13.07.2015 Views

Landslides in the Sydney Basin - Geoscience Australia

Landslides in the Sydney Basin - Geoscience Australia

Landslides in the Sydney Basin - Geoscience Australia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Seismic Hazard <strong>in</strong> <strong>Sydney</strong>Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of <strong>the</strong> one day workshoppossible overlap with recorded seismic events (Table 1) <strong>in</strong> 1973, 1976 and 1979, but not for <strong>the</strong> late1965, December 1983 and early 1984 failures. Additionally, <strong>the</strong> Burragorang earthquake showedthat moderate earthquakes can impact on structures tens of kilometres away, which suggests thatslopes at or close to <strong>the</strong> angle of stability <strong>in</strong> neighbour<strong>in</strong>g valleys might be affected. Therefore, weconclude that seismicity has been recorded with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> areas where landslides occur, but we cannei<strong>the</strong>r confirm nor rule out a seismic l<strong>in</strong>k at this stage.Figure 3: Seismic events recorded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Sydney</strong> Bas<strong>in</strong> s<strong>in</strong>ce 1872. <strong>Landslides</strong> <strong>in</strong>dicated as C –Carne, B – Bimlow, L – Lacys, T – Tumbledown, N – North Nattai (Source: <strong>Geoscience</strong> <strong>Australia</strong>Earthquake Database http://www.ga.gov.au/oracle/quake/quake_onl<strong>in</strong>e.jsp)The magnitude of earthquakes may be a key factor <strong>in</strong> determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g if a landslide is triggered along<strong>the</strong> steep sides of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>cised valleys <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Blue Mounta<strong>in</strong>s Plateau. Reynolds (1976) reports that amagnitude 5.5 earthquake is not likely to fracture hard rock at <strong>the</strong> surface or with<strong>in</strong> 1 km of <strong>the</strong>epicentre, whereas a magnitude 6.5 earthquake is very likely to fracture hard rock at <strong>the</strong> surface. Thestrong jo<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g pattern<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Triassic sandstones suggests that <strong>the</strong> vertical cliff l<strong>in</strong>es couldfracture and fail under a magnitude 6.5 earthquake or greater. Based on early records, Drake (1976)estimates that <strong>the</strong> return <strong>in</strong>terval of a magnitude 5.5 earthquake <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> south-west <strong>Sydney</strong> Bas<strong>in</strong> isapproximately 30 years, whilst <strong>the</strong> return <strong>in</strong>terval of a magnitude 6.5 earthquake is approximately300 years. More recent analysis of earthquake magnitude recurrence by Berryman and Stirl<strong>in</strong>g(2003) for <strong>the</strong> western <strong>Sydney</strong> Bas<strong>in</strong>, which <strong>in</strong>cludes <strong>the</strong> LSC and Blue Mounta<strong>in</strong>s Plateau, <strong>in</strong>dicatesslightly longer return <strong>in</strong>tervals. For example, a magnitude 6 earthquake is predicted to have a returnof around 1,000 years and earthquakes of magnitude 7 to 7.5 may have return <strong>in</strong>tervals of 10 – 25kyr. Us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Tumbledown and Carne <strong>Landslides</strong> as <strong>in</strong>dicators of <strong>the</strong> volume of rock that could beremoved by landslides from <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>cised Nattai valley, <strong>the</strong> estimated return period of a 1.5 M m 3104

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!