01.09.2015 Views

environment

environment

environment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Vol. 11 No. 1 2004<br />

PROFESSOR’S COLUMN<br />

"Geological Engineering" or "Engineering Geology"<br />

- What is in a Name?<br />

Professor A. Keith Turner<br />

Department of Geology and Geological Engineering<br />

Colorado School of Mines<br />

Golden, Colorado 80401 USA<br />

At first glance the terms “geological engineer” and<br />

“engineering geologist” appear synonymous. Because<br />

the two terms employ essentially the same two words –<br />

“geology” and “engineering” – although in reverse<br />

order, the opportunity for confusion is great. The word<br />

choices may be unfortunate, but the two terms represent<br />

distinct, although related, concepts concerning<br />

educational and professional endeavors. Both have<br />

developed in response to the complexity of modern<br />

engineering design, especially those designs involving<br />

the interface between naturally occurring earth materials<br />

and the engineered structure, or the use of naturally<br />

occurring materials within the constructed facility.<br />

Geological Engineering<br />

In the early 20 th Century, advances in both technology<br />

and engineering made larger and more complex<br />

engineering works feasible. New branches of<br />

engineering – such as petroleum engineering –<br />

developed in response to technological advances.<br />

Existing engineering disciplines – such as civil<br />

engineering – increased demands for new specialties to<br />

design ever larger and more complex bridges, dams,<br />

tunnels, for water-supply and transportation systems.<br />

The minerals and petroleum industries also required<br />

increasing numbers of exploration and production<br />

specialists and administrators – roles for which<br />

engineering training combined with geological<br />

knowledge was the basic requirement.<br />

Consequently, a number of universities and mining<br />

schools in the western United States began to offer<br />

engineering programs leading to a degree in “Geological<br />

Engineering.” Graduates from these programs were<br />

hired by petroleum and minerals exploration and<br />

production companies, and placed in positions where<br />

their combined geological and engineering training made<br />

them uniquely qualified. Subsequently, as professional<br />

engineering registration procedures became codified,<br />

these geological engineering programs became<br />

accredited – allowing their graduates to later achieve<br />

the status of Professional Engineer (PE). Geological<br />

engineers that obtained PE status could legally approve<br />

designs for engineering works, an important<br />

consideration in some situations. The term “Geological<br />

Engineer” thus developed in the United States in<br />

response to both technological demands and to legal<br />

professional engineering registration procedures. A<br />

geological engineer is trained as an engineer – but an<br />

engineer with a broad understanding of applied<br />

geological science.<br />

Most of the early geological engineers did not work on<br />

civil engineering projects. They were more likely to<br />

work on minerals exploration and exploitation projects<br />

with mining engineers, or on petroleum exploration and<br />

production projects with petroleum engineers. Only in<br />

the latter half of the 20 th Century, when major civil<br />

engineering projects following World War II placed new<br />

demands for specialists to work with civil engineers,<br />

did many North American universities begin to provide<br />

“options” within their academic programs – usually<br />

three, with titles such as “Petroleum Exploration”,<br />

“Minerals Exploration” and “Engineering Geology.”<br />

Thus developed the confusing situation of some<br />

“Geological Engineers” undertaking programs of study<br />

in “Engineering Geology.”<br />

Engineering Geology<br />

In contrast to the geological engineer, the engineering<br />

geologist remains first of all a geoscientist – albeit a<br />

rather applied geologist. Engineering geology uses<br />

geology to create more efficient and effective<br />

engineering works, to assess and allay <strong>environment</strong>al<br />

concerns, and to promote the public health, safety, and<br />

welfare. Geologists have advised on engineering works<br />

from the earliest days of geology investigations; the<br />

evolution of relationships between civil engineering and<br />

geology forms an interesting historical study.<br />

The term “engineering geology” became widely<br />

accepted only as the demand for geological specialists<br />

to advise civil engineers developed in the last half of<br />

the 20 th Century. Several universities in both the USA<br />

and Canada established “Engineering Geology” options<br />

within science-oriented geological programs. Graduates<br />

who chose to work with civil engineers adopted the<br />

title “Engineering Geologist.” Many Canadian<br />

university geology departments either partially or entirely<br />

joined the faculties of applied science (in other words –<br />

engineering). This allowed many, if not all, of their<br />

graduates to achieve registration as professional<br />

engineers, and many individuals did so. In contrast,<br />

within the USA, graduates from these science-oriented<br />

49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!