15.08.2015 Views

Introduction to the Modeling and Analysis of Complex Systems

introduction-to-the-modeling-and-analysis-of-complex-systems-sayama-pdf

introduction-to-the-modeling-and-analysis-of-complex-systems-sayama-pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

222 CHAPTER 12. CELLULAR AUTOMATA II: ANALYSISSingle cell level:p 1 = q2x2 block level:p 2 = F(p 1 )= p 14+ 4p 13 (1 – p 1 )+ 4p 12 (1 – p 1 ) 2Figure 12.5: How <strong>to</strong> estimate <strong>the</strong> conductance probability p 2 at scale s = 2 using p 1 .four different ways <strong>to</strong> transmit <strong>the</strong> fire through <strong>the</strong> area. But if <strong>the</strong>re is only one tree, <strong>the</strong>reis no way <strong>to</strong> transmit <strong>the</strong> fire, so <strong>the</strong>re is no need <strong>to</strong> consider such cases. This is <strong>the</strong>exhaustive list <strong>of</strong> possible situations where <strong>the</strong> fire will be conducted through a scale-2block. We can calculate <strong>the</strong> probability for each situation <strong>and</strong> add <strong>the</strong>m up, <strong>to</strong> obtain <strong>the</strong>following relationship between p 1 <strong>and</strong> p 2 :p 2 = Φ(p 1 ) = p 4 1 + 4p 3 1(1 − p 1 ) + 4p 2 1(1 − p 1 ) 2 (12.12)And this is <strong>the</strong> place where a very strong assumption/approximation comes in. Let’sassume that <strong>the</strong> relationship above applies <strong>to</strong> 4 × 4 blocks (Fig. 12.6), 8 × 8 blocks, etc.,all <strong>the</strong> way up <strong>to</strong> infinitely large portions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> forest, so thatp s+1 = Φ(p s ) = p 4 s + 4p 3 s(1 − p s ) + 4p 2 s(1 − p s ) 2 for all s. (12.13)Of course this is not correct, but some kind <strong>of</strong> approximation needs <strong>to</strong> be made inorder <strong>to</strong> study complex systems analytically.Exercise 12.8 Why is it not correct <strong>to</strong> assume that <strong>the</strong> relationship between <strong>the</strong>1×1 blocks <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> 2×2 blocks can be applied <strong>to</strong> 2×2 <strong>and</strong> 4×4 (<strong>and</strong> larger)? Look atFig. 12.6 carefully <strong>and</strong> figure out some configurations that violate this assumption.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!