06.03.2016 Views

France

France-HiT

France-HiT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Health systems in transition <strong>France</strong> 189<br />

than those in the highest income quintile (Célant, Guillaume & Rochereau,<br />

2014). In terms of mortality, regional (see Fig. 1.3) and gender (see Table 1.3)<br />

differences are apparent. Indeed, adult male mortality is more than double adult<br />

female mortality.<br />

An integrated and comprehensive policy has been argued to be the<br />

appropriate response for addressing interdependent health determinants.<br />

However, previous attempts to establish a broad intersectoral approach to health<br />

policy have faltered (see section 2.6). The Ministry in charge of Health’s 2012<br />

National Strategy for Health emphasized the need to prioritize addressing the<br />

determinants of poor health (Ministry in charge of Health, 2013) and established<br />

a new interministerial health committee for addressing health inequalities.<br />

7.5 Health system efficiency<br />

If the French population is willing to keep the SHI system public, the share of the<br />

population that is ready to spend more of their income on health has decreased,<br />

falling from 70% in 2010 to 55% in 2013. Indeed, improving the efficiency<br />

of the health care system to ensure the financial viability of the system is<br />

important in order to avoid the growth of the deficit and its related burden on<br />

future generations, or alternatives such increasing statutory contributions or<br />

reducing the services provided, which would adversely affect both the economy<br />

and access to care (HCAAM, 2013c).<br />

7.5.1 Allocative efficiency<br />

In <strong>France</strong>, there is no formal mechanism of resource allocation for the overall<br />

health care system and across sectors of care as there is in the United Kingdom.<br />

The main resource allocation mechanism in place is the ONDAM, which sets<br />

the overall level of SHI expenditure and its distribution across six subsectors<br />

of care (ambulatory care, health care in hospitals paid on DRG basis, health<br />

care in other hospitals, health and social care for the elderly, health and social<br />

care for disabled people, and other types of care; see section 3.3.3). However,<br />

the ONDAM subsector targets are not necessarily based solely on population.<br />

Fig. 7.2 shows the ONDAM annual growth rate approved by the parliament<br />

and the size of the overrun or underspending for the period 1997–2012. The<br />

establishment of an Alert Committee in 2004 (see section 3.3.3) has insured<br />

greater credibility of this system and, since 2010, the overall ONDAM targets<br />

have been underspent, suggesting that the implemented SHI cost-containment<br />

measures have been successful.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!