France
France-HiT
France-HiT
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Health systems in transition <strong>France</strong> 189<br />
than those in the highest income quintile (Célant, Guillaume & Rochereau,<br />
2014). In terms of mortality, regional (see Fig. 1.3) and gender (see Table 1.3)<br />
differences are apparent. Indeed, adult male mortality is more than double adult<br />
female mortality.<br />
An integrated and comprehensive policy has been argued to be the<br />
appropriate response for addressing interdependent health determinants.<br />
However, previous attempts to establish a broad intersectoral approach to health<br />
policy have faltered (see section 2.6). The Ministry in charge of Health’s 2012<br />
National Strategy for Health emphasized the need to prioritize addressing the<br />
determinants of poor health (Ministry in charge of Health, 2013) and established<br />
a new interministerial health committee for addressing health inequalities.<br />
7.5 Health system efficiency<br />
If the French population is willing to keep the SHI system public, the share of the<br />
population that is ready to spend more of their income on health has decreased,<br />
falling from 70% in 2010 to 55% in 2013. Indeed, improving the efficiency<br />
of the health care system to ensure the financial viability of the system is<br />
important in order to avoid the growth of the deficit and its related burden on<br />
future generations, or alternatives such increasing statutory contributions or<br />
reducing the services provided, which would adversely affect both the economy<br />
and access to care (HCAAM, 2013c).<br />
7.5.1 Allocative efficiency<br />
In <strong>France</strong>, there is no formal mechanism of resource allocation for the overall<br />
health care system and across sectors of care as there is in the United Kingdom.<br />
The main resource allocation mechanism in place is the ONDAM, which sets<br />
the overall level of SHI expenditure and its distribution across six subsectors<br />
of care (ambulatory care, health care in hospitals paid on DRG basis, health<br />
care in other hospitals, health and social care for the elderly, health and social<br />
care for disabled people, and other types of care; see section 3.3.3). However,<br />
the ONDAM subsector targets are not necessarily based solely on population.<br />
Fig. 7.2 shows the ONDAM annual growth rate approved by the parliament<br />
and the size of the overrun or underspending for the period 1997–2012. The<br />
establishment of an Alert Committee in 2004 (see section 3.3.3) has insured<br />
greater credibility of this system and, since 2010, the overall ONDAM targets<br />
have been underspent, suggesting that the implemented SHI cost-containment<br />
measures have been successful.