15.08.2015 Views

Introduction to the Modeling and Analysis of Complex Systems

introduction-to-the-modeling-and-analysis-of-complex-systems-sayama-pdf

introduction-to-the-modeling-and-analysis-of-complex-systems-sayama-pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

14.3. LINEAR STABILITY ANALYSIS OF CONTINUOUS FIELD MODELS 27514.3 Linear Stability <strong>Analysis</strong> <strong>of</strong> Continuous Field ModelsWe can apply <strong>the</strong> linear stability analysis <strong>to</strong> continuous field models. This allows us <strong>to</strong>analytically obtain <strong>the</strong> conditions for which a homogeneous equilibrium state <strong>of</strong> a spatialsystem loses its stability <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>reby <strong>the</strong> system spontaneously forms non-homogeneousspatial patterns. Note again that <strong>the</strong> homogeneous equilibrium state discussed here is nolonger a single point, but it is a straight line (or a flat plane) that covers <strong>the</strong> entire spatialdomain.Consider <strong>the</strong> dynamics <strong>of</strong> a nonlinear continuous field model(∂f∂t = F f, ∂f )∂x , ∂2 f∂x , . . . (14.35)2around its homogeneous equilibrium state f eq , which satisfies0 = F (f eq , 0, 0, . . .) . (14.36)The basic approach <strong>of</strong> linear stability analysis is exactly <strong>the</strong> same as before. Namely,we will represent <strong>the</strong> system’s state as a sum <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> equilibrium state <strong>and</strong> a small perturbation,<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>n we will determine whe<strong>the</strong>r this small perturbation added <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> equilibriumwill grow or shrink over time. Using ∆f <strong>to</strong> represent <strong>the</strong> small perturbation, we apply <strong>the</strong>following replacementf(x, t) ⇒ f eq + ∆f(x, t) (14.37)<strong>to</strong> Eq. (14.35), <strong>to</strong> obtain <strong>the</strong> following new continuous field model:(∂f eq + ∆f= F f eq + ∆f, ∂(f )eq + ∆f), ∂2 (f eq + ∆f), . . .∂t∂x ∂x(2∂∆f= F f eq + ∆f, ∂∆f )∂t∂x , ∂2 ∆f∂x , . . . 2(14.38)(14.39)Now, look at <strong>the</strong> equation above. The key difference between this equation <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>previous examples <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> non-spatial models (e.g., Eq. (7.67)) is that <strong>the</strong> right h<strong>and</strong> side <strong>of</strong>Eq. (14.39) contains spatial derivatives. Without <strong>the</strong>m, F would be just a nonlinear scalaror vec<strong>to</strong>r function <strong>of</strong> f, so we could use its Jacobian matrix <strong>to</strong> obtain a linear approximation<strong>of</strong> it. But we can’t do so because <strong>of</strong> those ∂’s! We need something different <strong>to</strong> eliminatethose nuisances.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!