01.09.2015 Views

environment

environment

environment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Vol. 11 No. 1 2004<br />

unattractive public housing estate situated on a ridge<br />

exposed to the cold winds of the winter of 73/74). Their<br />

main industry was ‘Stoneware Ltd.’ a clay-ceramic works<br />

nearby and where my site office was located. (A sparse<br />

cabin with a paraffin heater not exactly ideal when fuel<br />

of the fluid type is hard to come by). It was situated next<br />

to old disused brickworks. The clay pipes being<br />

produced nearby looked like an industry that should<br />

have imploded on itself half a century earlier. Much of it<br />

looked Victorian and even the their offices, an apology<br />

of some unattractive small brick utility buildings had<br />

antique filing cabinets made out of oak wood!<br />

The pipeline would terminate there to supply a proposed<br />

sludge treatment works. The solidified sludge would be<br />

disposed of in what looked probably the not to distant<br />

future, a disused clay pit. The question arose: would<br />

the clay pit be suitable to contain the heavy metal<br />

solidified sludge cake without contaminating the ground<br />

water (assuming the groundwater was not<br />

contaminated!). To make matters worse, Stoneware had<br />

landscaped the spoil heap and part, despite levelling,<br />

was slip failing Figure 1 showing the geology interpreted<br />

at the time from the borehole logs and published<br />

geological reports and a photo of the failure.<br />

In the end the old clay quarry pit was not chosen and<br />

the treatment works located elsewhere upstream of Lea<br />

Marsten. I saw from a website the pit still exists and is<br />

filled with water. It is used for diving. The website<br />

described the visibility as very poor.<br />

. I sent home a tongue in cheek letter at the time:<br />

“You realize I keep a site diary, it goes something like<br />

this:<br />

WEATHER: Rain, windy, cool<br />

ACTIVITY:<br />

Rig one: on H12 about 3m<br />

Rig two finish H24 moving to H26<br />

Rig three on H25 down 20m<br />

WATER LEVELS H9 32cm H2 31 cm H3.1 5cm, H3.2<br />

6cm<br />

PHONE CALLS: Steve Colback: he would like another<br />

hole in old quarry workings. I said it would not be<br />

possible since the rig has just moved out and the the<br />

driller would not be pleased going back in. Lorry<br />

Thompson (design/project engineer) told him (Steve<br />

Colback) to address my mail to Swan Hotel and not site<br />

office.<br />

VISITORS: Mr. Jennings, Chief Geologist FE<br />

(Foundation Engineering)<br />

STONEWARE Ltd., Saw Mr. Faulkner, director.<br />

1. He maintained he had the final option as to where<br />

the pipeline should go.<br />

Figure 3 Tourist brochure map of Kingsbury River Park. Note North is from lower right to upper left.<br />

45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!