15.08.2015 Views

Introduction to the Modeling and Analysis of Complex Systems

introduction-to-the-modeling-and-analysis-of-complex-systems-sayama-pdf

introduction-to-the-modeling-and-analysis-of-complex-systems-sayama-pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

280 CHAPTER 14. CONTINUOUS FIELD MODELS II: ANALYSIS<strong>the</strong>re are per unit <strong>of</strong> length), which is called a wave number in physics. The phase <strong>of</strong>fsetφ doesn’t really make any difference in this analysis, but we include it anyway for <strong>the</strong>sake <strong>of</strong> generality. Note that, by adopting a particular shape <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> perturbation above,we have decoupled spatial structure <strong>and</strong> temporal dynamics in Eq. (14.60) 1 . Now <strong>the</strong>only dynamical variables are ∆a(t) <strong>and</strong> ∆c(t), which are <strong>the</strong> amplitudes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sine waveshapedperturbation added <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> homogeneous equilibrium state.By plugging Eq. (14.60) in<strong>to</strong> Eqs. (14.57) <strong>and</strong> (14.59), we obtain <strong>the</strong> following:sin(ωx + φ) ∂∆a∂tsin(ωx + φ) ∂∆c∂t= −µω 2 sin(ωx + φ)∆a + χa eq ω 2 sin(ωx + φ)∆c− χω 2 cos 2 (ωx + φ)∆a∆c + χω 2 sin(ωx + φ)∆a∆c (14.61)= −Dω 2 sin(ωx + φ)∆c + f sin(ωx + φ)∆a − k sin(ωx + φ)∆c(14.62)Here, we see <strong>the</strong> product <strong>of</strong> two amplitudes (∆a∆c) in <strong>the</strong> last two terms <strong>of</strong> Eq. (14.61),which is “infinitely smaller than infinitely small,” so we can safely ignore <strong>the</strong>m <strong>to</strong> linearize<strong>the</strong> equations. Note that one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m is actually <strong>the</strong> remnant <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> product <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tw<strong>of</strong>irst-order spatial derivatives which we had no clue as <strong>to</strong> how <strong>to</strong> deal with. We should beglad <strong>to</strong> see it exiting from <strong>the</strong> stage!After ignoring those terms, every single term in <strong>the</strong> equations equally contains sin(ωx+φ), so we can divide <strong>the</strong> entire equations by sin(ωx + φ) <strong>to</strong> obtain <strong>the</strong> following linearordinary differential equations:d∆a= −µω 2 ∆a + χa eq ω 2 ∆cdt(14.63)d∆c= −Dω 2 ∆c + f∆a − k∆cdt(14.64)Or, using a linear algebra notation:( ) (d ∆a −µω2χa=eq ω 2dt ∆c f −Dω 2 − k) ( ∆a∆c)(14.65)We are finally able <strong>to</strong> convert <strong>the</strong> spatial dynamics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> original Keller-Segel model(only around its homogeneous equilibrium state) in<strong>to</strong> a very simple, non-spatial linear1 In ma<strong>the</strong>matical terms, this is an example <strong>of</strong> separation <strong>of</strong> variables—breaking down <strong>the</strong> original equationsin<strong>to</strong> a set <strong>of</strong> simpler components each <strong>of</strong> which has fewer independent variables than <strong>the</strong> originalones. PDEs for which separation <strong>of</strong> variables is possible are called separable PDEs. Our original Keller-Segel model equations are not separable PDEs, but we are trying <strong>to</strong> separate variables anyway by focusingon <strong>the</strong> dynamics around <strong>the</strong> model’s homogeneous equilibrium state <strong>and</strong> using linear approximation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!