Good Health Can’t Wait.
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Statutory Reports • Board’s Report<br />
Annual Report 2014 - 15<br />
EMPLOYEES STOCK OPTION SCHEMES<br />
SL.<br />
NO.<br />
DESCRIPTION<br />
11 Diluted Earnings Per Share (EPS)<br />
pursuant to issue of shares on exercise<br />
of option calculated in accordance with<br />
Accounting Standard (AS) 20 ‘Earnings<br />
Per Share’<br />
DR. REDDY’S EMPLOYEES STOCK OPTION<br />
SCHEME, 2002<br />
DETAILS<br />
` 98.18<br />
DR. REDDY’S EMPLOYEES ADR STOCK OPTION<br />
SCHEME, 2007<br />
12 The difference between the employee<br />
compensation cost computed under<br />
Intrinsic Value Method and the employee<br />
compensation cost that shall have been<br />
recognized if the<br />
Company had used the Fair Value<br />
Methods and its impact on profits and on<br />
EPS of the Company<br />
The employee Compensation Cost on account of ESOP in the financial year 2014-15 based on Intrinsic Value<br />
Method is ` 519 million. Had the Company used the Fair Value Method, the ESOP cost in the financial year<br />
would have been ` 498 million, which would have a consequential impact on profit.<br />
However, there would not have been any significant adverse effect on the Profit and EPS, on using fair value<br />
method of accounting.<br />
13 Weighted-average exercise prices and<br />
weighted-average fair values of options<br />
for options whose exercise price either<br />
equals or exceeds or is less than the<br />
market price of the stock<br />
Weighted average exercise price and weighted average fair value of the outstanding Fair Market Value<br />
options as on 31 March 2015 was ` Nil.<br />
Weighted average exercise price and weighted average fair value of the outstanding Par Value options as on<br />
31 March 2015 was ` 5 and ` 1,980 respectively.<br />
14 Description of the method and<br />
significant assumptions used during the<br />
year to estimate the fair values<br />
of options:<br />
(i) Risk-free interest rate 8.35% - 8.57%<br />
(ii) Expected life 12 months to 48 months<br />
(iii) Expected volatility 21.17% - 26.44%<br />
(iv) Expected dividends 0.67% - 0.78%<br />
(v)<br />
The price of the underlying share in<br />
market at the time of option grant<br />
The Company has opted Intrinsic Value Method for accounting of Compensation Cost arising out of ESOP.<br />
However for disclosures in para 12 above the following assumptions have been used:<br />
` 2,360.18<br />
* Dr. R. Ananthanaryanan was in service till 30 November 2014.<br />
K Satish Reddy<br />
Chairman<br />
ANNEXURE - VI<br />
Information in terms of Section 197(12) of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Rule 5(1) of the Companies (Appointment<br />
and Remuneration of Managerial Personnel) Rules, 2014<br />
(i) The ratio of remuneration of each director to the median remuneration of the employees of the Company, the percentage<br />
increase in remuneration of each director, CEO, CFO and CS, for FY2015 and comparison of the remuneration of each Key<br />
Managerial Personnel (KMP) against the performance of the Company:<br />
NAME<br />
DESIGNATION<br />
RATIO OF<br />
REMUNERATION OF<br />
EACH DIRECTOR<br />
TO THE MEDIAN<br />
REMUNERATION OF<br />
EMPLOYEES<br />
% INCREASE IN<br />
REMUNERATION<br />
DURING FY2015<br />
COMPARISON OF THE REMUNERATION OF<br />
EACH KMPs (1) AGAINST THE PERFORMANCE<br />
OF THE COMPANY<br />
Mr. Satish Reddy (2) Chairman 271 -16% Compared to FY2014, the revenue in FY2015<br />
Mr. G V Prasad (2) Co-Chairman and CEO 363 18% grew by 4% and EBITDA decreased by 10%<br />
Dr. Omkar Goswami Independent Director 26 2%<br />
Mr. Ravi Bhoothalingam Independent Director 28 6%<br />
Mr. Anupam Puri Independent Director 31 -5%<br />
Dr. J P Moreau Independent Director 27 -2%<br />
Ms. Kalpana Morparia Independent Director 29 13%<br />
97