01.09.2015 Views

environment

environment

environment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Ingeokring Newsletter<br />

are available to do so. Repairing a leak in a traditional<br />

way however is expensive and sometimes even<br />

impossible because the locations of leaks are hardly<br />

accessible for big and heavy equipment. The available<br />

methods to repair the leak in situ so far (for example<br />

injection of grouts and gels) have numerous<br />

disadvantages. They are often expensive and<br />

<strong>environment</strong>ally unfriendly. Another disadvantage is<br />

that an excessive amount of injection fluids is required<br />

because the location of the leak is not exactly known.<br />

Therefore, a need exists for easier, more effective and<br />

less expensive methods.<br />

2. BioSealing: a new promising solution<br />

The method of BioSealing utilises the natural chemical,<br />

physical and biological properties of the soil, the<br />

groundwater and the leak itself. The idea of BioSealing<br />

evolved from problems occurring in the field of drinking<br />

water supply, namely clogging in groundwater extraction<br />

wells. In groundwater extraction more or less the<br />

opposite of the problem of leak occurs: near<br />

groundwater extraction wells clogging takes place which<br />

puts limits on the possible amounts of extraction and<br />

causes many problems. These clogging processes are<br />

caused by natural processes in the underground. The<br />

idea of BioSealing was to use and stimulate these natural<br />

clogging processes to repair leaks in water barriers by<br />

adding nutrition. In the case of BioSealing repair of leaks<br />

is interpreted as “to reduce the permeability at the<br />

location of the leak”. One of the goals set when this<br />

method was designed was to reduce the permeability<br />

with at least a factor 5.<br />

Due to a difference in hydraulic heads inside and outside<br />

the water retaining barrier a groundwater flow is induced<br />

towards and through the leak. Addition of nutrition for<br />

micro-organisms near the leak creates a favourable<br />

<strong>environment</strong> which leads to a multiplication of microorganisms<br />

in the vicinity of the leak. The microorganisms<br />

will cause a biological clogging of biomass<br />

in the leak. Later this clogging can be reinforced by a<br />

(biologically induced) chemical precipitation of iron sulphide.<br />

The method of Bio Sealing has been patented by<br />

GeoDelft.<br />

3. Laboratory testing<br />

Set up<br />

In a first stage the BioSealing process was tested in a<br />

laboratory setting. The objective of the laboratory test<br />

was to discover if it was possible to control the clogging<br />

process in a defined <strong>environment</strong> In large PVC columns<br />

filled with natural Dutch Pleistocene sand a separation<br />

plate with small hole was placed, representing a leak,<br />

while water was squeezed through the columns under<br />

constant pressure. The nutrition (Nutrolase provided<br />

by AVEBE) was added to the water to stimulate bacterial<br />

growth and thereby close the leak. The location of the<br />

clogging process and the durability of the clog were<br />

studied.<br />

The experiments were performed under anaerobic<br />

conditions using the water as transport medium for<br />

nutrition. The water flow was directed towards and<br />

through the leak. The water flow was driven by natural<br />

decline in the column (using a storage tank) and the<br />

flow was upwards to prevent specific flow channels to<br />

occur. Two inlets were created, one for water and one<br />

for the nutrition (Nutrolase) was created. Groundwater<br />

velocities used were based on travel time between<br />

injection and hole in real conditions. This time was<br />

estimated for building pits using customary<br />

groundwater conditions, knowledge of leaking<br />

conditions and the knowledge that new leak detection<br />

techniques can find the leak within 5 meters accuracy.<br />

This accuracy is realistic with electrical leak detection<br />

techniques such as ECR and EFT, recently tested on<br />

several sites in the Netherlands and Germany.<br />

Results<br />

From these experiments it was concluded that it is<br />

possible to repair a leak with natural clogging processes.<br />

In the laboratory experiments the clogging always<br />

appeared around the leak, independently of the flow<br />

speed, the size of the leak and the kind of nutrition. The<br />

experiments showed some difficulties. An example of a<br />

difficulty encountered was the formation of gas that<br />

causes temporary clogging. After the gas has<br />

disappeared the leak flow is reinstalled. The gas<br />

formation may be caused by high temperature in<br />

laboratory circumstances. The durability tests showed<br />

that after stopping the nutrition supply the microorganisms<br />

stayed at the hole for the duration of the<br />

test, which was in this case 4 months. This leads to the<br />

conclusion that Bio Sealing is a durable solution. A<br />

boundary condition is that the clogging process takes<br />

place in an anaerobic <strong>environment</strong>, because otherwise<br />

the iron sulphide will oxidate and dissolve.<br />

Figure 2: Set up of the field experiment<br />

10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!