06.03.2016 Views

France

France-HiT

France-HiT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Health systems in transition <strong>France</strong> 179<br />

7.2.2 Equity in financing<br />

Overall, the financing of the health system results in a redistribution of<br />

resources both horizontally from the well to the sick and vertically from<br />

people with higher incomes to those with lower incomes, through taxes on<br />

revenues (HCAAM, 2013b). SHI has facilitated a 19% reduction of inequalities<br />

in standards of living (four-fifths from the method of financing and one-fifth<br />

from services) (Duval & Lardellier, 2012).<br />

The financing of SHI is considered progressive because of the tax relief<br />

provided to individuals with low salaries as well as the different CSG<br />

contribution rates depending on the type of revenue (HCAAM, 2013). However,<br />

private expenditure through VHI and OOP is regressive, and the transfer of<br />

expenditure not covered by SHI towards VHI, for which the functioning and<br />

financing principles are not solidarity based as they are for SHI, has exacerbated<br />

inequalities in the financial access to care (HCAAM, 2013b). Moreover, people<br />

with lower incomes spend a greater share of their disposable income on private<br />

health care expenditure than the wealthier (Duval & Lardellier, 2012). Under<br />

the Kakwani index, which measures vertical equity, OOP financing would be<br />

considered progressive if the annual share borne by the lowest revenue deciles is<br />

lower than their share of total revenues. In <strong>France</strong>, the poorest 20% account for<br />

7.1% of total revenues but for 14.7% of OOP spending, resulting in a Kakwani<br />

index of 0.25, demonstrating that OOP expenditure is vertically inequitable and<br />

regressive (Geoffard & de Lagasnerie, 2012).<br />

Patients with the highest levels of OOP spending are on average older<br />

(60 years or more), with one or more chronic diseases covered by the ALD<br />

programme (see section 3.3.1) and are three times more likely to have been<br />

hospitalized than the general population (HCAAM, 2013c). While patients who<br />

benefit from the ALD programme are covered 100% for care related to their<br />

chronic condition, they still may face high OOP expenditure for other health<br />

care, as well as for hospitalization (the daily hospital catering fee is not covered<br />

by ALD, even for hospitalization related to the covered disease) and extrabilling<br />

in excess of official tariffs that is not covered by SHI.<br />

Individuals do not pay for private VHI contracts according to their incomes<br />

but rather based on an estimate of their needs determined by age in the case<br />

of mutual firms or often by health questionnaires for commercial insurers<br />

or potentially in optional group contracts offered by provident institutions<br />

(see section 3.5.2). Moreover, group VHI contracts generally provide better<br />

coverage than individual contracts. Indeed, employees covered by group<br />

VHI contracts have a double financial advantage over those with individual

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!