13.07.2015 Views

Contents - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

Contents - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

Contents - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Wordsworth’s ‘history’ <strong>of</strong> his life in <strong>The</strong> Prelude is certainly not one setting out to describe‘what actually happened’, as Legouis had thought. <strong>The</strong> Prelude, as a poem, <strong>of</strong>fers a ‘Fained Historie’rather than a ‘true historie’; a distinction made by Bacon in his Advancement <strong>of</strong> Knowledge. Inaddition to poetic licence, Wordsworth ‘invents’ various ‘arguments’ to express particular opinionsand to emphasise the allegory he was concerned to construct. As historiographers have alwaysstressed, ‘what actually happened’, as a ‘historical record’, is always coloured by the character <strong>of</strong> theperson narrating the history. Edmund Burke’s appreciation <strong>of</strong> the way things were in England in theearly 1790s was very different to William Godwin’s - as the history <strong>of</strong> Caleb Williams, or <strong>The</strong> WayThings Are, dramatically reveals. <strong>The</strong> course <strong>of</strong> Wordsworth’s narrative in <strong>The</strong> Prelude is predeterminedby the moral tale that he is concerned to relate to Coleridge, in which his daemonic,youthful, prophetic over-imaginative genius is ‘s<strong>of</strong>tened down’ and humanised through his necessaryengagement with the world <strong>of</strong> men and history.As Alan Liu has noted, Wordsworth’s ‘sense <strong>of</strong> history’ was strongly coloured by his readingin the ancient historians, whose works he is known to have read with interest, and which herecommended as worthy <strong>of</strong> serious study to Mrs Clarkson in 1805. 9 Plutarch’s Lives, for instance,focussed far more on details about the characters who made history than on events per se. 10 <strong>The</strong>introduction to ‘Dryden’s’ translation records that: ‘it is not primarily as a historian <strong>of</strong> cities thatPlutarch writes, but as a biographer and a moralist. To see in his characters “duty performed andrewarded; arrogance chastised; hasty anger corrected” and above all virtue triumphant, such are hisinterests’. 11 Wordsworth’s own ‘history’ is a history <strong>of</strong> the development <strong>of</strong> his new character as ‘aman speaking to men’ and was ‘designed’ (Prelude XIII 412) with another character, Coleridge, inmind. <strong>The</strong> history Wordsworth writes in <strong>The</strong> Prelude is about the growth <strong>of</strong> his character, it is arepresentation <strong>of</strong> his ethos, and should not be read as a reliable catalogue <strong>of</strong> historical events.However much those events shaped his mind, they are also made to fit the concerns <strong>of</strong> the moralhistory, and the moral argument that he constructed and addressed to Coleridge. Wordsworth readhistory as Plutarch did. In his Parallel Lives Plutarch aimed to reveal his subject’s character, andthereby improve his reader’s character. His biographies had a moralising function, as did <strong>The</strong> Prelude,9 In reply to a request from Mrs Clarkson, Dorothy replies ‘William scarcely knows what books to recommendto you but you cannot go wrong, he says, if you read the best old writers – Lord Bacon’s Essays, hisAdvancement <strong>of</strong> Learning &c., for instance, and if you are fond <strong>of</strong> History read it in the old memoirs or oldChronicles’ (EY 662).10 In his essay, ‘<strong>The</strong> Lake Poets: William Wordsworth.’ Thomas De Quincey recorded that Plutarch’s Lives wasWordsworth’s favourite book (excepting books <strong>of</strong> poetry). He also noted that Wordsworth was aware <strong>of</strong> ‘theinaccuracy and want <strong>of</strong> authentic weight attaching to Plutarch as a historian: but his business with Plutarchwas not for purposes <strong>of</strong> research: he was satisfied with his fine moral effects. De Quincey, CollectedWritings. Ed. Mason. II. 288. Given Wordsworth’s early interest in Rousseau, it is also worth noting thatRousseau had written that ‘Plutarch, above all was my favourite author’. (Confessions Book 1). In his FourLetters to M. de Malesherbes he related how he had got his hands on Plutarch at the age <strong>of</strong> six, and knew himby heart at the age <strong>of</strong> eight, having read all his ‘novels’ (i.e. his Lives <strong>of</strong> Illustrious Men). He related that hisreading caused him to ‘shed buckets <strong>of</strong> tears...From that reading, my heart acquired this heroic and romanticbent which has done nothing but increase until now and which has made me completely disgusted witheverything, except that which resembles my fantasies’.For these references see C.E. Butterworth’s notes to <strong>The</strong> Reveries <strong>of</strong> a Solitary Walker p 59.11 Plutarch’s Parallel Lives, <strong>The</strong> Translation called Dryden’s, 5 vols. I. xxviii.146

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!