15.08.2015 Views

Introduction to the Modeling and Analysis of Complex Systems

introduction-to-the-modeling-and-analysis-of-complex-systems-sayama-pdf

introduction-to-the-modeling-and-analysis-of-complex-systems-sayama-pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.4. WHAT ARE GOOD MODELS? 212.4 What Are Good Models?You can create various kinds <strong>of</strong> models for a system, but useful ones have several importantproperties. Here is a very brief summary <strong>of</strong> what a good model should look like:A good model is simple, valid, <strong>and</strong> robust.Simplicity <strong>of</strong> a model is really <strong>the</strong> key essence <strong>of</strong> what modeling is all about. Themain reason why we want <strong>to</strong> build a model is that we want <strong>to</strong> have a shorter, simplerdescription <strong>of</strong> reality. As <strong>the</strong> famous principle <strong>of</strong> Occam’s razor says, if you have twomodels with equal predictive power, you should choose <strong>the</strong> simpler one. This is not a<strong>the</strong>orem or any logically proven fact, but it is a commonly accepted practice in science.Parsimony is good because it is economical (e.g., we can s<strong>to</strong>re more models within <strong>the</strong>limited capacity <strong>of</strong> our brain if <strong>the</strong>y are simpler) <strong>and</strong> also insightful (e.g., we may finduseful patterns or applications in <strong>the</strong> models if <strong>the</strong>y are simple). If you can eliminate anyparameters, variables, or assumptions from your model without losing its characteristicbehavior, you should.Validity <strong>of</strong> a model is how closely <strong>the</strong> model’s prediction agrees with <strong>the</strong> observedreality. This is <strong>of</strong> utmost importance from a practical viewpoint. If your model’s predictiondoesn’t reasonably match <strong>the</strong> observation, <strong>the</strong> model is not representing reality <strong>and</strong> isprobably useless. It is also very important <strong>to</strong> check <strong>the</strong> validity <strong>of</strong> not only <strong>the</strong> predictions<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> model but also <strong>the</strong> assumptions it uses, i.e., whe<strong>the</strong>r each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> assumptionsused in your model makes sense at its face value, in view <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> existing knowledge aswell as our common sense. Sometimes this “face validity” is more important in complexsystems modeling, because <strong>the</strong>re are many situations where we simply can’t conduct aquantitative comparison between <strong>the</strong> model prediction <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> observational data. Evenif this is <strong>the</strong> case, you should at least check <strong>the</strong> face validity <strong>of</strong> your model assumptionsbased on your underst<strong>and</strong>ing about <strong>the</strong> system <strong>and</strong>/or <strong>the</strong> phenomena.Note that <strong>the</strong>re is <strong>of</strong>ten a trade-<strong>of</strong>f between trying <strong>to</strong> achieve simplicity <strong>and</strong> validity <strong>of</strong> amodel. If you increase <strong>the</strong> model complexity, you may be able <strong>to</strong> achieve a better fit <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>observed data, but <strong>the</strong> model’s simplicity is lost <strong>and</strong> you also have <strong>the</strong> risk <strong>of</strong> overfitting—that is, <strong>the</strong> model prediction may become adjusted <strong>to</strong>o closely <strong>to</strong> a specific observation at<strong>the</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> generalizability <strong>to</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r cases. You need <strong>to</strong> strike <strong>the</strong> right balance betweenthose two criteria.Finally, robustness <strong>of</strong> a model is how insensitive <strong>the</strong> model’s prediction is <strong>to</strong> minor variations<strong>of</strong> model assumptions <strong>and</strong>/or parameter settings. This is important because <strong>the</strong>reare always errors when we create assumptions about, or measure parameter values from,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!