06.03.2016 Views

France

France-HiT

France-HiT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

158<br />

Health systems in transition <br />

<strong>France</strong><br />

2013<br />

• Under a provision of the National Interprofessional Agreement enacted as part of the<br />

Employment Protection Law (loi sur la sécurisation de l’emploi), all employers must<br />

provide group VHI coverage for their employees (effective 1 January 2016).<br />

• The 2013 Social Security Finance Act created the CASA, a 0.3% tax on retirement and<br />

disability pensions, for the purpose of financing a planned Aging and Dependency Law<br />

(see section 6.2). Consideration of the proposed law was postponed until late 2015 and<br />

will not be implemented until 2016.<br />

• The revenue ceilings for access to CMU-C and financial assistance to purchase a private<br />

VHI contract (ACS) (section 3.5.1) were exceptionally increased by 7%, pursuant to the<br />

recommendation of an interministerial committee to combat exclusion. While the ceilings<br />

are adjusted annually for inflation, this additional increase was undertaken to improve<br />

financial access to care by expanding VHI coverage for the less well-off population.<br />

2014<br />

• The 2014 Social Security Finance Act included a programme of regional pilot projects<br />

aimed at improving care coordination for frail elderly people and finding alternatives to<br />

the existing fragmented care organization.<br />

6.1.1 Improving health system governance and transparency<br />

The institutional complexity of the French health care system and the conflicts<br />

of power and legitimacy associated with it are major issues, particularly with<br />

respect to the relationship between the state and SHI. Reforms, therefore, tend to<br />

search for institutional equilibrium. Since the late 1980s, health care governance<br />

has been substantially reorganized, with a process of decentralization at the<br />

regional level, an increase in the role of parliament and an attempt to clarify<br />

the respective roles of the state and SHI.<br />

In the French context, decentralization was mainly a form of deconcentration,<br />

where policies and frameworks are defined at the central level and implemented<br />

at the local level, adapted to local situations. The Ministry in charge of Health<br />

and the government remain the main decision-makers in health care in <strong>France</strong>.<br />

The last major step forward in decentralization was made through the 2009<br />

HPST Act, which created the ARSs (see section 2.4). However, while creation<br />

of the ARSs, which are autonomous bodies, can be seen as a step towards<br />

devolution, the Ministry in charge of Health retains the power to nominate each<br />

ARS director. Moreover, the planned 2015 health reform will likely increase<br />

state control of ARS governance (see section 6.2). Indeed, power at the national<br />

level remains significant even when compared with other countries such as<br />

England, which is considered to be highly centralized (Ettelt et al., 2010) (for<br />

more details, see section 7.1.2 in Chevreul et al., 2010).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!