13.07.2015 Views

Contents - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

Contents - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

Contents - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

more progressive and ‘enlightened’ teachings <strong>of</strong> Paley were the fashion. 7 Coleridge shows that he hasa general knowledge <strong>of</strong> Cicero’s philosophical works in his discussions <strong>of</strong> philosophy, and it wouldseem that he had been engaged in discussion with Wordsworth about Stoic philosophy by 1802,something I discuss below; but he was not sympathetic to Stoicism. 8II. A Sense SublimeIt is a curious fact <strong>of</strong> canonical Wordsworth studies, that the strong Stoic sentimentsexpressed in ‘Lines Written Above Tintern Abbey’ have been largely ignored by Romantic criticism,even though the lines in the central section <strong>of</strong> the poem that describe Wordsworth’s Stoic faith are<strong>of</strong>ten cited by writers on Stoicism for the transparency <strong>of</strong> the Stoic concepts they express. <strong>The</strong> ‘poemon the Wye’ has <strong>of</strong>ten been read as evidence <strong>of</strong> Wordsworth’s pantheism – the idea that everything isGod, and God is everything, and Coleridge is seen to have provided him with his concepts. Butpantheism is too loose a term to describe Wordsworth’s actual belief in nature, which is perhaps betterdescribed as panentheism: God is in everything and everything is in God. 9 I define Wordsworth’sspecific relationship to ‘Nature’ at this time, as that <strong>of</strong> a Stoic philosopher, a novitiate Stoic sage,rather than as a ‘son <strong>of</strong> Rousseau’, or as a worshipper <strong>of</strong> ‘rocks and stones and trees’, or as a follower<strong>of</strong> Burke and ‘Burkean’ notions <strong>of</strong> ‘second nature’. In remaining focussed on the ‘natural man’ I donot deny the ‘spiritual’ in man, but I understand the pneuma, as Wordsworth did - as an integral part<strong>of</strong> the natural world. This is a ‘one life’ theory that Wordsworth discovered in Stoic philosophy, ratherthan in his discussions with Coleridge. Here I differ from established opinion that, whileacknowledging Wordsworth’s adoption <strong>of</strong> a Stoic attitude <strong>of</strong> mind around 1804, does not generallyrecognise his knowledge <strong>of</strong> early Stoic philosophy in the late 1790s.‘Lines Written a few miles above Tintern Abbey, on revisiting the banks <strong>of</strong> the Wye during atour, July 13 1798’ was composed some four months after Ms B <strong>of</strong> ‘<strong>The</strong> Ruined Cottage’. It presents adeclaration <strong>of</strong> faith in Nature, as well as a declaration <strong>of</strong> love for Humanity and Dorothy. <strong>The</strong> centralsection that acknowledges the change in Wordsworth’s ethos, signals a transition from an earlier state<strong>of</strong> mind as an enthusiast <strong>of</strong> nature, addicted to the ‘aching joys’ and ‘dizzy raptures’ found in ‘nature’which, at that earlier time, was considered to be ‘all in all’. In order to satisfy his ‘appetite’ for herpleasures then, Wordsworth would follow ‘Wherever nature led’. But now, ‘That time is past’, and theloss <strong>of</strong> those pleasures has been replaced by ‘Abundant recompense’. This compensation is describedin a carefully constructed enthymematic ‘argument’ [1] ‘For I have learned /To look on nature, not as7 Robert Southey, Thomas De Quincey and John Wilson had all studied at Oxford. Southey became an earlyconvert to Stoic thought; possibly this contributed to his intolerance <strong>of</strong> Coleridge’s lack <strong>of</strong> will. He found thework <strong>of</strong> Epictetus, in particular, his guide to stoicism.8 Coleridge had made a point <strong>of</strong> attacking Godwin - whom he demonised for his Stoic attitude <strong>of</strong> mind - at theend <strong>of</strong> his third ‘Lecture on Revealed Religion’ in Bristol in 1795. Coleridge’s rhetoric implies Godwin’sphilosophy to be the work <strong>of</strong> Satan, and opposes it in the name <strong>of</strong> Christ.9 For an important study <strong>of</strong> Coleridge’s concerns with pantheism, in a book that might be read as supplementingmy representation <strong>of</strong> Wordsworth’s reasoning by providing a better understanding <strong>of</strong> Coleridge’s concerns,see Richard Berkeley, Coleridge and the Crisis <strong>of</strong> Reason.75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!