Good Health Can’t Wait.
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Good</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Can’t</strong> <strong>Wait</strong>.<br />
Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Limited<br />
BOARD OF DIRECTORS<br />
AND KEY MANAGEMENT<br />
PERSONNEL<br />
As per the provisions of Sections 149<br />
and 152 of the Companies Act, 2013,<br />
the shareholders at their 30th Annual<br />
General Meeting held on 31 July 2014,<br />
had approved the re-appointment of<br />
all the existing Independent Directors<br />
of the Company for tenure of up to<br />
five consecutive years. None of the<br />
Independent Directors are liable to retire<br />
by rotation.<br />
In accordance with Section 149(7)<br />
of the Companies Act, 2013, each<br />
Independent Director has confirmed<br />
to the Company that he or she meets<br />
the criteria of independence laid down<br />
in Section 149(6) of the Companies<br />
Act, 2013 and Clause 49 of the Listing<br />
Agreement.<br />
Further, in accordance with provisions of<br />
Section 152 of the Companies Act, 2013,<br />
the shareholders had also approved the<br />
variation in the terms of appointment<br />
of Mr. G V Prasad and Mr. Satish Reddy,<br />
Whole-time Directors, making them<br />
liable to retire by rotation.<br />
Accordingly, Mr. G V Prasad, Wholetime<br />
Director, retires by rotation at the<br />
forthcoming 31 st Annual General Meeting<br />
scheduled on 31 July 2015 and being<br />
eligible, seeks re-appointment. A brief<br />
profile of Mr. G V Prasad is given in<br />
the Corporate Governance section of<br />
the annual report for reference of the<br />
shareholders.<br />
BOARD EVALUATION<br />
As per provisions of the Companies<br />
Act, 2013 and Clause 49 of the Listing<br />
Agreement, an evaluation of the<br />
performance of the Board and members<br />
was undertaken. In order to ensure<br />
objectivity, an independent expert was<br />
engaged to manage the process. The<br />
contribution and impact of individual<br />
Directors were reviewed through a peer<br />
evaluation on parameters such as level<br />
of engagement and participation, flow of<br />
information, independence of judgment,<br />
conflicts resolution and their contribution<br />
in enhancing the Board’s overall<br />
effectiveness. A 360 degree feedbackcum-assessment<br />
of individual directors,<br />
the Board as a whole and its committees<br />
was conducted. The feedback obtained<br />
from the interventions was discussed in<br />
detail and, where required, independent<br />
and collective action points for<br />
improvement put in place.<br />
APPOINTMENT OF DIRECTORS AND<br />
REMUNERATION POLICY<br />
The assessment and appointment of<br />
members to the Board is based on a<br />
combination of criterion that includes<br />
ethics, personal and professional stature,<br />
domain expertise, gender diversity<br />
and specific qualification required<br />
for the position. The potential Board<br />
member is also assessed on the basis of<br />
independence criteria defined in Section<br />
149(6) of the Companies Act, 2013 and<br />
Clause 49 of the Listing Agreement.<br />
In accordance with Section 178(3) of<br />
the Companies Act, 2013, Clause 49(IV)<br />
(B) of the Listing Agreement and on<br />
recommendations of the Nomination,<br />
Governance & Compensation<br />
Committee, the Board adopted a<br />
remuneration policy for Directors, Key<br />
Management Personnel (KMPs) and<br />
Senior Management. The policy is<br />
attached as an annexure to the Corporate<br />
Governance report.<br />
NUMBER OF BOARD MEETINGS<br />
The Board of Directors met four times<br />
during the year. In addition, an Annual<br />
Board Retreat was held to discuss<br />
strategic matters. Details of Board<br />
meetings are laid out in Corporate<br />
Governance report, which forms a part of<br />
this annual report.<br />
AUDIT COMMITTEE<br />
The Audit Committee of the Board<br />
of Directors consists entirely of<br />
Independent Directors. Presently, the<br />
Committee comprises of Mr. Sridar<br />
Iyengar (Chairman), Mr. Ravi<br />
Bhoothalingam, Ms. Kalpana Morparia<br />
and Dr. Omkar Goswami.<br />
The Board has accepted all<br />
recommendations made by the Audit<br />
Committee during the year.<br />
BUSINESS RISK MANAGEMENT<br />
The Company has a Risk Management<br />
Committee of the Board, consisting<br />
entirely of Independent Directors. The<br />
details of the Committee and its terms<br />
of reference are set out in the Corporate<br />
Governance section, which forms a part<br />
of the Board’s report.<br />
The Audit and Risk Management<br />
Committees review the key elements<br />
of the Company’s business, finance,<br />
operations and compliance risk(s) and<br />
respective mitigation strategies. The<br />
Risk Management Committee reviews<br />
key strategic, business and operational<br />
risks, while issues around Ethics & Fraud,<br />
Internal Control over Financial Reporting<br />
(ICOFR), as well as Process risks and their<br />
mitigation are reviewed by the Audit<br />
Committee.<br />
The Company has a management<br />
level committee – ‘Finance Investment<br />
and Risk Management Council’ (FIRM<br />
Council) which operates under a<br />
charter and focusses on risks associated<br />
with the Company’s business and<br />
investments. The FIRM Council and/or<br />
the management, periodically reviews<br />
specific policies or charters for Fraud Risk<br />
Management, Compliance and Internal<br />
Audit.<br />
The Enterprise-wide Risk Management<br />
(ERM) function helps the management<br />
and the Board to periodically prioritize,<br />
review and measure risks against a<br />
pre-determined risk appetite and<br />
to suitably respond, depending on<br />
whether the risks are internal, strategic or<br />
external. Significant risks are prioritized<br />
on likelihood and severity, and their<br />
mitigation is reviewed regularly.<br />
During FY2015, focus areas of the<br />
management and the Board included<br />
progress on strategy execution, quality<br />
and regulatory, geo-political, compliance<br />
and patent infringement risk exposures,<br />
while process safety and health<br />
continued to remain a priority for the<br />
Company.<br />
ADEQUACY OF INTERNAL<br />
FINANCIAL CONTROL SYSTEMS<br />
The Company has in place adequate<br />
internal financial controls with reference<br />
to financial statements. These controls<br />
ensure the accuracy and completeness of<br />
the accounting records and preparation<br />
of reliable financial statements.<br />
DIRECTORS’ RESPONSIBILITY<br />
STATEMENT<br />
In terms of Section 134(5) of the<br />
Companies Act, 2013, your Directors<br />
state that:<br />
1. applicable accounting standards<br />
have been followed in the<br />
preparation of the annual accounts;<br />
86