13.07.2015 Views

Contents - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

Contents - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

Contents - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 4ImaginationI. Images and ImaginationsIn 1814, having spent the previous seven years in something <strong>of</strong> a state <strong>of</strong> exile from his publicduties as a Poet, Wordsworth published <strong>The</strong> Excursion, which was announced as being the second part<strong>of</strong> his projected magnum opus, ‘<strong>The</strong> Recluse’. 1 <strong>The</strong> work was prefaced by a dedication to LordLonsdale, some brief introductory remarks referring to the genesis <strong>of</strong> the poem, and an inspiringProspectus describing Wordsworth’s subject matter: ‘On Man, on Nature, and on Human Life’. God,conceived <strong>of</strong> in Christian terms as a transcendent deity, is not mentioned, and although ‘Jehovah’ isnamed, he is bypassed ‘unalarmed’ as the poet, rather irreverently, announces that his subject matter iseven more awe-full; it concerns what takes place within the ‘Mind <strong>of</strong> Man / My haunt and main region<strong>of</strong> my song’ (PW V 4). 2<strong>The</strong> lines comprising the Prospectus were written some fourteen years earlier, and presentideas that inspired Wordsworth at a time when he was also defining his theory <strong>of</strong> poetry. Some <strong>of</strong> themore pious readers <strong>of</strong> <strong>The</strong> Excursion would have considered his remarks in the Prospectus to be atodds with the Christian sentiments expressed by the Pastor at the close <strong>of</strong> the poem. And Wordsworthwas questioned, at the time, as to whether or not the poem suggested the worship <strong>of</strong> Nature, ratherthan God. Around the time the lines were originally written Wordsworth would still have beendescribed as a ‘semi-Atheist’ by Coleridge, and held strong sympathies for ‘pagan’ ideas aboutreligion that were in conflict with Coleridge’s explicit Christian beliefs. Where Coleridge looked toAugustine, who saw everything as pre-ordained by God, Wordsworth was more Celtic in hisChristianity. Like the Cambrian theologian Pelagius – who Augustine accused <strong>of</strong> defining aChristianity that was no more than an extension <strong>of</strong> Celtic druidism – Wordsworth believed that humanbeings also had moral responsibility for their own actions because ‘God’ had given them free-will. 3Coleridge, who was notoriously lacking in will, found Augustine’s notion <strong>of</strong> salvation for truebelievers a more promising means <strong>of</strong> saving his own soul.Pelagius’ belief that there was something <strong>of</strong> a struggle between the grace <strong>of</strong> God and the will<strong>of</strong> his people (the Pelagian heresy), lay at the heart <strong>of</strong> Celtic Christianity, and Wordsworth’sChristianity, when he later accepted the need for the state religion (the Anglican Church) to direct themores <strong>of</strong> the British people, remained more Pelagian than Augustinian. Standing in his churchyard inthe mountains Wordsworth would have believed that God’s grace was to be seen in all aspects <strong>of</strong> the1 In the wake <strong>of</strong> Francis Jeffrey’s attacks on Poems in Two Volumes, Wordsworth refrained from publishing anymore poetry until he had completed <strong>The</strong> Excursion.2 Meyer Abrams made his interpretation <strong>of</strong> the argument <strong>of</strong> Prospectus central to his thesis about Wordsworth’sRomantic identity in Natural Supernaturalism.3 For a brief discussion <strong>of</strong> Pelagius, see ‘<strong>The</strong> Pelagian Controversy’ in Bertrand Russell, <strong>The</strong> History <strong>of</strong> WesternPhilosophy, pp. 383-5.94

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!