any loans and advances on <strong>the</strong>Place : KolkataDate : 11th May, 2009.S.K.DebPartnerMembership Number – 13390For and on behalf ofPrice WaterhouseChartered Accountants