France
France-HiT
France-HiT
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
158<br />
Health systems in transition <br />
<strong>France</strong><br />
2013<br />
• Under a provision of the National Interprofessional Agreement enacted as part of the<br />
Employment Protection Law (loi sur la sécurisation de l’emploi), all employers must<br />
provide group VHI coverage for their employees (effective 1 January 2016).<br />
• The 2013 Social Security Finance Act created the CASA, a 0.3% tax on retirement and<br />
disability pensions, for the purpose of financing a planned Aging and Dependency Law<br />
(see section 6.2). Consideration of the proposed law was postponed until late 2015 and<br />
will not be implemented until 2016.<br />
• The revenue ceilings for access to CMU-C and financial assistance to purchase a private<br />
VHI contract (ACS) (section 3.5.1) were exceptionally increased by 7%, pursuant to the<br />
recommendation of an interministerial committee to combat exclusion. While the ceilings<br />
are adjusted annually for inflation, this additional increase was undertaken to improve<br />
financial access to care by expanding VHI coverage for the less well-off population.<br />
2014<br />
• The 2014 Social Security Finance Act included a programme of regional pilot projects<br />
aimed at improving care coordination for frail elderly people and finding alternatives to<br />
the existing fragmented care organization.<br />
6.1.1 Improving health system governance and transparency<br />
The institutional complexity of the French health care system and the conflicts<br />
of power and legitimacy associated with it are major issues, particularly with<br />
respect to the relationship between the state and SHI. Reforms, therefore, tend to<br />
search for institutional equilibrium. Since the late 1980s, health care governance<br />
has been substantially reorganized, with a process of decentralization at the<br />
regional level, an increase in the role of parliament and an attempt to clarify<br />
the respective roles of the state and SHI.<br />
In the French context, decentralization was mainly a form of deconcentration,<br />
where policies and frameworks are defined at the central level and implemented<br />
at the local level, adapted to local situations. The Ministry in charge of Health<br />
and the government remain the main decision-makers in health care in <strong>France</strong>.<br />
The last major step forward in decentralization was made through the 2009<br />
HPST Act, which created the ARSs (see section 2.4). However, while creation<br />
of the ARSs, which are autonomous bodies, can be seen as a step towards<br />
devolution, the Ministry in charge of Health retains the power to nominate each<br />
ARS director. Moreover, the planned 2015 health reform will likely increase<br />
state control of ARS governance (see section 6.2). Indeed, power at the national<br />
level remains significant even when compared with other countries such as<br />
England, which is considered to be highly centralized (Ettelt et al., 2010) (for<br />
more details, see section 7.1.2 in Chevreul et al., 2010).